Jump to content

Mattoon

Member
  • Posts

    8,539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mattoon

  1. Clearly it's more than just the coaching, we look a very different side at home and you get the feeling we could give anyone a game, away from home we look like a beleaguered and discombobulated squad of misfits blindly fondling around towards relegation. Psychologically we look fucked!
  2. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    With this clown in charge we will absolutely get turned over by the fucking mackems again with FSA in charge, he'll grind an horrific result out against us and probably send us down. Something needs to be done now before its too late.
  3. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    http://news.ladbrokes.com/football/premier-league/why-newcastle-boss-will-be-gone-before-man-utd-man-gets-sacked.html So Ladbrokes are speculating he'll get the home games against AFCB and the Mackems before making a decision on his future. Lose those two and the Barcelona team won't get us out of relegation trouble, what's the fucking point in that?
  4. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    It's almost like a battered wife, having been beaten by her spouse 20 times in the last year claiming her husband has one more chance to make things right. It's not gonna happen, you know what he's like now, why put yourself through further torment, ffs.
  5. Mattoon

    Sunderland

    I very much doubt they'd use that defense like. It would be total speculation, but possibly the proof in those texts only shows that 'something' happened and he's claimed that it's a kiss. I assume the defence will be 'he didn't do, there's no evidence to prove he did'. The defence will be more manipulative towards the girl. 'You admired him, and when you met up with him you were hoping for more than a kiss and the defendant didn't go further than that did he? Because he never went further you felt hurt by him and you wanted to hurt him like he hurt you by saying these things to get him into trouble, didn't you?' Stuff like that. It's pretty hard in cases like this where there is plenty of evidence to suggest it did happen, then defense will be aiming to get a degree of doubt into the minds of the jury at the expense of the girl. She has already said that she admired him, is a big fan, and never wanted to tell anyone about it, so they will just play on that hoping she turns her back on the claims. You'd think that being a minor they won't be allowed to cross examine her directly, however they can bring her statement into question and put an element of doubt in the juries mind with those questions.
  6. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    He's blatantly not going anywhere and they'll be relying on the 18 day break for any ire to subside rather than use the time effectively in developing a plan to avoid relegation, typical Ashley. We're dicing with the drop and it's nothing less than he deserves.
  7. Mattoon

    Sunderland

    I very much doubt they'd use that defense like. It would be total speculation, but possibly the proof in those texts only shows that 'something' happened and he's claimed that it's a kiss. I assume the defence will be 'he didn't do, there's no evidence to prove he did'. Exactly, he's only admitted to meeting her and kissing her because there's solid proof in the text messages, anything else is pure conjecture you'd think?
  8. Mattoon

    Sunderland

    Maybe we should change the thread title to "Adam Johnson - fucked lol"
  9. Mattoon

    Sunderland

    I'd imagine that the defence would be she went there with full knowledge of his intentions, however she's a young, impressionable, starstruck fan and what he's done is tantamount to force.
  10. Mattoon

    Sunderland

    Yeah I read it as he's done what he's accused of, they just didn't go into detail with the young girl, she's intimated at what happened though. Sounds more one sided than I originally thought too, more than it being mutual, more like him being extremely pushy to the point it was "awkward". Sickening.
  11. ....so now someone sees the pattern other than "deluded Geordies".
  12. Nah, wait. Aye this is just starting, nowhere near vinegar strokes yet, wait for maximum impact.
  13. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    But with the huge sums of money available next season the fee for sacking McClaren is small change in comparison, there's got to be a point even a penny pinching fat miser like Ashley sees this.
  14. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    Trouble is Keegan is one of a kind where Newcastle United are concerned, he was literally the perfect fitting glove, it'll always feel like he has unfinished business here and that's what's frustrating.
  15. Fatty has been dealing with things a little differently this season and after spending circa £80m on players this season and if rumours are to be believed, without relegation clauses included, you'd have to imagine that fat arse will be twitching right now. We all know FMA's propensity to royally fuck things up though and back his subservient employees to the hilt, but how far does that loyalty stretch when there's so much money at stake this season? It could go either way, I'm hoping he does the right thing when this is clearly not getting any better and time is quickly running out but I'm not convinced he's got it in him to make a sensible decision. I think if we lose the next game he might sack him, no real idea why, just a random feeling/hope. The worst decision he could make, other than keeping him! Do it now and we've got 18 days to sort something out, don't do it after the next game when it's one game less with less time to sort the fucking team out. We're run by a bunch of clowns man! Bang on, do it now and give the new utter idiot whos completely unsuited to it a chance to look at the team Honestly why is it so hard for them to just appoint a decent manager. Only NUFC can hire a manager that's so shit he doesn't even give you a bounce. But yeah, we totally need to give the next unsuitable manager time to find new ways of making us lose.
  16. Fatty has been dealing with things a little differently this season and after spending circa £80m on players this season and if rumours are to be believed, without relegation clauses included, you'd have to imagine that fat arse will be twitching right now. We all know FMA's propensity to royally fuck things up though and back his subservient employees to the hilt, but how far does that loyalty stretch when there's so much money at stake this season? It could go either way, I'm hoping he does the right thing when this is clearly not getting any better and time is quickly running out but I'm not convinced he's got it in him to make a sensible decision. I think if we lose the next game he might sack him, no real idea why, just a random feeling/hope. The worst decision he could make, other than keeping him! Do it now and we've got 18 days to sort something out, don't do it after the next game when it's one game less with less time to sort the fucking team out. We're run by a bunch of clowns man!
  17. Fatty has been dealing with things a little differently this season and after spending circa £80m on players this season and if rumours are to be believed, without relegation clauses included, you'd have to imagine that fat arse will be twitching right now. We all know FMA's propensity to royally fuck things up though and back his subservient employees to the hilt, but how far does that loyalty stretch when there's so much money at stake this season? It could go either way, I'm hoping he does the right thing when this is clearly not getting any better and time is quickly running out but I'm not convinced he's got it in him to make a sensible decision.
  18. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    All equally shit, but don't kid yourself that Pardew's sides didn't take multiple arse poundings like this with equally inept "footballing" displays or that Carver didn't think that tactics were a little mint you get in a plastic box. Out of the three I'd take McClaren every time, but that's not saying much other than I'd rather smear shit in my eyes than eat it while I was doing it.
  19. For me the problem lies with how McClaren sets us up to play away from home rather than directly with Wij, ofc he's not blameless but if McClaren is insistent on playing a certain way away from home then it's obvious Wij doesn't fit into that style. Given the fact I don't think McClaren will change his tactics then maybe he should rest Wij, I don't think it's the right answer but I'm not the manager.
  20. Mattoon

    Sunderland

    It hurts my brain the fact they have a new thread topic for every flea brained idea that enters one of their heads, OCD nightmare that forum.
  21. It won't be too long, they're still in the denial phase.
  22. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    That's what I find worrying, either he's talking out his arse or he's deluded if he genuinely thinks he plays attacking football away from home. Tomorrow will be tell all on whether he's learnt anything from our recent home and away performances.
  23. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    If I ever here "front foot" again I'll kick that person in the cunt!
  24. Mattoon

    Steve McClaren

    I found this more worrying: "Maybe that's to our detriment that we have gone for the win. We can't sit back, we can't soak up pressure and hit teams on the break, we have to be quite front foot. "That's how we play. It's not got us results and we are hoping to turn that around, starting tomorrow."
×
×
  • Create New...