Jump to content

Beth

Member
  • Posts

    1,431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Beth

  1. Beth

    Harvey Barnes

    Looks like the entire front six is sorted for at least 2-3 seasons, unless we scout a relative bargain in the meantime.
  2. I'd imagine Ward-Prowse would be his replacement. Just shows the total lack of ambition by the WH owners though.
  3. Beth

    sunderland

    44 my fucking arse. More like 64.
  4. If WHU are offering £60m for Maguire and McTominay their owners are absolutely mental. Moyes loves signing has beens and never will be's.
  5. He's decent in a back three or five, too slow to be in a standard back four.
  6. Beth

    NUFC Transfer Rumours

    What a shit comeback. You should be ashamed of yourself.
  7. Beth

    NUFC Transfer Rumours

    I hope their footballing ability is better than their haircuts.
  8. £64m for a poundland Haaland, thanks but no thanks.
  9. Yes thats seems wrong, along with Wilson being on "only" £43k and Schar £40k a week, but most of the other wages quoted look about right. Edit: Sancho at Man U on £350k a week, christ if that's right no wonder they're struggling to afford a decent striker.
  10. On £210k a week according to Capology. Seems a bit high, thought it would be around £150-180k.
  11. Well you are an administrator, can you not add one to this site?
  12. He's a mediocre 32 year old Championship level keeper. Anyone who thought we were getting £5m or so for him are the same people who thought we got £15m for Chris Wood.
  13. Beth

    Tino Livramento

    Can he play left back as well?
  14. But he was mint against Man City last season man, and in one or two other games, that's all that matters. Consistency and availability for selection is an optional requirement for some on here.
  15. Probably the best penalty saves ratio to conceeded of any keeper we've ever had, shame the rest was a bit shit.
  16. In terms of ability no, but in terms of consistency and availability a massive upgrade.
  17. £20m difference for a more reliable, more consistent and less injury prone player? Seems fair enough to me like.
  18. My point being that 50 or 300, it's an overinflated fee. I'm sure if we were not owned by Saudis we would be asking for 50, but we're hobbled when it comes to selling to them due to the association we have already.
  19. So why don't they offer £300m then? Any deal we do with Saudi based teams will be under the microscope more than any other club.
  20. Too inconsistent and too injury prone to be worth anywhere near £50m.
  21. That I don't wear football tops with a players name printed on the back?
  22. Run along now, your mam has just told you that supper is ready.
×
×
  • Create New...