Jump to content

Smal

Member
  • Posts

    10,066
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Smal

  1. Smal

    Chris Hughton

    Oh that? Yeah... horrendous
  2. Smal

    Chris Hughton

    I dunno. Think Stoke might do all right
  3. Can't really see why we'd transfer list Routledge and then go for Keith Treacy
  4. Been rubbish this season anyway
  5. Not necessarily, if you play 4-4-2 you would have the two strikers and two wingers as being primarily attacking players and could still accomodate a box to box midfielder. It depends if the 3 attacking mids were all given free roles or if they are expected to put a shift in going backwards as well. That would be fine if Marveaux, Ben Arfa and/or N'Zog were actually willing to put in a defensive shift, which I don't think they will. Marveaux is very lazy defensively from what I've heard, and I don't see Ben Arfa being one to be tied down to a position like left midfield
  6. If Marveaux, HBA and N'Zog were all to play at once, we'd definitely need two defensive midfielders on the pitch too. Cabaye will have to stay back with Tioté, which is fine by me
  7. Think that's more because Bolton didn't have the money due to shelling out a ridiculous amount for Johan Elmander a week or two before Guthrie signed for us
  8. Why? He offers us very little, especially if we're after Matuidi and going to play a 4-3-3. He's a decent player when given a run in the team. Proved that at Bolton and even with us for a while. Good backup for us
  9. Please don't sell Guthrie, Pards
  10. From what I've seen and heard, Forster is probably better than Krul at the moment. Krul's a good shot stopper, but he doesn't half make some silly mistakes like. Forster has more experience too. Either way, I'd be happy to see Krul or Forster as our first choice next season. Out with the old and all that
  11. Smal

    Chris Hughton

    Confirmed on SSN
  12. nah, Liverpool are planning on a £25m bid for Danny Rose. Sturridge isn't overrated enough for them
  13. I agree. If he's willing to take a pay as you play contract there's nothing to lose How about Matuidi? I'm pretty sure we wouldn't buy him if we got Hargreaves. Why wouldn't we? I don't think we'd be expecting Hargreaves to be able to play for most of the season, so we could get Matuidi anyway. No fee and we wouldn't be losing any money on wages if Hargreaves was on a pay as you play deal, either. Hargreaves could play right back for us anyway when he plays
  14. I agree. If he's willing to take a pay as you play contract there's nothing to lose
  15. Don't want Taarabt anywhere near this club
  16. Two defensive midfielders is ideal for playing a quick counter attacking style 4-2-3-1. See the Dutch's football in Euro 2008. It does however mean you have to have an attacking midfielder (Sneijder in Holland's case). None of Tioté, Cabaye or Matuidi really fit that role
  17. suspended betting seems to mean very little, but hopefully I'm proved wrong
  18. Danny Simpson is a championship player and nothing more. Said it before, but RB should be a priority for us. Simpson is a half decent back up in the prem
  19. bitter Scousers. Absolutely no surprises there. Deluded as well if they think a top 6 finish is possible. Spurs, City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea and Man U all way ahead of them
  20. Great signing. 3 year contract is just about the right length too for him
  21. Can't see him joining us though
  22. We need to go for Pablo Piatti. Can't understand why we wouldn't. One of the best left sided players in Spain, and his team (Almería) were relegated this season, so he'd most likely be interested
  23. Smal

    Lookalikes

    Has the Nile Ranger/Flava Flav one been done yet?
  24. Smal

    Kevin Nolan

    Confirmed this is now
  25. Smal

    Mass Exodus

    Who cares? Just get on with supporting what we have left at the end of the window.
×
×
  • Create New...