-
Posts
41,604 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Stifler
-
Yeah it was, but I’m assuming the land owner got what he wanted. In reality he would have known that the club would have to come up with an offer for the land either ahead of a match, or not long after one.
-
Club will have relented and bought the land, or paid a fee.
-
There is the suggestion that they will get a 3rd points deduction. That could very well be what is the final nail.
-
Yeah. You have to remember that last summer everyone in football thought that the only penalty a club would face is a fine, which no one would care about. It wasn’t until towards Christmas time that Everton got their 1st points deduction, then in the new year when Forest got theirs, end Everton got their 2nd.
-
Aarons was much better, even he hasn’t went on to set the world alight. He was a shocking buy who Ashley only got on the off chance he had half a decent season and he could be sold on for a profit.
-
Fucking hell, so Howe doesn’t play him, we are desperate for outgoings, have an opportunity to sell, and still don’t.
-
Not really, they are what, a month in. Look at Leicester last year. They still have 42 games to play. Momentum is massive in that league. Have it and you can do something like what they are doing now, lose it and you can fall away massively.
-
Quick question. which manager is available and will go there who will be good enough to turn it around?
-
Good wins for Gateshead, and York today. Good starts for both clubs.
-
They beat Everton mate. They are not the world beaters people were going on about ahead of our game last week.
-
Everlol Everlol Everlol
-
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA 2-3
-
Fucking Dawsons reaction, trying to make Soccer Saturday all American and about people jumping all over the place.
-
But last week everyone was telling me that they are a good team and that we would be lucky with a point.
-
But they have the ability to use the leverage because they are allowed to sign inflated sponsorships with anyone they like. We by comparison have to sell players at reduced rates (ASM), and beg them to let us have a new sponsorship.
-
Journalists narrative starting to change.
-
I’m not saying they, but they will likely end up funding part of OT’s rebuild, either directly on the stadium, or others things around it that enables it to happen. He’ll borrow money on Man Utd’s books, and be spending above what PSR currently allows.
-
He wouldn’t use his money though. He’s a master of that with INEOS, and the whole ‘Government should build us a Wembley of the North’ spiel should have made anyone aware of that. He’ll borrow money to Man Utd, some of which will go on massive transfer fees, the rest will end up going to him either in ‘wages’ or via contracts with INEOS and anyone else he has links too. People like him don’t spend their own money.
-
It was beneficial to them under the Glazers, now the Rat is on board, he wants free rein. Naturally he will want to close the door again once he’s had the chance to catch up, but he does want to be able to spend more money.
-
Imminent like our stadium feasibility study, and income big sponsorships.
-
Yeah but now they are realising that they fucked up. Once they start complaining, that is when the rules will change. You already have Chelsea finding every loophole available, Man Utd now complaining, Man City in court. Just fucking scrap PSR.
-
They strike me as a team who will do well against the good teams, then suffer disappointing results elsewhere. They won’t get anywhere long term with their buy and sell policy, and shifting managers all the time.
-
Not seen the incident, but I hope Brighton fans are looking forward to a year of Arsenal fans whinging about it and calling for revenge.
-
This very much. Going into the transfer window after we sold Minteh, and Anderson, we were told that we had to make something like a £15m profit on players this year, however we made a £60m bid for Guehi, so that is £12m more on top of that. We know that we have no players to sell, unless we sold someone like Bruno, Isak, or Gordon, which would then put us a step back regardless.