Kaizero

Isn't the Disney and Fox deal supposedly going to take up to two year? Mostly because of investigations to make sure it’s not creating a monopoly on the market, not because of talks to over the structure/price of the deal. Wrong! Not re set price, but structure.

Insanity. He needs to go. Horrible scrote.

Isn't the Disney and Fox deal supposedly going to take up to two year? It’ll take a loooong time Stifler using a horrible example there.

...prostitution!

His argument is that when he fucks up, he gets hammered much more than he would if he was 100% Swedish. He's fair game, because he's not really Swedish when he fucks up, only when he's great.

In what ways is he wrong? That there's not a latent racism against second generation immigrants? I fear you might be quite naive if you believe that. Same way as "John Carew isn't really Norwegian, you know" used to be an argument far too many idiots made when he was shit, and then the same idiots embraced him fully as the most Norwegian of Norwegians when he was not shit. Still see it today even with Josh King.

Would mean less break in play as well.

He's 100% correct, tbf.

The La Brea Tar Pits. The The Tar Tar Pits.

But VAR will be used where there is doubt with a penalty. How many people disagreed over the penalty that Chelsea got at Arsenal? Quite a few did on here. So that decision would have been reviewed by VAR and it would still be a contentious decision. The referee wont say ‘sorry lads, I cant review that one cos it looks a bit dodgy’. No it won't. Or it shouldn't anyway. Why wouldn’t it? The referee would definitely review it as the Arsenal players would claim a dive and the Chelsea players would be totally the opposite. The referee would go into it looking for issues around whether or not there was contact, when he’d then get sucked into whether or not the contact was sufficient for the player to go down - which is perception rather than clear cut. Why wouldn’t the referee review it? Who or what would stop them? For exactly the reason that I mentioned in the previous post - If there's any contentious grey area whatsoever, then VAR isn't used. It has to be absolutely clear cut that an error has been made. If the referee checks then it should be that they have serious doubts, or it should be because the VAR panel know that an obviously erroneous decision has been made. VAR isn't there for the reasons that you've mentioned, but it seems to be a misconception that everyone including pundits seems to have. KI

It’s a stupid article. As I understand it, VAR will be used for offences after the whistle is blown. It’s a human decision to blow the whistle. You don’t go further back than where the whistle was blown. You check that offence and move on.

Perfect giffage

Or just draw Spurs away.

I miss the good old days of 2007 when this board went mental at Darren Bent moving to Tottenham for "crazy money" (£16.5 million). Also, I've been looking at old threads 'cause I'm well bored right now

Poll reset. 0 5 (2%) 1 1 (0.4%) 2 9 (3.6%) 3 17 (6.9%) 4 14 (5.6%) 5 31 (12.5%) 6 29 (11.7%) 7 40 (16.1%) 8 52 (21%) 9 25 (10.1%) 10 25 (10.1%)

Difficult line to put to music! It’s why Meat Loaf is such a legend.

Deadline extended to Jan 10th. Need more nominations, get to it!

3, 2, 4, 1, 5

Lovely boys.

You know you can still watch him, right?

Will probably need to run the nominations a few days longer, beacause as usual there’s still lacking a fair few from the 40-50 nomination PMs we usually have/need. Get to it! It doesn’t take that long if you don’t overthink things

You didnt join the pantalaimon brigade then, theres still time to change your avatar? Naa? I couldn't possibly replace wor Bodie. But you could photoshop a pantalaimon in next to him and pretend they’re best friends?

LOCK LICK LICK LICK

Is that a request? Looks like they did it for you?