Jump to content

Wallsendmag

Member
  • Posts

    9,835
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Wallsendmag

  1. Bit harsh like. The thread had turned to shit but he certainly wasn't the only culprit if you look at the last couple of pages.
  2. Edwards is an enemy of this club. He spends most of his time trolling the fans and his desperation for this takeover to fall through is there for all to see. I don't know if he has any inside info or if Keith doesn't know as much as he lets on but I'll always side with the person who is with me, not against me. Whatever the outcome, it won't be because of anything Luke Edwards or Keith has done.
  3. Luke is a troll, but he was the first to report the Willock deal and first to confirm Choudry wasn't coming so regardless of the fact he is a wind up merchant of the highest order it is clear not everything he says is nonsense. I do agree though that he comes across as having the viewpoint the takeover has no chance when I don't see how that can be the case give arbitration etc. Means nowt. He's on good terms with Bruce so he could get stuff like that off him no problem. Off field matters such as the takeover are different altogether. Off field matters are different, but again, he was first to confirm issues with the deal in the summer and the first to confirm it had fallen through so unfortunately on two bits of really shit news he was right. We can't just discredit his sources because he's a dick. Anyway, back to the confirmation we have have about Keith being "in direct contact" with those involved in the bid... He's probably the only reporter up here still on good terms with Bruce so for transfers and team news he could well have a direct source there. Considering he's been against Staveley and her Consortium from the start I very much doubt they are giving him any inside info.
  4. Luke is a troll, but he was the first to report the Willock deal and first to confirm Choudry wasn't coming so regardless of the fact he is a wind up merchant of the highest order it is clear not everything he says is nonsense. I do agree though that he comes across as having the viewpoint the takeover has no chance when I don't see how that can be the case give arbitration etc. Means nowt. He's on good terms with Bruce so he could get stuff like that off him no problem. Off field matters such as the takeover are different altogether.
  5. He's absolutely desperate for it not to happen. It's nailed on somebody will twat him when fans are allowed back in
  6. Caulkin got just about everything wrong regarding the takeover last year, which is why he's hardly mentioned it since. Whatever people think of Keith, he's in direct contact with people involved in the deal.
  7. The obvious question is how did this get through the fit and proper persons test? Then you realsie this takeover had no chance of upsetting the applecart so there was no need for "the big 6" to get involved. Feel for Burnley mind, this doesn't look good.
  8. A few press people have commented that with the empty stadiums it becomes apparent how vocal Dubravka is compared to Darlow. Seemingly it was very obvious during the Cup game at The Emirates. Aside from that Dubravka is the far more commanding goalkeeper and shot stopping they are pretty similar. Darlow has came in and done far better than anyone expected but for me, now that Dubravka is fit he should be back in goal.
  9. Wallsendmag

    Joelinton

    I know Tom, his shop is just up the road from me. He is a Toon fan like!
  10. The Graeme Jones effect will se us to a 3-1 win. Brace for Big Joe and a farewell goal from Matt Ritchie.
  11. Wallsendmag

    Jacob Murphy

    He wasn't very good under Rafa either tbf.
  12. Wallsendmag

    Jacob Murphy

    Not watching today but he's way below what's required at Premier League Level. It's one thing looking good against League 2 plodders in the 2nd Round of the League Cup or out on loan in the Championship but he's not cut out for it at this level.
  13. This is what we need. Fans can't get in the ground so a good old fashioned players revolt could be handy.
  14. That was me who put that on twitter.
  15. People vouched for him that he was genuine and would pay up so as I said on December 9th, I was happy to take the bet on. He pays £500 to the foodbank if the takeover hasn't gone through by January 31st and if it did I would (have been absolutely delighted!) to hand over £500 to the Food Bank. Just seen this mate, I’m good for my word and I’ve posted proof every time I’ve donated Wallsendmag[/member] I know you have pal and people vouched for you at the time that you were genuine. Then it’s a deal and looking likely I’m out of pocket I can honestly, hand on heart, say I'm gutted to be winning this bet even though I always expected to. At least it's to a very worthy cause. You’re a good man and like you say it’s a worthy cause, not that I’m. Out of pocket exactly as we donate that amount every January anyway... Class
  16. People vouched for him that he was genuine and would pay up so as I said on December 9th, I was happy to take the bet on. He pays £500 to the foodbank if the takeover hasn't gone through by January 31st and if it did I would (have been absolutely delighted!) to hand over £500 to the Food Bank. Just seen this mate, I’m good for my word and I’ve posted proof every time I’ve donated Wallsendmag[/member] I know you have pal and people vouched for you at the time that you were genuine. Then it’s a deal and looking likely I’m out of pocket I can honestly, hand on heart, say I'm gutted to be winning this bet even though I always expected to. At least it's to a very worthy cause.
  17. People vouched for him that he was genuine and would pay up so as I said on December 9th, I was happy to take the bet on. He pays £500 to the foodbank if the takeover hasn't gone through by January 31st and if it did I would (have been absolutely delighted!) to hand over £500 to the Food Bank. Just seen this mate, I’m good for my word and I’ve posted proof every time I’ve donated Wallsendmag[/member] I know you have pal and people vouched for you at the time that you were genuine.
  18. People vouched for him that he was genuine and would pay up so as I said on December 9th, I was happy to take the bet on. He pays £500 to the foodbank if the takeover hasn't gone through by January 31st and if it did I would (have been absolutely delighted!) to hand over £500 to the Food Bank.
  19. You didn’t make the bet did you? Yes I made it. You didn't like. You ignored it and continued to call him out. I did. On this thread. 9th December at 8pm.
  20. I wish more people could grasp this. Nobody on Newcastle online will be privy to any inside info on a £350m deal involving Newcastle United and Saudi Arabia. Anything put on here is either attention seeking or pure guesswork.
  21. I'm pretty confident that I'll win my bet with HTT here and this won't be completed on or before January 31st.
  22. Craig Hope's the journo Bruce had the bust up with last year isn't he?
  23. Heads they win, tails we lose. He's staying regardless so frankly I couldn't give a fuck, although if there is still a very slim chance of a takeover it is extinguished on relegation. Even then I'm caring less and less about that after almost a year of nothing happening.
×
×
  • Create New...