Matt1892

I can see Arsenal going for Jackson.

I’m not sure Sesko, Ekitike or Samu are any less of a risk than Strand Larsen.

I think the club has said that he can go if we get a suitable offer and can sign a replacement, neither has happened but Isak likely thinks the offer from Liverpool is suitable and that the club isn’t putting enough effort in to signing a replacement, which is why he is playing up and trying to make his future here untenable. Isak is clearly in the wrong and is trying to manipulate the narrative to suit his agenda, which they have been doing for weeks.

If we get both I can see Isak going to Saudi after our transfer window closes, signing with a buy out clause included before moving again next summer.

I can see Wolves selling if the offer is right. People say about them being relegated if they sell their best player, but there is a good chance that they get relegated if he stays, as they only picked up 42 points last season with Cunha and Ait-Nouri. At least if they do sell him they can roll the dice on a couple of transfer, maybe bringing in 3 or 4 to strengthen across the side, which might be more appealing to them if they are gambling on staying up.

Shame about the date as that would be good odds of for him being at a Saudi club by mid September.

The window isn’t closed yet.

Shearergol is definitely up there, he never recovered after he made up about climbing on Sheridan Smith, the bullshitter.😂

You can like the post in the bottom right corner.

There was an article a few weeks back saying Wolves would want £65 million to let him go.

This is a really good point, it wouldn’t just be about money but him having the ability to jump ship without us having to accept an offer, getting him out of the position his agent put him in by not asking for a release clause in the first place.

No, we can reject his request if we want. It just means that he won’t be entitled to any loyalty payments that are usually paid when someone moves and gets possibly a percentage of fee.

Offer him and his agent a meeting to discuss a proposed end to the issue, at the Saudi Embassy in London.

The statement will say they are disappointed at his comments, point out that he is under contract for 3 more years and that no bid has been received that meets the clubs valuation (or that there has but he turned the move down). Then end by saying that the manager sees Alex as an integral part of the squad.

BBC Sport understands Isak believed he would be allowed to leave Newcastle if a big club came in for him and offered the right price.

The club could come out and say that, how he was told that there would be talks for a new contract but they had to be postponed due to PSR, something that stops ambitious clubs from rewarding their better players and stopped us competing for the best players in terms of transfer fees and wages. Use it as a stick to bash PSR now there is so much attention on the club.

I agree with Edwards, the club will release a statement in response to this.

Sign 2 strikers and make him stay until the transfer window closes, he can then warm the bench or move to Saudi on loan.

It is worded in a way that shows he is ramping up the pressure on us to let him leave, but also allows for him to come back, with the wording of where things are for me right now. Interesting few weeks coming up.

That’s the main reason I wouldn’t want him.

Is he saying Eddie is lying? Unless he is saying someone else is?

Would rather pay the extra for Strand Larsen if we can afford it.

Yes, I would say so.

Mason Greenwood?