Jump to content

et tu brute

Member
  • Posts

    6,047
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by et tu brute

  1. They do if you compare the full history of the clubs. If you take it only from when Tottenham were formed that's not the case. We have a higher average.
  2. I guarantee you now that we will not only be ok FFP wise, but there will be signings coming in this summer. The owners will ensure that sponsorship is spread out to keep revenue income increasing year on year. I also think none of out top players will be sold this summer (unless Madrid or Barcelona meet Bruno's buy out clause) or a stupid fee comes in from other clubs. More likely to see the sale of the likes of Longstaff, Wilson and Murphy added to some of the dead wood we have.
  3. The revenue will increase though due to champions league money and the sela sponsorship.
  4. Football clubs are now a business first, like it or not. As such, they should be allowed to run as a business and owners should not be restricted to invest into THEIR own business as they see fit to do so. The current rules are both a restraint of trade and anti-competitive. The noise is getting bigger and I honestly believe it's only a matter of time before it's blown open by a legal challenge.
  5. Watching the Newcastle Fans TV there was a big turnout from our fans. They recorded even the Man Utd girls and coaches coming over and clapping our fans. Good stuff
  6. This year's accounts which haven't been published. You're not counting future sponsorship also which I'm sure will be forthcoming or the new fan zone. Let's just wait for the accounts to be published for the next two years.
  7. Seka deal they reckon is over 20 million (possibly 25 million), the champions league money will be included in next years accounts. A 50 million increase is still quite significant for next year. The club will be adding other sponsorship within the next few years also. Again don't agree with what you're saying.
  8. We will have the champions league money and the sela sponsorship as well as a few other sponsorships recently announced. Year after we will have the adidas deal and the fan zone coming into play, so the revenue increases will again be still quite significant the next two years.
  9. We've got billions in the owners, but can't invest hardly any of that money due to the FFP restrictions. Only football can see an owner own their club and then not invest into that business. That is the main block not the 105 million threshold over three years. I honestly believe it's only a matter of time before it's challenged by some owner(s), as it's a restriction of trade and anti-competitive.
  10. I've never been impressed by our keeper when I've seen her. Mind goalkeeping is not a bright spot in women's football full stop
  11. Obviously a big step up in quality, but I'm surprised by the hoof ball to the isolated striker. Always seemed to be a passing team when I've watched them, been a bit surprised to be honest at the tactics here.
  12. You should stick to your own suggestions, and who the fuck says bruv
  13. Which is exactly the reason I stated it. Do you think I would play Schar there if everyone was fit?
  14. Especially for a player who has only been on the pitch for 16 games in a year and a half (mostly as a sub).
  15. It's not just the world champions though that is the point.
  16. Let's just play through our midfield at will then as has happened every time the current midfielders have played. Not rocket science it's quite obvious the three players cannot stop the ball being played through them at will. It might not have worked, but I put money on it couldn't have been any worse.
  17. It's the one thing I would have changed, taken Longstaff off (or either him or Miley not starting) and put Schar at number 6. Might not have worked, but I said the other day that they would play through our midfield easily and that's what exactly happened. Joelington missing was (and is) massive.
  18. I said it at half time that they were playing through our midfield, I honestly believe we be would have been better putting Lascelles on and Schar as the defensive midfielder. De Bruyne changed the game. The owners have to make a decision with injuries being nowhere near. We looked totally off our feet second half.
  19. It's exactly as I thought it would be playing through our midfield at will. I'd honestly be tempted to bring Lascelles on and put Shar in the number 6 position. Not ideal I know but can't keep going like this
  20. Not got a problem with the 105 million loss threshold, the problem is that the owners are limited in how much they can invest into their own business. This is absolutely farcical, doesn't happen in any other business and is a clear restraint of trade.
  21. The wages would be everyone I would imagine
  22. I see they're still telling there lies about us not selling out at Everton. Why do they come out with their imaginary tales, which later on becomes fact to them and something they will try to use. Can someone who has an account on there put them right. https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/newcastle-fan-advisory-board.1624738/post-39883975
×
×
  • Create New...