et tu brute

Bruno was signed in January, so what has that to do with the Summer budget?

Yeah I just watched it again and he did say it, doesn't change your theory on the budget being a load of shite though (it actually enforces this because they were looking to bring Pedro in anyway before Isak become available).

Changed slightly as in they didn't go for Pedro when Isak become available. Pedro was well in the works before Wilson got his injury. Isak had been on the list of top targets since January, but Sociadad did not want to sell. As I said you stick to your budget theory.

I watched his conference and he didn't say that at all. When asked the question he was keen to point out that Wilson's injury was not serious and that they both could play together. You stick to your budget though and let's see what happens.

Bollocks, he didn't say anything of the sort about Wilson's injury being the reason. If a player becomes available at the right price then the money will be made available.

You have kept mentioning budget all summer and that already has proven to be a load of shite.

Ekitike also and he wasn't a loan signing either.

Aye, Ekitike came out of the blue on deadline day in January and would have been signed in time if he had wanted to come.

I would certainly hope that we bring in a 'first team' option in midfield and not just a 'squad' option. Be a massive opportunity lost if we don't imho. I can see Isak playing on the right hand side of a three forward line, so I can see the full emphasis being on the midfield slot with the time left (be great if we did get both mind). I pay no attention to the journalists reports (I think some on here pay to much attention to be honest - look at Isak coming totally out of the blue) and Howe has been playing a straight bat all Summer with regards to transfers. Only two days to find out anyway.

Totally disagree, you don't let other clubs take the piss out of you like they did in January. If they can afford to pay 150 million plus on two players, then they can afford to pay up on Dubravka. You have your view and this is mine we're not going to agree.

Nope next question

I can after January and the way they tried to fuck us over. No way on hell they should be given an option, either commit or fuck off.

Mind, it was obvious he was carrying an injury at the end of that Tranmere game. Just seemed an unnecessary risk bringing him on at that stage with us leading.

It was obvious when we bid for Maddison that Paqueta wasn't in the clubs plans. I think by Thursday we will have a couple of quality players in, so not long to wait (hopefully).

It's absolutely shit by us after January. Giving totally the wrong message, they can try and fuck us with a red hot iron up the arse when we wanted one of their players, yet we go on our back for a tummy tickle when they want one of ours. Load of shit.

Aye midweek matches so that will be the reason

I'd make sure we can get every penny off them after January. They're splashing the cash left, right and centre and if they want an international and proven PL keeper, then they need to pay up. I also wouldn't have Darlow as first choice backup keeper.

We will have to pay money for any replacement, so if they want him, then they need to pay up

I can't after what Man U did in January, in fact I'd be absolutely amazed if they even considered it

That's not even a guaranteed fee either, tell them to fuck right off with that offer.

Biggest hypocrite going he is

We also had the Willock chance, that save from Maxi just after the goal and Botman mistiming his jump when contact was a certain goal. This without Bruno, Wilson or Isak

We don't need a back up we have Longstaff, Shelvey and Willock as options for that. We need someone to take us to the next level and McTominay is certainly not that

Got to, I've been banging on the whole transfer window that a new midfielder was a must. Thankfully I'm pretty sure we will have one in by Thursday.

He's nowhere near PL standard.