OpenC

Well, I wish he hadn't preferred Milan if you want to put it that way instead

exactly this. I mean, it's obviously great. I just wish he had wanted to come here

Not a 90s videogame fan then

Passion Pride Promotion Profitable Pamphlet

Might have watched how Roeder operated and still be running the rule over him

I came to football pretty late after ignoring it for decades, so my first team was the Bobby Robson team around 2002. I can't divide the two wingers I remember most from around that time, Solano and Robert.

Almost twice as fast as we thought

Also an important bit of data that he wasn't doing any of that stuff for relegation rivals Burnley any more; I reckon the deal was way more shithousery than is generally acknowledged but I'm not sure there's data on that

Fighting the good fight alone, a tragedy. Do they bother engaging with his frothing and wailing and gnashing of teeth on RTG?

Might just set up an account to append, 'nee likes, nee comments, nee retweets again then' to everything he posts

into the mackemverse to the mewn etc

They would be richer than us at ten in the morning then worth £0.0000008p by twenty past three that afternoon

Brazilia of the North again

Only disappointment for me is Man U, all good apart from that. I wasn't so arsed about a top ten finish

Exactly, it's not rocket science like

I feel like it hasn't been this good for about 20 years

bang on

That would be my preferred outcome

Fighting with the opposition fans and maintaining a dignified stance on Saudi atrocities?

No man, they're a classy club with classy fans. It'll be ok

Aye, basically that

I just can't get past the Solution In Search Of A Problem definition. It's perfect. I don't suppose I'll ever be able to see this as just a way to monetize absolutely fucking anything, even things that don't exist, and if folk are cool with that and want to spunk money away on literally absolutely nothing then fair enough one day people will realise that it's literally absolutely nothing and some folk will be holding the bag I might try to convince somebody that I'm in a position to sell the rights to the number 10, see if I can get somebody to buy it. Or the colour puce, maybe.

In fact, fuck it. It's just a woman repeating the points that some dude in a sweater is making, but the dude appears to be dead wrong and it's not clear why he should be considered an authority on the apparent equivalence of actual art and monkey JPGs I'm not trying be toxic like, but just because somebody says it's the same as paying big money for unique artwork don't make it so

'the actual drawing on the wall is not the artwork, the artwork is the certificate. Without the certificate the artwork has no value' I mean, this is just demonstrably not the case and the whole video seems predicated on the idea that because actual art can be really expensive, it's cool for NFTs to be as well I'm only halfway but I'm losing hope here

The video loses sceptical viewers at the very outset by saying that we need to understand why we value art so highly to understand this subject. It's not true - art is valued because it's aesthetically appealing, and one of a kind, and you don't need to watch the rest of the video to have already established that NFTs are neither of the above. I'll watch it but the very first point it makes appears to be tangentially related at very best