Heron

Money aside - If I was McClaren I'd be fielding 11 kids and dropping the full team watching Newcastle get humped and then walk straight after the game without making any interview. Would teach the senior players a lesson and would save him the grief he is inevitably going to receive from now on. I actually think despite him being completely uninspiring he is an okay bloke and wouldn't want to see him abused with loads of vitriol. This has been a sinking ship for years and fitting a few new panels to cover the numerous holes in our hull isn't gonna fix it. The ship needs rebuilding.

He should quite simply fuck off.

nobody wanted them, so to be fair they've f***ed off and probably done something better with their lives we're getting the club we deserve

Apparently the most goals conceded in a season (38 games) is 89 (Derby). We currently stand at 30 after 14 games...

Bournemouth just scored to bring it level.

Big Geordie

Don't think that's what Fraz is getting at TBF

FYP

Ashley appointed them. So the buck stops with him for promoting the f***ing club secretary to MD. Whilst I agree, Ashley is the only one that is guaranteed to be going nowhere. We need to stop thinking like this though. We haven't done enough as a fanbase to make him want to fuck off.

We cannot even get a Red card because none of our players give that much of a fuck to kick some cunt.

McClaren needs to walk today because otherwise it's gonna get a whole lot worse for him.

That would require a leader.

No bollocks at all. Strolling off the pitch with none of them talking to each other at half time. Why the aren't any of them telling each other to get their heads out their arses.

We're just laughable from top to bottom.

What do you mean. Elliott is the first name on the teamsheet at the moment... #tinhat Having no other keepers doesn't stop him from being s***. Haha aye and having the other ten play dismally also makes him the best of the bad bunch atm. Fuck me we are shit.

What do you mean. Elliott is the first name on the teamsheet at the moment... #tinhat

3-0 Palace.

That's only true if the ground is full every week, which it isn't. Which is why I boycotted when I believed it was a United effort. You could say an extra person might turn up and show discontent from one week to the next... That doesn't make any sense heza, sorry. It doesn't make sense or you just choose not to understand it... It doesn't make any sense because we're talking about pumping money into the club. You boycotted a game and fair play but I assume you still paid for it, and this season you're still paying for it. I think I prefer the "can't whack the habit, need to bring my kids, etc" stuff to the idea of a one man protest making any difference tbh. It's not a one man protest if more join. Which is my whole point. If people like myself join those for a boycott then those who boycott shoudl join for sit-ins or other in ground protests. Even if it's for the sake of one or a few games. It's strength in numbers that matters and whether that be in the ground or out is almost irrelevant because most the cash comes from those outside the ground now anyways watching on Sky. No your going to the games and your putting money into his pocket whilst he takes the p*ss and he will continue to do so as long as the likes of you keep attending. Got nothing to do with peoples circumstances and reasoning if you attend your doing nothing to change anything as he doesn't give a f*** if you boo and call him s***; as he has your money whilst laughing his tits off. The boycott of one game is f*** all and the only way anything will happen is a mass boycott over a period of time but you keep making your excuses and keep putting money into his back pocket. Anyone who attends deserves everything they get and in my opoinion are two faced when complaining about things. Your right the 'sheep' will continue to attend mathes and you deserve everything you get by doing so. He doesn't give a shit if one or two people don't turn up either. He does give a shit if the masses do either though, as has been shown before. I agree that mass boycott's is the best form of protest, I just believe it also needs to be organised and orchestrated so that the masses do it and not just odds and sods who are replaced by day trippers. TBH I can see why you see some people as two faced but you cannot tar everyone with that same brush. It's actually laughable that some of you seem to consider not going as the only form of protest that you can do / achieves anything when helping organise protests and putting them into action is even more effort so to rubbish what the likes of AO do (unless it's boycotting) is just daft. My point is as it always has been that we need to be joining each other in protest both in and out the ground. Which is what AO organised very well actually. People should be putting what they think is the best form of protest to one side and just joining each other to oust these cunts. Saying "my protest is the only thing that works" is exactly why no protest has entirely worked to date.

We'll be beaten next weekend like.

If everyone just stopped going I guarantee it would force instant change. An empty stadium would do far more good in the grand scheme of things than you shouting (on your own) "Get out of our club" at Ashley who is more often than not, not even there anyway. They got a fright when best part of 20k didn't turn up for Spurs last season but then everyone ran back for the next game. I agree but for AO to work they need as many people on board as possible and that includes those in the ground. Therefore, you have to do things both in and out to create enough support for back to back boycotts to gain significant traction. Odd ones here or there don't matter, you need Spurs style boycotts in consecutive fixtures.

That's only true if the ground is full every week, which it isn't. Which is why I boycotted when I believed it was a United effort. You could say an extra person might turn up and show discontent from one week to the next... That doesn't make any sense heza, sorry. It doesn't make sense or you just choose not to understand it... It doesn't make any sense because we're talking about pumping money into the club. You boycotted a game and fair play but I assume you still paid for it, and this season you're still paying for it. I think I prefer the "can't whack the habit, need to bring my kids, etc" stuff to the idea of a one man protest making any difference tbh. It's not a one man protest if more join. Which is my whole point. If people like myself join those for a boycott then those who boycott shoudl join for sit-ins or other in ground protests. Even if it's for the sake of one or a few games. It's strength in numbers that matters and whether that be in the ground or out is almost irrelevant because most the cash comes from those outside the ground now anyways watching on Sky.