Hanshithispantz

What a bloke

Chelsea have the daft Conference league to play in, Liverpool would have to be massively off it to not beat them

Won't Villa make up the difference from the wages they're paying through merit payments for finishing higher in the league?

Slot will want 90 points. Nowt worse than winning the league purely because the competition was shite - not sure how I would know that like.

First sentence "He's a good player no doubt"

Imagine how much they would have won the league by with Tonali instead. All the best.

Her main point was that they cannot let the women's game become over dominated by men. Coaches, officials & pundits. The women's game needs help to grow but you would assume the eventual idea is to have men being a minor role in their sport in the same way women are in the mens. The host mentions Wright by name, forcing her to either backtrack, or give her opinion which she did. It was a proper stitcher move, she's put her on the spot and forced her to talk about one of her colleagues, I don't think she said anything bad about him though and his refusal of her apology seems a bit over the top.

Absolutely mental

We'll finish ahead of Arsenal still man. They have Bournemouth sandwiched between 2 PSG games, then Anfield 4 days later for Liverpool's after party.

Wet flannel of a man. The audio clip is on Spotify from 38 mins I'm all for hoying a woman back in her box like but other than her response being a bit clunky it's about what you would expect her to think. Proper catty move from the other lass namedropping Wrighty.

Absolute beast Mateta

Disgraceful decision

Always nice when a referee is so shite that he reverses his shit decisions against you by being even shitter for the opposition.

Never a pen that like

What a moron

First time watching football?

Why stop the game?

That's genuinely one of the worst decisions you'll see

This red is fucking embarrassing

She was speaking on a 'Women's Hour' show, I assume where women talk about feminism and shite. "I’ve worked with Ian a long time and, you know, I think he’s a brilliant broadcaster, but I think he’s aware of just how much he’s doing in the women’s game. I think he should be aware of that." "The fact of the matter is, there is a limited amount of spaces available. If we had a situation where there was an equal opportunity in the men’s game for broadcasters and coaches that there is in the women’s game, it’s a free for all." "But that’s not the case. I can’t dominate the men’s game in the way that, you know, you used Ian as an example." "I think we need to be conscious and we need to make sure that women are not being blocked from having a pathway into broadcasting in the women’s game." It reads like she's responding to a question using Wright as an example of something I'm assuming she would have been talking about (either on the show or before) it doesn't sound like she's just started blasting Ian Wright and throwing accusations about

Cannot really see the issue with her comments like, if Ian Wright disagreed then what exactly has he been advocating for?

She obviously meant 1 goal every other game but ofcourse a presenter is going to get ripped to bits for that Edit: ah that was 3 years ago and we're now talking about something else

Villa are juggling Rashford and Watkins. As much as I love Isak he obviously struggles with playing almost every minute he's available and that will be even more evident (again) with Europe next year.