Jump to content

Chris L

Member
  • Posts

    611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chris L

  1. Thought it was well known the third would be using the adidas equipment type colour/logo?
  2. how did none of the "ITK" accounts not know anything about this one.......
  3. pretty sure i have seen videos of him speaking english? just clearly isnt confident enough to do it on interviews etc. others have been like that before in the past too
  4. Chris L

    sunderland

    Sensible decision by rigg. If he joined a prem side. He’d either be in the reserves or loaned out anywhere and everywhere for a couple of years. At Sunderland he will get first team football probably quite often. wonder if any club approached him with /Sunderland and had the offer of staying at Sunderland on loan next season. But chose to stay there as their player instead.
  5. we arent. the stuff on twitter comes from a "polls" account who made a joke and a man u account took it as gospel.
  6. this whole PSR comment. if they are using that line already, does it not mean its a boost to the new financial year/years, rather than scraping it through the last one? like say we got 15m for him, thats 15m better off on this round already? or am i still completely lost with this whole thing?
  7. twitter ITK's (i know) reckon a fee has been agreed for wilson. if true, reckon it will wait until start of july to boost the funds on the new financial cycle? cant see it been done today imo
  8. Wasn’t the issue more a case of not being able to promise him the number 1 spot/ more game time than pope?
  9. what else would you have done differently financially? they had to bring in quality players, who cost more.. to gain ground on teams around us at the time. If they brought in lesser/cheaper players and not progressed. People would have been fuming at that instead. there are players here who have been here a while who they can’t sell as no one wants to buy. So not a huge amount of opportunities to bring money back in. it was obvious when he signed that players like minteh were potentially brought in with this sell on for higher amount idea in mind. Which has happened. Koul was another but that doesn’t seem to be working. this next 3 year cycle should be much better. They inherited a club that has had next to no revenue generated for a decade. They’ve built this up already.
  10. Likely all that was needed to hit that target so just accepted it to get it out the way.
  11. this will have been answered/explained before so apologies. But today has had my head battered. Am I right thinking once July 1st hits. We have a complete new cycle on the whole PSR stuff, with the new finances coming in to play, adidas/champions league etc? If so. We can then pretty much go all out with incomings? (Within reason obviously)
  12. Chris L

    Alexander Isak

    “Chelsea 'withdraw from race for Alexander Isak' after refusing to meet Newcastle's £100m-plus valuation and failed deal could have negative consequences for Everton” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13581945/Chelsea-withdraw-race-Alexander-Isak-refusing-meet-Newcastle-100m-plus-valuation-Everton.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=social-twitter_dailymailsport
  13. Chris L

    sunderland

    That’s the home GK kit
  14. thread title is nearly as bad as those crap headlines fake journalist twitter accounts make just so you click the link to their website.
  15. Pretty much (if not all) teams with adidas have the same keeper top template
  16. he just loves ruining peoples fun doesn't he haha.
  17. Chris L

    James Trafford

    same with any deal between companies. a price is sent, usually lower at first to try get a "good deal" on the buyers side. the selling side then review it and discuss it internally, either say yeah thats fine, or think, no we want more, so go back and say that. or they go back and say we want X amount. the buying club then take that onboard, then return with a new offer. if both have different values in mind, its not as simple as it looks. buying club have budgets for everything so need to work out if the extra causes issues elsewhere etc
  18. wonder if it was “leaked” or “put out there” in a tone of a dig at the premier league and its whole forcing clubs to sell players they don’t want to sell due to ffp. Similar to what Villa have had to do and acted on today. Like no intention of selling but a kick at the league sort of thing. If that makes sense
  19. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Match_(TV_series) This what you meant? I vaguely remember it after reading that
  20. Nah don’t think so. Can only remember old Trafford. wembley. stamford bridge London stadium etihad could be wrong though
  21. So they can claim the gate money. Bar money. Sponsorship money and put it towards their FFP
×
×
  • Create New...