maybe_next_year

It is very different. As mentioned time and time again, Man Utd and Arsenals reserves can easily beat almost any team in the Premier League, even Wolves first team have a hard time doing that. Man Utd and Arsenal play their reserves still looking for a win, Wolves just threw the match not caring about trying. McCarthy should be fined, or Wolves should get a fine IMO. Point deduction would be taking it too far. i dont think you can really say because wolves didnt try to win the match they should be punished, plenty of teams go to the likes of the top four and dont play to win, but just because he chose to rest players, he should be made to look different to those teams?

i can understand the fan's being annoyed at this decision, but in no way should the FA get involved, its no different to when the likes of arsenal and man u play their reserves

looks like it might not be that full, "limited" areas can have lots of empty seats, doubt we'll be near 50,000 but should still be a good atmosphere.

using images from the other side of the country to advertise their bid

as long as west brom dont make a great come back, it makes our draw at barnsley look alot better.

didnt addidas say the reason why they wernt interested in the stadium naming rights to do with wanting to maintain a long-term commitment to the club? could of just made that up like, but if i havnt would sugest it has everything to do with ashley again... Edit: said they were commited to "on-pitch commitments to the club"

underperforming boro side we look like we deserve a good hiding. could be recipe for disater imo.

jesus christ that forum is awful, its lay out, the fact that they have a thread called "are we a bigger club than newcastle", everything is wrong with it.

howay man, this isnt even football on ssn now.

well this place was always going to go mental when he finally scored wasnt it theres something so wonderful about hearing wor fans singing, been quiet today though.

the worst thing about butt, is that it sounds like this match is FAR from being his worst performance for us ranger!!!!!!!!!!!!

ranger or smith to score first for us?

collocini sounds like hes had a bad game

smith nearly scored, doubt he'll ever score.

on the bench, nothing wrong with him, just not picked.

did he not get bought by the board as a replacement for speed, who was also sold by the board? and SBR didnt have a clue about either deal untill the last min? or was that just a rumour?

well that came out of the blue

instead of having a go at either butt or smith, why cant we see that both are poor atm?

"got away from nicky butt" just as i was about to post an "in defence of butt" post aswell.

and guess the result.... howay butt, prove us all wrong!

yup on another note: bbc newcastle: " lets be brutally honest, shola isnt going to play for england" glad we've got that cleared up then

http://i.imagehost.org/0024/6945512-md.jpg summed up perfectly in that pic

"sunderland were so poor", i bet wor Al loved getting to say that. on another note, i quite like this fulham side, they play some decent stuff and i'v always been a huge fan of Zamora.

really getting quite dissolusioned with the yes we can campaign. at the start i wasnt convinced, then they had just about managed to convince me, was planning on investing in the idea. untill swansea and the bloke with the beard handing our leaflets and a couple of weeks of little action despite this only being a 6 week campaign