Jump to content

timeEd32

Member
  • Posts

    9,891
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by timeEd32

  1. It's petty, but I will never forgive Miggy for not using his right foot when Tomori made the goal line clearance. That was the moment I was done with him.
  2. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    The PSR / financial discussions get all the flak, but the real stain on any transfer thread is the constant smokescreen comments.
  3. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    To be fair more than half of the content on this forum is people worrying about things which are completely out of our hands. Part of the ride, unfortunately, is figuring out how to compete within the financial regulations when others have had a huge headstart. I'm enjoying it more than if we were able to just buy the league to be honest, but it's going to have its frustrating moments.
  4. According to reports it’s 20-25% of the next fee.
  5. I keep forgetting that Atlanta has a sell-on clause with Miggy. I'd really love some rumblings on outgoings -- Dubravka, Fraser, Lewis, Miggy, Targett (in a dream). Anything please.
  6. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    I have no ill will towards Sean. I just don't think he's good enough, though he's honestly fine as a 5th/6th choice CM. The only thing I can't stand about him are his attempts at diving.
  7. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    He didn’t. You may be confusing it for him saying we likely just complied for the period ending in June 2023.
  8. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    Yeah, we really need to get rid of Dubravka to make this tolerable.
  9. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    Guessing he ultimately wouldn't have been much less than Thiaw. Guehi is probably like a £6-8m annual premium on Thiaw. Seems worth it to me.
  10. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    If this gets done we’d have the option of a pretty intriguing back five (with Botman still to return)… Hall — Kelly — Guehi — Schar — Trips/Tino In theory that would also allow us to remove the weak RW position, though I don't know exactly what that front 5 would look like.
  11. I can’t tell if you’re just making up a number or not. Seems impossible and believable at the same time.
  12. Going to make a world of difference in ~5 years.
  13. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    It is funny that we created chances and scored goals at rates on par with all but the two title challengers while leaking goals for fun at times, but we mostly all want a RW first anyway. There's plenty of good reasons for that as well as the fact that a new, shiny forward is just more fun, but there's definitely a case to be made that this could be more impactful.
  14. My based on nothing at all theory is that Gallagher was as appalled as many of us at them moving on from Poch and he's probably made it known how he feels.
  15. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    I'm sure this board would handle the 34 year old CB duo of Sven and Guehi with complete patience and understanding.
  16. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    He has two years left on his contract at Crystal Palace and has been valued at more than £70million. Chelsea, his former club, are due 20 per cent of the profit on any deal. Guéhi joined Palace for £18million three years ago having come through Chelsea’s academy, and the west London club have the right to match any bids from other clubs. Fucking Chelsea.
  17. timeEd32

    Marc Guehi

    Well that would be fun.
  18. timeEd32

    Anthony Gordon

    I agree it probably is. The end of June just has me a little spooked to be honest.
  19. Yeah, I think they are wrong pending outgoings / new, meaningful sponsorships. But hopefully not.
  20. I don't think there's any reason to think there's some big problem behind the scenes. Some things may have been delayed or re-evaluated with Mitchell coming in, but the main issue is that we likely just don't have a lot of money to spend and we really need outgoings.
  21. timeEd32

    Anthony Gordon

    The Gordon / Gomez swap would have genuinely been one of the worst deals the club has ever done, so I really hope that's nonsense. But I think if Liverpool put £90m+ on the table I'd want us to take it. I'd hate it and I don't want it to happen, but I think the end result is we'd end up with a more balanced and better overall squad.
  22. Couple comments from the Sheffield United side: "Will Osula to Newcastle is rumoured to be £10,000,000 + £5,000,000 in add-ons, and we usually get a cheeky sell on clause in there. It is an absolute no-brainer for United at this amount as it's no secret we're cutting it fine financially. Osula’s a very good prospect, but he's not a regular starter. He's been sensational in the U21s, but he hasn't been able to hit a barn door in the first team, and he's not had consistent opportunities to do that." "Osula's looked very good in pre-season as well coming in off the left-hand side, but, and it's a big but, we can't turn down that sort of money, particularly if we want some more starters to come in. There are rumours that we’re in for the likes of Michael Cooper, these permanent additions need to be funded from somewhere and I think you can't reject that sort of offer personally." Sounds intriguing, though annoying that he specifically mentions coming in from the left.
  23. This may not be so funny in 30 days time.
  24. Yeah, not saying it was a solution in June. But would seem an obvious move in January or for July 1. Only difference from what you said is once extended the five years are spread across the remainder of the fee, so there’s £2-3m more in amortization savings depending on when it was done.
  25. If he’s really only on a 3.5 year deal we could give him an extension that massively increases his wages and still save a few million per year overall. It seems unlikely to me that wouldn’t have been one of our first cost saving measures.
×
×
  • Create New...