LRD

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11728/8813571/Transfer-news-Blackpool-are-eyeing-former-Newcastle-striker-Nile-Ranger

I hope he's been training that left foot of his. Could do with better crosses from our left flank.

Think HP bought over their old sponsor (Autonomy?). Was from the UA website so names there tbf.

Never discount anything with that deluded cunt. He probably thinks he has the body of a 30 year old.

http://i.imgur.com/oZqxAaz.png http://i.imgur.com/j9GJIZJ.png

Worse than Simpson.

He was one of the best performers in the first half of last season.

Regarding the 3rd party ownership thingy, are England the only leagues not to allow that?

Ah, Dyer finally decided to retire.

Was like a circus in there. You'd expect more respect for the dead.

Ah, going only by what .com says. Good then. Only 4 PL clubs yet to officially reveal their home kit (Spurs Monday).

Scheduled for a mid-August reveal so thereabouts I guess.

All depends on whether CP is the only club after him. He's into his last year and that might make adding % sell-on difficult.

http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/39485681.jpg

I'll be happy with a whopping 2m tbh.

The selling clubs like Sporting Lisbon and Spanish clubs sans Real and Barca are in desperate need of funds too.

Ah, Vuckic. That's one youngster I want to see more of. Shame he's made of glass.

Got told he can look for a new club. Effectively transfer-listed.

http://cdn.meme.li/instances/300x300/39483836.jpg

Alright.

Hit the post against Martimo away and made a great save against Everton. Sorry, that didn't make an impression on me.

The 8 HG players is not a requirement. Rather it's a case of being able to register 17 non-HG players only. You can supplement the numbers with your U-21 players (don't count towards quota) if you have a lot of faith in them (mostly not ready in our case). Of course this will leave us desperately short on numbers.

I'm thinking it this way: 1. Table has to be as close as possible when it comes to points. 2. Consider 2 teams already doomed to oblivion i.e. 0 points. We are considering the teams in 17th and 18th with as many points they can get without ensuring survival. 3. As a result of #2, we have to consider 4 wins (over the 2 bottom teams) each for the rest of the 18 teams plus a balance of 1 win/ 1 loss . That would mean a safety mark of around 63 pts (4 wins over bottom 2, 17 losses, 17 wins). Am I making sense? Synapses dulled by afternoon stupor so forgive me if I create more confusion. Edit: Revised.

I think 2 draws give you less points than a win and a loss.

Not that he doesn't want to move. He can't move! /fatjoke