Matt1892

I don’t think it is that straightforward, as we would be in a position where we would need to raise about £70 million on sales before July.

Chelsea called it off because Delap is injured.

About £30 million? Adding the fees for Longstaff and Kelly to the £130 million.

The article is Luke shifting his positions to cover himself if Isak does go, since he has been so confident that PIF would refuse all bids under £150 million.

If he is sold without another striker coming in, then that would be a shocking decision by the club.

It doesn’t shut it SLAMS SHUT.

Liverpool ready to drop the take it or leave it.

Pointless comparing him to Isak when he will be Wilson’s replacement.

More likely Barnes being moved on I would guess.

I can’t see us signing 2 strikers with no Premier League experience, unless we have no other options available.

Which one player would this be? Presuming he isn’t talking about a striker if Isak is still here.

I’ve got no issue with Isak going for less than the mythical asking price, he has engineered a position within the club where his future here looks untenable. We need to move on from him and fans need to find peace with the club and the position they have taken when he is sold. He shouldn’t be sold without a replacement coming in though.

We are only 2 points down on last season against the same opposition, so plenty of time to get this right. Champions League has to be the aim again, but we need the window to shut tomorrow so we can see what we have to work with.

Leeds sat deep but we couldn’t control the midfield to put pressure on them. I don’t think either team would have scored if the game went on until midnight.

He’s look alright with his hold up play when dropping with his back to goal, we just look disjointed across the frontline with Murphy and Tino wide and no threat from midfield.

Leeds team looks terrible.

The benefit for PIF turning down an offer for Isak late in the window is that he might end up in Saudi until January.

Sign Strand Larsen and keep Isak until January as third choice.

Spurs with 0 xG at half time.

I would be surprised if Strand Larsen has a quicker top speed than Isak, he is a unit when he gets going though.

Another striker if Isak goes and that will be it I think, anything else would be an unexpected bonus.

Could we not swap Lopez and Torres for Isak? Obviously in separate deals for FFP but would be an ideal ending to the window.

I don’t think it is common, it just so happened with our striker and another we wanted to being in.

Woltemade and Strand Larsen have completely different attributes, and if we wanted to play with two up top then we would play Woltemade off Strand Larsen. If we are playing with two strikers on the pitch, it will be because we are struggling to break a team down so we are either behind or they have parked the bus, pace wont help us in that situation. Not to mention Wissa has a poor attitude and is at an age where there isn’t much room for development.