Stottie

Looked leggy and were completely outplayed. Our defence, esp. the CHs, looked completely unprepared for press and were lucky to not be caught out before Bruno was. We were lucky to not go two down earlier in the second half, esp. with the out of play goal. We failed to adjust to a soft referee and should have done more fouling ourselves. Congrats to Bournemouth who played well and didn't look remotely like a team with many injury issues.

Imagine if this is his last appearance for us Don't suppose Miggy will get another go at SJP either.

They've done us here, with their press, the clinical finishes, and the fouling, but the ref hasn't helped. Guy clearly stands on Bruno's foot and nothing given. Mackem on US commentary says "no intent" or some other bollocks.

Pards stroking the chromedome. What an alpha move.

That's what I like to hear. Before I looked it up, I imagined Bournemouth was a bogey team who'd beaten us several times, but our record against them under Eddie is P6 W1 D4 L1. The win was in the FA Cup. We've had some bum results and very damp squib performances this season, but none of them so far were after five or more straight wins. That gives me hope for today.

As Wilson replacements go, DCL is very close. I reckon he'd do well for us. He's not struck me as a goalscorer but does more CF stuff than Wilson ever did. Wilson would go for months averaging 10 passes a game. It didn't matter so much because his instincts got us lots of moocher goals. Widely mocked rumoured Eddie targets include Scotty McT and Conor Gallagher, who are now tearing it up in new leagues. Elanga and Ekitike too. This suggests he knows what he is doing and can judge a player.

Thierry Henry is pretty much the PL era's greatest player but played in a way better team. Check out his teammates, listed here by who set him up. Young Cesc is just below the cutoff and played with Henry in that CL final they lost to Barca with the Jens Lehman sending off. By comparison, here's Isak with us. All good lads, but not many of em get in Arsenal's invincibles.

Dunno if serious, but DCL has similar numbers to Bournemouth era Callum Wilson, who actually played in a higher scoring team. If Eddie could get NUFC era Wilson out of him, he'd be useful. Out of contract in the summer, so last chance for Everton to get anything for him. Its not as if Everton have much PSR headroom to say no even if lowballed. Since weird swapsies are all the PSR rage, one option would be to loan them Wilson himself because he is "back in February" (!!)

Played well for us in the periods where he was not serving a clown-car manager, so thank you and good luck to him. Probably the best pressing forward we've had, which would still matter a lot more if the team as a whole had not leveled up to the extent that it has. Never stopped running. Great smile and an almost hilarious lack of English. I wonder if he speaks any Geordie. As a word of right wing caution, Mbeumo is currently on what looks like a hotter goal streak (yes, goals scored exceeding expected goals) than Miggy was in 22-23 or on-loan Willock in 20-21. Another player banging in way beyond xG this season is yes, good ol' Chris Wood. Be careful what you wish for.

Shola the Mackem Killer would have very good "shot creating actions" stats. Those long legs were very good at catching up with his first touch and giving him a half yard. Unfortunately most of the subsequent shots ended up in Row Z.

That goal was his best "Ice cold in Alex" moment since the lob of Fabinski. Celebrating before it hits the net. Unstoppable at the moment. But for the Salah revival, a strong shout for best player in the league. fwiw Those arseholes at the Guardian moved him down three places in their "Top 100 players" list a few weeks ago. He's below Kai Havertz and Cody Gakpo.

I think it might have just been positive PR for him, but I remember someone saying Tonali had the hardest shot in the squad. After Sunday's evidence, I respectfully disagree.

Looking forward to this, albeit with illogical feelings about us coming back from break, even though we faced full-strength Arsenal away just a week ago. Any kind of scrappy win will do me. Isak has a great chance to beat Shearer and Willock with seven in a row, but that is completely secondary.

With Murphy fit and playing well, and no 23-24-style injury crisis, Miggy's stock is now lower than the summer. This opens more scope for selling a low, ahem more realistic, fee.

