-
Posts
6,601 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by High Five o
-
We are poor, can only play the top 4 teams. Start to have major doubts about Howe. First time I have felt this way as I love him. We are so shit against anything else than the top teams.
-
Deserved. Shambolic performance today. Not sure what’s going on as we have no consistency. Hate ball
-
Nottingham Forest vs. Newcastle United: 10/11/24 @ 14:00 (Sky Sports)
High Five o replied to HaydnNUFC's topic in Football
Tomorrow will be a different test than the last two. Eddie have always got us to play good against better teams. No discredit to Nottingham, but it will be a completely different match. We simply is no good having the ball and breaking down a low block. Going to be interesting to see how we approach this game. -
We can deliver, but usually against «better» sides. Anyone setting up a low block we usually struggle. Hope we have turned a corner now, and can brake teams down again.
-
Get the fuuck in!!!!!!! yes yes yes!
-
«We don’t demand a team that wins, we demand a team that tries» Or has it become the other way around?
-
Fuck you Isak! No fucking composure.
-
Not correct to take out Tonali for Longstaff mind.
-
Jesus Barnes, fuck how poor.
-
Burn again losing his man.
-
Burn man.
-
I like it when they are here when they are shit🎉 Anyways, I like you contribution to this place👌
-
90x10=900 🫡
-
Newcastle United 0-1 Brighton and Hove Albion - 19/10/25
High Five o replied to Disco's topic in Football
Let down by pathetic finishing again. Just no plan and drive when we go forward. Always cutting back . -
Newcastle United 0-1 Brighton and Hove Albion - 19/10/25
High Five o replied to Disco's topic in Football
Like last match vs Everton, we are not scoring like. -
Loan does not count in regards to FFP.
-
-
-
I think the significant part is the transparency and that the burden of proof now is with PL to show a sponsorship deal is not FMV. Giving more transparency make the argument easier for the clubs (us) and its hard for PL to then prove that the deal is not FMV as long as its not fantasy numbers. Shit rule by the way, so subjective.
-
Indeed, that was the transparency part. Just badly worded.
-
This is not correct. Read the verdict, or at least the summary. It was only because of the interest free loans not being taken into account and the time and transparency when ruling the FMV that was deemed unlawful.
-
This is a match when you can not take Barnes off, and we should introduce Osule. Instead we got Longstaff and Miggy.
-
So fucking angry.
-
These matches are the ones that are going to bite us in the ass at the end of the season.
-
We have a striker on the bench, get him on!