triggs

It's not at all. Tattoos are (most of the time at least) personal and have a meaning for whoever gets them. His tattoo has a deeper meaning for him due to his father, it's not up to anyone else to criticize his choice. Did he not just say it's cos he shoots with his right foot? His weapon of choice is his feet, rather than actual weapons - which is a path his life could have taken due to his upbringing. It's how I've understood the situation, at least Aye that makes sense. He can do what he wants like but I still think it's a bad idea

It's not at all. Tattoos are (most of the time at least) personal and have a meaning for whoever gets them. His tattoo has a deeper meaning for him due to his father, it's not up to anyone else to criticize his choice. Did he not just say it's cos he shoots with his right foot?

so fuck? he's a grown man, he can have whatever tattoo he likes, what has it got to do with anyone else but him? Does having a tattoo = I love guns? Alright calm down I just think getting a tattoo of a gun is a terrible idea. I actually don't mind Sterling though and have stood up for him for both on field and off field stuff when he was getting pelters on here in the past

Usually I'd be on Sterling's side and he has been treated disgracefully by the tabloids in the past but that's a really stupid tattoo

Big CL games he has

Thought he would have got somewhere better than back to Anderlecht

Aye, agree. Liverpool fans are embarrassing

Ronaldo did fuck all bar score a penalty since that bicycle

Depressing to think our stadium used to be a genuine contender to host European finals. Torkey !! Is that even in Europe ? For football yes, they could play it in Kazakhstan if they wanted

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-44220822 Needs more Mr Worldwide IMO

Get tapatalk

Surprised you'd get as much as 70k managing in the Scottish championship

Is that allowed? Yes. Didn't England score/concede from a corner in a qualifying game once?

Still listen to it fairly regularly

Is that Willy Caballero as first choice now?

Getting Malaga and Villareal to the latter stages of the CL while being very unlucky not to progress further is better than winning the Europa League IMO. Pellegrini also did better with City than Emery did with PSG and got a then record points total with Real Madrid

Hmmm ... Think you're being way too kind regarding Pardew. I'd argue he found a way to pick worse players int the team than he should have the majority of the time. And he found a way to select the wrong tactics also. He also managed to finish second in literally the easiest league to win Monaco got 95 points like

Don't think he'll be as bad as some here seem to think mind

Think Arsenal and West Ham may both have been better off if they switched coaches

Not sure about that like. He's phenomenally amazing, but he's not very midfielder-y. Unless you're Pardew. In which case he should play left-midfield/auxiliary second left-back Just meant he can help in the build up and create chances. Helps to have that if your midfield is lacking, but there's real scenario for the defence like that. Its a negative rather than a plus IMO, he has to come ridiculously deep and do everything by himself because none of their midfielders can get him the ball in good areas Usually I'd agree, depends on what's in front of him i would say. Would argue Dybala being there is a big help from that aspect as he can relieve some of the creative burden from Messi. Dybala won't be playing, they both play in the same space and Dybala was poor when tried out on the wing wanted to see them play together, would still try it tbh think it's the only way they can be successful. Well like, I say that but I guess with Sampaoli now having a bit of time to gel the team, it could potentially happen but on all previous evidence it won't

Not sure about that like. He's phenomenally amazing, but he's not very midfielder-y. Unless you're Pardew. In which case he should play left-midfield/auxiliary second left-back Just meant he can help in the build up and create chances. Helps to have that if your midfield is lacking, but there's real scenario for the defence like that. Its a negative rather than a plus IMO, he has to come ridiculously deep and do everything by himself because none of their midfielders can get him the ball in good areas Usually I'd agree, depends on what's in front of him i would say. Would argue Dybala being there is a big help from that aspect as he can relieve some of the creative burden from Messi. Dybala won't be playing, they both play in the same space and Dybala was poor when tried out on the wing

They do have an embarrassment of riches up front. I'd have gone for Icardi over Higuain, but Icardi is a bit crackers Aye, like people always go on about their great attackers and think they should be a better team but realistically you can only start Messi and one of Aguero/Higuain/Icardi at any one time, while the rest of the team has massive deficiencies

Not sure about that like. He's phenomenally amazing, but he's not very midfielder-y. Unless you're Pardew. In which case he should play left-midfield/auxiliary second left-back Just meant he can help in the build up and create chances. Helps to have that if your midfield is lacking, but there's real scenario for the defence like that. Its a negative rather than a plus IMO, he has to come ridiculously deep and do everything by himself because none of their midfielders can get him the ball in good areas

Nar, its cos he was shite the last time he played and they already have Aguero and Higuain

He only has 4 caps - mental Meh, he was shite last time he played and they already have Higuain and Aguero. Dybala is only in the squad in case Messi gets injured/suspended