Mole_Toonfan

Genuinely sounds like this

Rafa to Everton endless shitposting about to kick off more like.

So are you giving up on the Zaha does nothing point then? Loftus Cheek looks decent but he's played in about 4 games where his team hasn't scored a goal. Nah it's just obvious you don't agree so why push it? but if you want.... this goes back to that season he had in the Championship before Man Utd signed him and Tom Ince had a better season. Stats don't really change my view point, there's a lot of players who get meaningless stats without actually impacting their general performance. I watch him play and 9/10 he does nothing. Townsend stats are not as good but he's a much better player and was a lot more impactful on Saturday and probably will be most of the season.

Nah i watch them play, i feel like their reputation is WAY above what they actually produce. Same goes for Stoke and West Ham players tbh, all the managers in question are utter s*** but the players they have are way overhyped. It's almost like these players are at these clubs for a reason, i'm genuinely dumbfounded why people expect a team which have been bad for so long ( this goes further back than this season) to suddenly turn it around. I mean before Chelsea they had no only gotten zero points but zero goals ! can't think a single team in history which people would expect certain relegation under the same scenario but there seems to be a certain confidence they'll be fine for some reason. Based on absolutely fuck all.

Because look at what he does well, he's not someone who is going to be on the end of attacks. Based on his skillset i don't believe he's a natural attacking midfielder, he just plays there because Palace have fuck all else. Although in fairness to him, the only reason he didn't have an assist against us is because Van Aanholt some how didn't tap in his goal bound pass.

Players they have they are trash man. Zaha is probably the most overrated player in the league and Townsend doesn't make them a good team. The rest are utter garbage, the best player is probably Loftus Cheek but seeing as Hodgson won't play him that's irrelevant. I'm not sure how many games they need to lose without scoring a damn goal before people are going to realize they are s***. How can you say Loftus Cheek is better than Zaha? Quite comfortably so, Zaha as i said is one of the most overrated players around. He gets hype because he completes a few dribbles now and then but ultimately does f*** all. Don't think i have seen such a nothing player get so much praise, on the other hand Loftus Cheek is fantastic and someone i'd love us to have. How many wingers for poor teams got 7 goals and 9 assists last season I wonder? And this season he was injured for nearly all their bad run and first game back he scores against Chelsea Loftus Cheek on the other hand has got zero goals and zero assists in more games. It's almost like you're talking s*** again Aye because stats mean someone is a better player Loftus Cheek isn't someone who will get goals and assists, doesn't mean he's not better. He does everything else fantastically well, Zaha is someone who goes missing for 95% of a game and does a highlight clip now and again as Saturday showed. He was a non factor after the first 15 minutes. I have watched Palace a handful of times outside of Saturday and Loftus Cheek has been their best player every single time and it's not been close.

Players they have they are trash man. Zaha is probably the most overrated player in the league and Townsend doesn't make them a good team. The rest are utter garbage, the best player is probably Loftus Cheek but seeing as Hodgson won't play him that's irrelevant. I'm not sure how many games they need to lose without scoring a damn goal before people are going to realize they are s***. We had this discussion yesterday and I made my position canny clear like. For a start, I don't agree that they're utter trash. Zaha, Loftus-Cheek, Townsend, Benteke, Sakho are all good players. If you don't rate them, fair enough, but I rate them well above being certs for relegation. So that's that bit sorted. You're judging them pre-Hodgson. 7 games and no goals under De Boer doesn't mean the players are trash, as you put it. Everyone knows he was attempting to get them to play a brand of football that just wasn't working out for them. Since Hodgson has come in they've beaten Chelsea and should have got a point away to us. Trash indeed. I honestly can't be arsed beyond that tbh. Meh they are all names to me, Sakho has been rubbish for ages, as has Benteke, already touched on Zaha and Townsend is well documented. Their standing is way beyond their actual performances in their careers. Trash, gonna be funny when they go down with less than 25 points considering this hype tbh.

Players they have they are trash man. Zaha is probably the most overrated player in the league and Townsend doesn't make them a good team. The rest are utter garbage, the best player is probably Loftus Cheek but seeing as Hodgson won't play him that's irrelevant. I'm not sure how many games they need to lose without scoring a damn goal before people are going to realize they are s***. How can you say Loftus Cheek is better than Zaha? Quite comfortably so, Zaha as i said is one of the most overrated players around. He gets hype because he completes a few dribbles now and then but ultimately does fuck all. Don't think i have seen such a nothing player get so much praise, on the other hand Loftus Cheek is fantastic and someone i'd love us to have.

I'd want Manquillo out of the team, so i agree with Kanji tbh.

Aye that's true, he's one of those players that even if he doesn't play that well as an individual he makes the whole team play better. That was clear as day against Palace.

Players they have they are trash man. Zaha is probably the most overrated player in the league and Townsend doesn't make them a good team. The rest are utter garbage, the best player is probably Loftus Cheek but seeing as Hodgson won't play him that's irrelevant. I'm not sure how many games they need to lose without scoring a damn goal before people are going to realize they are shit.

Crocodile tears? Nah, I just don't buy it. Have a lot of time for Elliot (whey, maybe not as an ideal number one ) and can't recall seeing many if any interviews in the press or anywhere yet where he hasn't come across as being absolutely sound. As recently as this evening he's tried to sell Merino to Barcelona, he's Alan Pardew the goalkeeper.

Other fans won't admit it, but the club in general are box office tbh The numbers don't lie, we wouldn't be on so much if we weren't making Sky money.

They have started just as well as us though tbf, i know Burnley are not traditionally a team you would be happy with a draw but i think i would tbh. Will be an incredibly tight and boring game, hopefully we can knick the 3 points.

Growing sense among supporters line pisses me off tbh, mainly you know damn fucking well they just made that up on the spot the lieing milk sniffing cunt.

If he wants to keep his job he'll need to win at least 3 of those imo. Unfortunately for him i don't think they will.

I'd be surprised if West Ham don't change their mind with the next 6 weeks.

Don't see how it's possible when we are signing Messi in January.

Championship best league confirmed.

Think Hughes has got a few games in him yet tbh, Koeman and Bilic i wouldn't be surprised if both go before their next games.

He shouldn't be sacked at all. But he could be doing a better job. Hes's very specific in his requirements and asks a lot from his players, without trying to limit their weakneses. That i agree with completely, never denied he's doing a perfect job or anything. He obviously could/should be doing better. Also i would agree that he's very specific in his requirements and hasn't really adapted, said the same about him towards the end of his Dortmund run and wondered if he learnt anything. Seems like not but even so, i still think it's a wait and see approach and it's not an easy job to succeed at if these are the expectations.

They have less points than us. That's the issue, not the fact they can't compete with the top three Aye but they won't for long, don't get me wrong it would be a laugh if they did but i can't see it. I mean Burnley and Watford are in the same area Table means fuck all at the moment. They are 3 points off Chelsea in 4th and that's the objective, get it and it's a good season considering what's above them.

This isn't a reason to not get rid of Klopp, but i genuinely get the impression that people think that if someone else came in they'd be a lock for CL places. ( hell they might finish there anyway) I'm really not seeing that, they have a shit defence and an imbalanced midfield(again Klopp takes blame for some of that) and there's at least 3 teams who are vastly better to the point that without ridiculously good investment i really don't see how any managers makes them break into the top 3. Manchester sides and Spurs are just flat out better.

Palace, West Ham and Swansea. Everton and Stoke will be shit all season but not shit enough to go down.

So what you are saying is it's actually 800m.