et tu brute

I'm pissed off with that mind, the lack of quality in the final third this season has been woeful, even when we have had Isak available. How the fuck Murphy and Almiron are still the first choice right wingers is unreal.

The fucking bias from Carragher is fucking disgraceful

Cabbage patch doll on she is an absolute joke

Even the first goal had a huge element of luck about it

I think the capacity now is 46,000 for some reason, maybe segregation now they have moved the away fans

Big three games coming up, here I think we will have a better indication on whether the team can actually challenge. Durham home, Sunderland away, then Charlton home will give us a canny idea of where we stand.

Fair

Howe has certainly changed his tune a lot on the stadium. Me thinks he has inside information.

Yeah I know what the Webster ruling was. This is totally different though as it's a rule brought in to stop two clubs in particular and are totally against competition rulings and are a restraint of trade against a business. We will see what happens as that is the only way. I can't see anything else but a Man City win, which was touched on by the Premier League's mouthpiece in the media and pulled from the table at very late notice at the last meeting.

Time will tell mate

You're just being stupid (which I know you're not) or huffy now as the changes have not been put in place (if any are). You're making assumptions because nothing has been announced. It won't be as the agenda item to discuss this was taken off the table. We will know soon enough one way or another

And? One ruling doesn't constitute anything and that's why Man City have challenged the current rules.

Not when it's business related there are not

Your last four words are essential. There has to be a challenge first and there has been, so it has to apply to the legalities within British Law

It is doesn't constitute what is within British Law, then it certainly is enforceable (got fuck all to do with it being a football matter). Ziegler (Premier League mouthpiece) indicated that the verdict was quite substantial in favour of Man City). It's not a case of there would be leaks if Man City had won, as there are no leaks either that the Premier League had won. There is no news because the item covering this was pulled at the last meeting. IMO the item would not have been pulled if there was only a minor change or nothing changing. Time will tell though

Just can't see it with the cost, limitations and the fact that a mass amount of season ticket holders will be affected, resulting in a decent loss of revenue when we are already up against it with PSR rules. Also I take no notice of what that bald cunt reports

I wouldn't sign up to say one word to those inbred fuckers. I would be banned first post

Almiron every time turning back onto his left foot and longstaff just being longstaff.

Just one thing a new stadium would bring decent revenue in, is the top music artists coming to Newcastle. Something that SJP is restricted on with entry/exit into the stadium, for artists who have big stage sets.

That's the excuse they will use, not financially sound and they will be 100% correct to use that

Only sold 2,000'accorsing to the inbreds

Onviously they couldn't due to capacity, but your point more than stands up,, when there will be nearly 20,000 (actual not their shite official figure) less fans in their stadium

Daft twat doesn't even read the post made two posts before his. Thick as fuck man. They will be making every excuse going as the fewm boils over

Tomorrow night will show this exactly, third in the league and they will be lucky to have 30,000 there (obviously the official attendance will be the usual lies. Whereas, just down the road there will be a sell out for a League 2 side (not wanting to be disrespectful to Wimbledon). Attendance threads every home game, despite the proven bullshit for their official attendances. Cheap season tickets and tickets given away; as their accounts fully demonstrate with mid table revenue levels for the Championship.