Rosenrot

Well this has ruined my day already

Kind of sick of De Marco's shit now

Of course a failed jurisdiction application followed by a failed CAT case will mean even more legal costs for the Premier League to pay so it's not quite a "no lose" situation.

good one mate

Without a doubt

I’m really gutted. Really feels we’ve been screwed over by the powers that be

It may be conducted via Zoom or Teams.

the sale wasn’t ‘close’. The sale was done, subject to regulatory approval ie the fit and proper owner test.

“I am satisfied that the requested short extension of seven days will not prejudice the listing of the hearing of the Jurisdiction Application and is reasonable given the concurrent demands on the Defendant in preparing for the arbitration proceedings.”

It will be huge football news regardless I think

I don't accept this comment at all

Love it when this thread is bumped like

Dunno mate. He might decide to buy a stainless steel Casio though.

I reckon MA spent most of the flight on the Argos website, putting together a list of what he's going to spend his 300m on.

Picking up a Nandos for the lads

https://www.flightradar24.com/EDC742/27fe27a1

If the PL had changed their position we'd probably know about it. They've probably gone for a jolly.

Still amuses me that he went from Real Madrid to Newcastle. Imagine what he thought when he first visited our training ground?

In fact it would be weird it MBS hadn’t lobbied on behalf of PIF, because if he thinks its a good deal, its in his interests for PIF to make as much money as possible — that’s the entire point of an investment fund.

Aye so when the Foreign Office and/or the PM lobbies on behalf of British companies, which happens all the time, that means that Boris Johnson is a shadow director? Lobbying means nowt.

I think we could do with a new badge like. Would be good to signify a new era for the club.

I’m with @Fantail Breeze to be honest. Nothing particularly interesting about that letter. It doesn’t really matter. All that matters is whether the PL followed their own rules and didn’t act in an anti-competitive manner.

A lot of people do in the North East like

I guess it will be up to the court to decide the definition of a "shadow director" in the context of the test. I don't think the PL will be able to unilaterally decide what it means.

It depends what the rules say to be honest. If they are not given arbitrary discretion, then no, it's not up to them to make their own judgement. If they have to make the decision based on a clear set of rules, those rules are the only thing that matters. They can't change the criteria mid-application because they don't like the outcome. If they are given arbitrary discretion, it still might be anti-competitive which is of course unlawful on public policy grounds.