Kaizero

I like turtles.

Wolves.

Once again it was quite clear when he came on that Ranger > Shola. He actually did stuff off the ball for starters.

Crocked then or did he just pretend since his mistake led to a goal?

Whilst McLoven is shit, his full name is rather cool: Peter Rosenkrands Løvenkrands.

No. Why would we play two fucking defensive midfielders, not to mention Smith who is barely a footballer? We have nobody to put on for Guthrie unless we change formation to 4-3-3 or something.

Groin injury apparently.

This. We've really lacked players like that in the first half.

How is that a free kick against Routledge?

Was a lot closer than I expected, almost wasn't wasted money. It still was, though, unsurprisingly.

Went a bit crazy with nationalistic pride and backed Andreas Evenesen against Ricky Burns with £35 @ 6.50

Cardiff and Chelski.

I think Cajun was making a joke.

You mean he is pissing all over me by contradicting himself? Yeah right... more like internet mates sticking up for each other. He's pissing all over you by having a fair point. I couldn't care less who made said point. He's being reasonable, you're being silly. Listen.... it's not the first time that you've stuck-up for someone simply because you get on better with him than me. You were also the knight in shining armour for ronaldo a while back when we were arguing. I couldn't give a shit who you like more.... just fuck off with your internet mates tag thing. For fucks sake. I don't fucking give a shit who's making a point as long as their point is good. If you made an effort to not make idiotic points, I'd potentially be siding with you. But you're not, you're continually making shit points. Internet mates? Fucking hell man, have a word. So you're saying Wullie wasn't contradicting himself? You're not fooling anyone by that. He's made a sound argument that I am in agreement with. You've made a shit argument that I'm not in agreement with. Simples. It doesn't mean I like you less as a person than someone else, it just means we're just disagreeing on something. Also simples. Not an answer to my question, tbh. It is. By saying I am in agreement with him I'm saying I don't think he's contradicted himself. He's said you didn't support the English bid, which may or may not be true, I dunno. (EDIT: not true then.) But besides that he's spot on most of the time.

I ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Wullie soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much!

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/8857/article123925307a3f2350.jpg Disagrees.

You mean he is pissing all over me by contradicting himself? Yeah right... more like internet mates sticking up for each other. He's pissing all over you by having a fair point. I couldn't care less who made said point. He's being reasonable, you're being silly. Listen.... it's not the first time that you've stuck-up for someone simply because you get on better with him than me. You were also the knight in shining armour for ronaldo a while back when we were arguing. I couldn't give a shit who you like more.... just fuck off with your internet mates tag thing. For fucks sake. I don't fucking give a shit who's making a point as long as their point is good. If you made an effort to not make idiotic points, I'd potentially be siding with you. But you're not, you're continually making shit points. Internet mates? Fucking hell man, have a word. So you're saying Wullie wasn't contradicting himself? You're not fooling anyone by that. He's made a sound argument that I am in agreement with. You've made a shit argument that I'm not in agreement with. Simples. It doesn't mean I like you less as a person than someone else, it just means we're just disagreeing on something. Also simples.

But... but... we're bff's, man! Internet bros!

I'd like to know how the fuck I'm Wullie's mate first.

You mean he is pissing all over me by contradicting himself? Yeah right... more like internet mates sticking up for each other. He's pissing all over you by having a fair point. I couldn't care less who made said point. He's being reasonable, you're being silly. Listen.... it's not the first time that you've stuck-up for someone simply because you get on better with him than me. You were also the knight in shining armour for ronaldo a while back when we were arguing. I couldn't give a shit who you like more.... just fuck off with your internet mates tag thing. For fucks sake. I don't fucking give a shit who's making a point as long as their point is good. If you made an effort to not make idiotic points, I'd potentially be siding with you. But you're not, you're continually making shit points. Internet mates? Fucking hell man, have a word.

You mean he is pissing all over me by contradicting himself? Yeah right... more like internet mates sticking up for each other. He's pissing all over you by having a fair point. I couldn't care less who made said point. He's being reasonable, you're being silly.

Basically, to any sane person who'd had a look through the bids, USA, Australia, Japan and Korea's bids were lightyears ahead of Qatar. The fact Qatar got it is either down to Blatters ego and Nobel Peace Prize aspirations or the FIFA voters being bought. Simples.

Wullie is pissing all over Dinho lad, it's starting to get embarrassing for him (Dinho) now.

It was official. Here's a link from when they announced they were dropping the policy: http://www.cnn.com/2007/SPORT/football/10/29/switzerland.cup/index.html The rule is a continent can't apply to host if it has hosted one of the previous two. South America is in play for 2026, although as someone mentioned they may have their sights set on Argentina/Uruguay for 2030. That would essentially make it Africa vs. USA for 2026. USA isn't a developing country so it's certain Africa will get it if FIFA are as corrupt in eight years as they are today.

Why do you keep bring weather debates into the match threads, Decky? Why?