Guest Ridzuan Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 the whole Luque situation just about sums him up the cheeky **** comes out saying all the right stuff but behind the scenes he must be a useless vindictive **** how can we have a 10M spanish international not having a game - ever - period the Guy is a fecking cint I agree.Luque must be laughing right now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 The fans, even those who wanted Roeder, have no guilt because of the state of our club, the fans don't appoint the managers even though we did our best to put pressure on the fat man, he is the only one to blame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 ...while some of us (like me for instance) thought it an act of utter lunacy. Happy with your daft self-destructive choice, boys ? :roll: Ah, once again you're here to stroke your ego. CONGRATULATIONS. Well done, some of us had faith, you didn't, you deserve a medal. Aye and whilst the ever-optimistic melanchronic made all the right noises about being happy with Roeder, its people like you that Shepherd listened to when he said "the fans wanted Roeder". If there was more people like Phil K about, and voiced their concerns, maybe the small-time appointments wouldn't be made in the first place. Go back and read my post Thompers. Once again I said I understood him being given a chance while never really being happy that this chance meant that far better options such as Hitzeld etc were ignored. Now I see he's taken his chance and quite simply, has proved himself to not be up to the standard we deserve. He's had his chance and it's not worked out. Well those who had faith are being proved wrong pal. Look at the table!!! I'm not sure that faith was the right word. But yes, I've nothing against those who thought he deserved a chance to prove last season wasn't just a 'honeymoon period'. Now we've come to realise it very much was. That's strange because when I told you it was merely a honeymoon period during the honeymoon period, you SLAUGHTERED me. FACT! Wow, you have some memory. Care to retrieve this "FACT!"? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 the whole Luque situation just about sums him up the cheeky cunt comes out saying all the right stuff but behind the scenes he must be a useless vindictive twat how can we have a 10M spanish international not having a game - ever - period the Guy is a fecking cint because Luque has always been a model pro plugging away for his chance you know nothing of what goes on in training, who are you to say he deserves a game? some people quickly forget shite performances tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 ...while some of us (like me for instance) thought it an act of utter lunacy. Happy with your daft self-destructive choice, boys ? :roll: find me one source that backs up your idiotic claims and I might respond What do you want him to back up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 ...while some of us (like me for instance) thought it an act of utter lunacy. Happy with your daft self-destructive choice, boys ? :roll: Ah, once again you're here to stroke your ego. CONGRATULATIONS. Well done, some of us had faith, you didn't, you deserve a medal. Aye and whilst the ever-optimistic melanchronic made all the right noises about being happy with Roeder, its people like you that Shepherd listened to when he said "the fans wanted Roeder". If there was more people like Phil K about, and voiced their concerns, maybe the small-time appointments wouldn't be made in the first place. Go back and read my post Thompers. Once again I said I understood him being given a chance while never really being happy that this chance meant that far better options such as Hitzeld etc were ignored. Now I see he's taken his chance and quite simply, has proved himself to not be up to the standard we deserve. He's had his chance and it's not worked out. Well those who had faith are being proved wrong pal. Look at the table!!! I'm not sure that faith was the right word. But yes, I've nothing against those who thought he deserved a chance to prove last season wasn't just a 'honeymoon period'. Now we've come to realise it very much was. That's strange because when I told you it was merely a honeymoon period during the honeymoon period, you SLAUGHTERED me. FACT! Wow, you have some memory. Care to retrieve this "FACT!"? No can't be arsed. But I know you did and so do you. So you think that our managers position is worthy of giving somebody a "chance". Risky, bit of a daredevil are we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest redmayne Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 dont blame the fans for his appointment at all the chairman is PAID for this job - and he keeps underperforming massive change is needed throughout the club but a new manager is priority - the players look dejected - never mind the fans and again Luque.... were a joke Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 ...while some of us (like me for instance) thought it an act of utter lunacy. Happy with your daft self-destructive choice, boys ? :roll: find me one source that backs up your idiotic claims and I might respond What do you want him to back up? 3 in 4, yes 3 in 4 NUFC fans were behind Roeders appointment? