Jump to content

Hanshithispantz

Member
  • Posts

    52,680
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hanshithispantz

  1. Triggs makes a good point like, I'd never even considered that. Like Deuce says technology is probably way off being able to cover offsides correctly. It'd have to be near instant.
  2. No the issue is with reversing decisions regularly, it cannot be good.
  3. The process of assessing whether play is offside. The one we used before this was introduced. e the linesman's decision.
  4. I was actually for this too btw But howay man, we cannot have that shite every week.
  5. Aye it's obviously offside, it never needed to be perfect though. That shite isn't good for the game. Eh? You're either offside or you're not. I don't think you've understood what I've said there like, the process never needed to be perfect.
  6. Aye it's obviously offside, it never needed to be perfect though. That shite isn't good for the game. So it's ok for tight offside's to be incorrectly called? It always has been, for over a hundred years, so yeah. There's a point where too much technological advancement is pushed into the game and based off that goal this is it.
  7. It has nothing to do with wether it's the correct decition or not.
  8. Aye it's obviously offside, it never needed to be perfect though. That shite isn't good for the game.
  9. I operated correctly, the concept is a good one, but that was an absolute farce I'd be all for blatant offsides being overturned but it's impossible to keep any consistency, who decides the cut off point? Being potentialy an inch offside was never really a problem but if they're to use the technology correctly (or try to) many of those close calls are going to end up like this.
  10. I was all for it like but it cannot work if that's anything to go by, fine margin calls have never been an issue.
  11. This is fucking stupid like, everyone who claimed video officiating was shit was right
  12. Am I missing something here? What's the issue? Couldn't make everything out but there's a bloke standing on someone's car for one.
  13. Not really relevant in any way, but an excuse to post this again.
  14. Speaking to the media in his native country, Jokanović was asked about Cairney and said: “Yes, he’s good. He (Benitez) asked for him and they offered £20million, but we did not let him go. “He is not for Newcastle, there is no business there, he fits in at Fulham. “When the team has problems the ball always goes to him and he keeps it.”
  15. completely forgot they were relegated
  16. it's not even because it's them, that's actually the worst premiership top I can remember since atleast the new Millennium hit.
  17. Would be canny funny if Skjelbred found out through this forum.
  18. :lol: beaten by those shite tory cunts
  19. Anita's only 28, he can still get a decent long term contract elsewhere. Gouffran is 31, he'll likely be more willing to accept a shorter contract on lower wages. That's probably the gist of it, Rafa won't be offering Gouffran a contract if he reckons it's shite for the club He's obviously not going to be anywhere near the starting XI next season.
×
×
  • Create New...