Probably not a coincidence that Murphy has done much better since we pushed Bruno up close to him. Just as Bruno was highly involved on the right when Trippier and Miggy were doing well. Only exceptional players can do well with little support. Even isak struggled to make an impression when he was isolated up front. I would question how much game time Barnes has been given in a team near full strength with a balanced and functioning system. I think Barnes has done reasonably well for us, and IMO was a good buy. It is mostly super stupid PSR rules, the need to allocate your resources with surgical precision, that questions the deal. Since PSR also rules out buying unproven potential that does not come to fruition, this also pushes the club toward Tino, Hall, Barnes type conservative signings and not some cheap, potentially high ceiling signing from abroad. Staveley said on several occasions that the club could not afford to make transfer mistakes.

Accrington CH has to cut that cross out. It looks like he half hesitated and went with the wrong foot.

Too early for Tonali. He's also lucky enough to be playing #6 with two ballwinning #8s. Makalele did not have Frank Lampard tackling and harranging defenders like our #8s. To his credit, Tonali was impressive against Arsenal with no Bruno in the team, so my hopes are high.

After the Ashworth debacle at Man U, you have to wonder how much of Brighton's success is down to their system, and that massive loan from the owner that PSR doesn't care about, not some wonderous performance by any particular individuals in their system. Potter took all of his staff to Chelsea but couldn't get a tune out of very good players. Even when Howe joined us and we were losing 4-0 to Leicester, there were still clear signs of improvement over Bruce. This was not necessarily the players instantly grasping what Howe's ultimate tactical destination would be. It was likely more stop-gap tactics to improve organization etc. until Trippier and Bruno arrived. On a similar tip, I think Klopp gets a lot of performance credit actually due to whoever out of the Moneyball bods said "we must sign Salah". He wasn't Klopp's choice.

I guess this is on an earlier page, but the final is Sun March 16. If still in Europa, Spurs would play three days before on Mar 13. There would be a CL game for Liverpool on Mar 11 or Mar 12. Assuming we get through, I'd rather face Spurs than Liverpool. Most of it is down to Mo Salah winning games on his own like a cheat code.

There are many examples of players who didn't get a proper chance at Chelsea, like Salah and de Bruyne, or if you prefer, Hall and Livramento. Their current star is someone who didn't get a chance at Man City. There are some great ex City players out there. Antony is ex Man U, and has been given dozens of games without producing. There are not many examples of brilliant ex Man U players. Chelsea sign or train good players but don't make the most of them. Man U's recruitment and academy are nowhere near Chelsea's.

Liverpool still scoring for fun, but that's 11 conceded in their last six games. After conceding about half a goal a game for the first dozen matches. We've tightened up and have conceded five in the last six matches, four of them to Brentford.

If we are fecked by PSR and can't buy a striker/RW, we need Barnes because Gordon is our second choice central striker.

Have a hallelujah! I reckon Salah is the greatest player in Premier League history, now above Henry. Salah deserves far more credit from the Scousers, some of which should be taken from Klopp. They need a Salah statue, not a Klopp one.

Its blunder of the season if Man City could have bought him for 80Mish last June, with PSR meaning we would have sold. What a complete shitshow those rules are.

I thought Tonali was a bizarre signing given our needs, our budget, and the limited record of Italians in English football, but have been proved wrong. I thought this because he played in a double pivot at Milan and didn't do something that obviously fitted our system when we bought him. He's now operating mostly as a single pivot, but with one press-resistant, foul-drawing, key-passing eight and another dynamic ball-carrying, ultra-destroying, former-striker one. It was not obvious that Tonali would thrive doing this, but its looking very good on the evidence so far. My overall theory though is that if you sign good enough players, you can teach em a new system. This also applies to barroom discussions of players from the past. The better ones would likely thrive in modern football too, but would merely learn different skillsets. They would not be stuck in whatever outdated role they did in the 1980s, 1990s, or whenever.