Jump to content

r0cafella

Member
  • Posts

    22,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by r0cafella

  1. Absolutely aye, that’s his selling point but that’s it.
  2. Limited mid table fullback who won’t get better no ? Also violates my personal no signing man united rejects rule. Don’t think he will be bad but if he’s not motivated he could be a big financial burden for them.
  3. Even if they do sign fulkrug who is nothing special imo they will be average.
  4. It’s on the J league international channel so oddly it might only be available on that channel outside of Japan.
  5. And to add on, they have so many things they could be writing about and investigating but nah, weekly none update it is.
  6. Aye it’s Waugh with his weekly copy and paste job.
  7. Lads, rumours from Turkey are for entertainment purposes only.
  8. Even flogging them both in January wouldn’t have been enough to cover the shortfall.
  9. Of course it is, Chelsea couldn’t afford him this year so the loan helps them. Also gets them an extra year. Works out amazingly for them.
  10. Yup, Napoli are getting someone who is old and washed and giving up the best player they have on loan. Comedy deal only an Italian would do.
  11. I didn’t read a clear answer. From what she said she wanted to stay but couldn’t because she hired a management team to run the club? But YAR said he would be happy for her to stay as a paid Ceo? Maybe I misread
  12. Caulkin has a piece up about which is a semi interview with AS on the athletic.
  13. I see what you’re saying, I expect to see replacements if genuine squad players are sold, also we need to increase our pool of potential FFP flips so expecting a little more.
  14. We will spend between 80-100 net this season. Is that small?
  15. They likely wouldn’t, for a buy back to be a thing for Brighton (he’s brightons record signing) you’d imagine the fee would have to be a record for them too. So in excess of 100m.
  16. Yes, we would never trigger such a clause so it’s pointless.
  17. You aren’t selling players for 35m and getting buybacks. Why pay so much and sell your upside to a distressed seller, it’s a fantasy.
  18. r0cafella

    Malick Thiaw

    We think about long term value, not short term. Form is temporary class is permanent and all that.
  19. brother nobody wants to give us money for Ben Parkinson. The sellable assets we have at Academt level are either too young to have value to make a difference. ( Sanusi/Sahar ) or Miley whom we obviously shouldn’t be letting go. So that leaves us with the first team squad whom we don’t want (we’ve been trying to shift these guys for 2 years without many offers) or selling Anderson and Minteh. I think the pinch In future won’t be as bad as we have higher revenue and a better overall squad now than we did then.
  20. Aye far too easy to connect those dots to not do it. Literal win win for someone stealing a living like Bailey, we just need Bein Ben to hop on board as well as that other tosser who’s name I forget.
  21. It’s been obvious if FFP were to be imposed our FFP position was bad, the numbers have been clear for awhile. your speaking about player trading and it’s exactly what we’ve done with Minteh and Anderson, we’ve let two fringe players go for massive money and are clear now to keep our star players who nobody wants to lose. On this front we’ve been damn near perfect. I think questions should be asked why certain sponsorships have been done and what the actual goal is. Because as I’ve said many times I don’t see how we bridge the gap financially to enable consistent success.
  22. Cmon nobody batted an eyelid when we got Tonali, the price was totally fine. I’m also pretty sure most fans are perfectly happy having Tonali Bruno and big Joe in midfield, I don’t think we can better that midfield if we let Bruno go.
  23. If so then it cost nought so they would be laughing. im no AI expert so wouldn’t know.
×
×
  • Create New...