mrmojorisin75

so we spend ages negotiating for given to go back the day after it's finalised to give them the money back? eh? surely not...we'd have just straight swapped?

we'll be right, shola and smith partnership whooooooooooooop!!

That would constitute a major overhaul of the first team and squad. Can't see us making that many changes without a number of departures. Guess there'll be some departures then. I'm still hopeful of Alan Smith leaving. Geremi maybe. Duff hopefully. Time for positive thinking Dave don't ruin this. it'd basically be the sales of given and insomnia plus 10m from ashley to get that lot...not impossible but highly unlikely unlikely unless one is a loan with a view to buy and the possibility of smith leaving, momma!

pretty much bang on with that, he's a travesty...i said it elsewhere but 25% of the game was played in the middle 3rd of the pitch...any ideas why? answers on a postcard

should go some ways to proving his cuntdom imo...you don't go emailing skysports saying 'we'll have something for your yellow ticker' if that something is gonna be daniel fucking fox it'll be veloso or someone for a fee of that the size that's being talked about, maybe bent or he's a total cunt

they shouldn't be, not at all, because we'd still have to play nicky butt and kevin nolan in CM trying to supply one end and help stop attacks at the other end when both are slow as fuck change to fox, nolan, distin, bent & veloso then you might be talking but we all know the likelihood of that

what the fuck would we be doing going for a CB? oh yeah

aye, exactly the same those two situations, torres = xisco

our left back has his best game in ages and we're off to sign another...! (i know we need backup, but still)

one thing redknapp does very, VERY well imo is loans...gets some belters still, we've got duff eh?

Changed the first two from struggling lower division clubs to established Premier League clubs. You could argue that without Keegan's time at City they would not be in the position they are now. England wasn't the greatest success, but subsequent managers show that he certainly wasn't the worst in recent years. A lot of international football is luck and "what if's" - England were unlucky to go out of the Euros with that last minute penalty when Keegan was in charge, who knows what might have happened if we hadn't. Italia 90 is considered by many to be England's best tournament performance since 1966, however we were so close to going out in the group stages - abysmal in the first two games, until a very late goal in the last game took us through. in the interests of balance he had (relatively) heaps of cash to spend at fulham, and once he got man city up was given min 50m to spend there (macken, anelka etc...) but i'm not sure what he spent to get them up just to add some balance - he did will in both jobs but didn't exactly do it on a shoestring either

which deals?

erm, eh? what the fuck is this all about? EDIT: is it because craig is stading about outside and MA has mailed to take the piss or summat?

can't disagree with you, for once, everything else aside we'd have won more points with KK in charge simple as

Nah, the only volleys of exasperation with our own where I was were directed purely towards Shola and Butt. that's something then, time heals all wounds? might encourage ashley to make an effort next season if we stay up

god he was bad yesterday (pen aside) - how bad can xisco be?

anything directed at ashley or yesterday then? before, during or after the match?

what's the fucking point of signing him anyways? with in charge a midfield is largely irrelevant from what i can see...unless we're signing him as a CB who has an accurate hoof up the pitch, then it makes sense

Should really sign him up on a new contract for real. He's worth it. Contemplating getting his name/# on my 09-11 home kit. makes me sick when lads like him put in so much and yet he'll probably be on, what, 20-30% of duffs wages max? But that's alright mate. At least he's earning his pay, and will deserve his hike in wages and new contract. Don't worry, he's not starving true enough, although you'd think duff was from his performance

at least smith runs into people and sometimes makes them fall over, duff tried it yesterday and even failed to bring the guy down, he just slid off duff and the mackem kept on running...how bad does it have to be that you can't even make an opponent fall over when you try fouling them?

anything has to be better than that travesty of a shirt we're wearing now - sums up our club at the moment, cheap and nasty

Should really sign him up on a new contract for real. He's worth it. Contemplating getting his name/# on my 09-11 home kit. makes me sick when lads like him put in so much and yet he'll probably be on, what, 20-30% of duffs wages max?

agreed also agree that with him on the left balance is required...best type of wide man combo there is in my book, one like spidey who is dangerous with the ball & then a beckham/solano type who can consistently deliver dangerous crosses into the box obviously 2 players who can do it all would be the best but that's hard to come by...is taylor the type with a bit of quality in his delivery? not seen enough of him to say myself

there was a stat of the game yesterday and it was that 25% of the game was played in the middle 3rd of the park, now while there were obviously 2 teams on the pitch JFK's tactics and team selection had a big bearing on that stat shite midfield, 2 huge fuckers up front...we're not gonna be challenging barca or arsenal for the quality of our passing football are we? hate JFK, the cunt (a fitting expletive)