KingArthur

We didnt score against 10 men v Liverpool, but conceded twice…

How on earth Yates has not good a booking?

Their squad is nowhere near big enough for UCL extra games.

He cannot give the red after the goal

Should have passed, but it was a foul and VAR would have taken it away anyway

Wasnt our worst performance at Stamford Bridge that I have seen. If you compare the money spent in the last 2-3 years, you couldn't see the difference being that big. I think we win at home.

Yea I mean changing the core of the team. We need a long term solution for GK, starting big money CB, at least 1 striker and big money RW.

Livramento is good going forward, but his passing is a way behind what we get from Trippier. But young and hopefully that will improve. Lots of time

Mitchell has a lot to do in the next 2-3 years.

I think he is a dead man walking

Really has not evolved. He said managers have to evolve to stay alive, but we have played pretty much the same system for 2,5 years now. Of course our squad is awful also, no depth whatsoever.

Wtf is that Isak Certainly a foul though

Our away form is awful and this formation does not work without intensity. We have huge caps everywhere, no support for Isak and wingers isolated. Top 10 would be good result with this football. And no one to bring from the bench that changes

That doesn't mean you have to foul him. Just stay tight. 2-1. Too easy from the near post.

Schär is way too soft when he follows Jackson to midfield. You cannot let the striker turn so easily. Happens every single time.

There are different ways still. Chelsea have spent like 500 million in their midfield, wingers and strikers, and still there was no movement, no combinations, no urgency. Just players standing still recycling the ball like in a handball game. Totally different to Man City, for example, who forces opponent very close to their own box. Of course Liverpool is a lot better than Wolves, but still lack of movement was very evident yesterday,

Chelsea’s attacking against low block is horrible.

If he stands still that is not a foul. He takes 1 step back so that could be given as a foul, but usually in games a lot worse blocks don't get looked twice.

He does not obstruct the keeper when he the offside could happen. When Stones heads the ball, he is far away. If offside is given like that you wish for, then the City player giving the corner was in offside also.. And usually teams just put a defender in front of the keeper so that blocking doesn't happen. When the corner is taken, he is not offside, so only a foul on keeper could be given. Is that really a foul? Sa is not protesting at all... They were checking if he was in line of sight of the keeper. That is why the goal was not given first.

It certainly was not offside. Maybe a foul on Sa, but even that would have been ridiculously cheap foul to give. He cannot be in an offside position before ball hits Stones' head. And when it does he is 5 feet away and dodging.

Yes they have, but those are still a one way to score.

We didnt take our chances, and I am bit worried that too much rests on Gordon and Isak. Midfielders are not really scoring, although Joelinton could and perhaps should, and without Trippier his set piece threat and crosses are missing. Isak is very isolated and I really can't see us scoring very much.

We have again created enough chances to win.

8 times in a row!

Well, we missed a penalty, Gordon missed a breakaway and Bruno's shot was cleared from the goal line. We should have score 1-2 easily with those chances. With Isak I think we win that game. But we definitely need some creativity from the right.