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 dont blame the fans for his appointment at all the chairman is PAID for this job - and he keeps underperforming massive change is needed throughout the club but a new manager is priority - the players look dejected - never mind the fans and again Luque.... were a joke Whereas I do partially blame the fans and their mentality. If Roeder was appointed at Liverpool in the same scenario that Roeder was appointed here, there would have been fucking outrage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 The fans, even those who wanted Roeder, have no guilt because of the state of our club, the fans don't appoint the managers even though we did our best to put pressure on the fat man, he is the only one to blame. Exactly. Just because a few people wanted him in does not automatically mean the chairman <b>had</b> to appoint him as permanent manager. He should have gone for proven quality, a manager capable of winning us trophies, instead of someone who did alright for us after one of our worst spells in history. So what if it might have upset a few fans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest redmayne Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 dont blame the fans for his appointment at all the chairman is PAID for this job - and he keeps underperforming massive change is needed throughout the club but a new manager is priority - the players look dejected - never mind the fans and again Luque.... were a joke Whereas I do partially blame the fans and their mentality. If Roeder was appointed at Liverpool in the same scenario that Roeder was appointment, there would have been ****ing outrage. good point...... how we can keep being told were a huge club and yet appoint roeder to run it is beyond me wonder what his excuse will be this time small squad by any chance? how about team selection you thick c*nt of a manager Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Jerusalem Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 When he was signed on a permanent basis I was worried about his ability in the transfer market - and when he signed a left winger (already got one of those) and a sprinter who looks unlikely to be able to find his arse with either hand as a replacement for one of the most clinical strikers in Premier League history, as well as completely failing to get in any sort of cover for our weakest position (defence Glenn!!!! - everybody in the football world has known about this for years how didn't he?) then the claxons and red flashing lights were really starting to go off. The fact that we have been, at best, complete dogshit all season, does not bode well for the transfer window. Who would actually want to come here now? Still, we might get a few million from the buzzards who come and pick at our relegated carcass next summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 I wanted O'Neill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest redmayne Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 When he was signed on a permanent basis I was worried about his ability in the transfer market - and when he signed a left winger (already got one of those) and a sprinter who looks unlikely to be able to find his arse with either hand as a replacement for one of the most clinical strikers in Premier League history, as well as completely failing to get in any sort of cover for our weakest position (defence Glenn!!!! - everybody in the football world has known about this for years how didn't he?) then the claxons and red flashing lights were really starting to go off. The fact that we have been, at best, complete dogshit all season, does not bode well for the transfer window. Who would actually want to come here now? Still, we might get a few million from the buzzards who come and pick at our relegated carcass next summer. absolutley agree 10 years ago it looked like we would go on and be the dominant force in the leauge now we are so far behind its unbelieveable - only bad management could do this for fooks sake how can we get it wrong so often? we could fall into a bucket of ti$ts and come up sucking a thumb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Actually,I think Freddy knows that Roeder is not as capable as he wish he was.And therefore,he only offered him a 2 year deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 I wanted O'Neill Me too. Medals all around! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 To be fair to the fans, we can say what we like about who we wanted to be manager, but it's always up to the chairman to make what he believes is the right appointment regardless of popular opinion. That's why he's on millions a year - the fact that the fans wanted GR is beside the point. FS is incapable of making these crunch decisions, except to pacify the public in the short term and thus maintain his own position. Therefore he's got to go ASAP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Hey Geyjon - thanks for giving me a laff with your "not a cockney or a hom" sig God allmighty - we need a laff when our team is such shit at the minute, thanks to the Duncenamic Duo of Shepherd and Roeder.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thompers Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Actually,I think Freddy knows that Roeder is not as capable as he wish he was.And therefore,he only offered him a 2 year deal. Nah he's too stupid to see the obvious (that it was gonna be a shit appointment). I think the 2 year deal was more down to the Souness pay-out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 I wanted O'Neill Me too. Medals all around! Actually, O'Neill said he was hanging on and on waiting for "a certain northern club to approach me, and they never did" I wonder....yet another stick to beat the fat tw@t with ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 again Phil K where is your evidence for the 3 in 4? and now, care to quote that littel gem about O'Neil too? Or are you full of shit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 3 in 4, yes 3 in 4 NUFC fans were behind Roeders appointment? They may have been by the time he was appointed, a lot were wanting him as manager by then. At the beginning I doubt more than 1 in a thousand wanted him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 I wanted O'Neill Me too. Medals all around! Actually, O'Neill said he was hanging on and on waiting for "a certain northern club to approach me, and they never did" I wonder....yet another stick to beat the fat tw@t with ? Where did he say that? If he did Shepherd needs some mental help. Not that he doesn't already... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Saying 75% wanted Roeder as manager is just a lie, it was 20% at the most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlufPurdi Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Saying 75% wanted Roeder as manager is just a lie, it was 20% at the most. I agree with this. That 20% made some ridiculous arguments mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now