r0cafella

The calculations are correct but it doesn't work in that way. If we went and spent 400m we would have to undergo massive sales later to balance the books.

This means nothing. 420m

I think your post is a fair one, reasonable and measured. I also don't believe our payers are dick heads what I do believe is we are no longer particular attractive and we've shown ourselves to he both poor negotiators and weak willed. I couldn't careless about Isak personally focusing on the individual other than calling him a cunt is reductive. For me this was about facing a test and standing on business and by my measure we failed it spectacularly.

And just so people are aware here. The annual cost of big Nick is more than what Isak was, basically the player is more expensive. If we buy Wissa for something daft like 50m his cost will also be more on an annual basis (we aren't giving him a 5 year deal) The same will be the case for Jsl. We are paying more for less essentially.

I'm referring to the players we've signed in this window, someone is giving them the nod.

Dippers.

Comments of cartel cucks if we are being honest.

Another question for the family? Do people really believe a professional player can't run for 90 minutes?

So, all these players we have bought who's responsible for them? It's kinda funny that Mitchell left but we never got clarity on how the decision making flow would be regarding transfers.

We will give your one of the best strikers in the world if we can replace him with two inferior players

That's actually a really important point. We are meant to be challengers if you will looking to challenge what is a cartel but we've just enabled them and strengthened them. It's absolutely mad.

It won't make that much of a difference imo. The issues we have are structural we will discuss it one day.

Even if he sat out who cares? I mean why is it even a factor in people's thinking? The moment he went on strike he was dead to me the priority became the principle and standing firm. We an institute got bullied by scousers and a fucking sulking Swede. How embarrassing.

On players with very limited upside As I love to say, I don't want to hear about PSR when we make things as hard as possible for ourselves.

It's all the more amusing because I was going back and forth with Heron who is a lovely lad before it broke about this

NGL I fell for that to play along isak line for a minute

They took what they thought was the easiest option. We know people like this they will be believing they've made a great deal and all is good. Short term pain. Come back stronger etc im sure we've all heard that. If not be prepared for him scoring 25 goals and the media telling us what amazing business we've done by getting such a fee for a player who wanted to leave. It's going to unbearable.

He held a water gun that's it. When it comes to points or principle your meant to stand on it. Anyone who has ever done that will understand this. For me, the club could have held on for 3 years took points deductions and released this cunt for free, they would have had my 100% backing and support.

We decided to go with it. Nobody held a gun to our head.

Oh yeah for sure. It's absolutely infuriating.

Guys they aren't serious owners it's ok to admit it now. It's clear that the pro league is priority number one and we are a bit of an after thought.

They aren't that interested. Btw did you buy the latest drop from Adidas? Now that's interesting.

Will they? Same fan base that argued with folks protesting Ashley?

Aren't you PIFs number one defender? No disrespect.

Of course but you seem to be getting me confused. I've got no issues with selling players. I advocate for it. If I was in charge we'd have got money for Pope and Wilson a year or two ago