ads Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 :lol: What a tool. http://www.comeonspurs.com/columns/10110406.php Typical Spurs fan. Deluded cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarrovianmag Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3331342/Spurs-in-shock-Andy-Carroll-swoop.html SPURS have made an enquiry for Newcastle striker Andy Carroll. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy contacted Toon officials to ask about the £30million-rated star's availability. Levy was told Carroll was not for sale but that has not put Spurs off and sources say they are ready to test Newcastle with a concrete offer. Tottenham are looking to bid £20m but it is understood Toon will demand at least £30m. Manchester City and Chelsea are also eyeing the striker, who has 11 goals this season. Carroll is out for three weeks with a torn thigh muscle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GeordieBatistuta Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 As one person put it: "I would rather dish out free blow jobs to the homeless than sell Andy Carroll" Brilliant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 'Spurs in shock Carroll swoop' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 'Spurs in shock Carroll swoop' so is the smiley for cos it's no shock or it's "speculative" ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Obviously. After all 'Mike Ashley is a 'selling' chairman' so says that Spurghs article... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Obviously. After all 'Mike Ashley is a 'selling' chairman' so says that Spurghs article... Who cares about the Spurs article? I feel he'd sell any player to get him off the wage bill and to make a profit. Therefore it's fact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 I feel hes yet to get rid of anyone that didn't need/want to go, therefore its fiction My opinion >Your opinion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 That's what I was thinking, especially with him missing the cup game. Calm down. He was never playing in the cup anyway ffs Because Ashley planned to sell him all along. Obviously. After all 'Mike Ashley is a 'selling' chairman' so says that Spurghs article... Who cares about the Spurs article? I feel he'd sell any player to get him off the wage bill and to make a profit. Therefore it's fact. whereas i don't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 But it's Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 Surely even he realises that while Carroll's on side and happy it's probably more cost effective to keep him, especially as he won't be on a sky high contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 But it's Ashley. He's going to take the cash. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 As one person put it: "I would rather dish out free blow jobs to the homeless than sell Andy Carroll" Brilliant. And as another put it: Can\'t see it happening. Carroll doesnt want to leave yet, and to be fair, like most English players, is pretty over rated. He\'s no better than Kenwyn Jones imo, just probaly got a bit more fight in him. We don\'t need a CL striker as we have Super Crouch, who turns into one of the most un playable striker in the world when playing in Europe and for England. Saurez is a player I like, Benzema is more of a VdV player than lone striker, Fabiano is to old and I think Lloriente will go Madrid so I\'d be very happy with Saurez! :mackems: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 The bit in bold isn't the most idiotic part of the post IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 The bit in bold isn't the most idiotic part of the post IMO. Super Crouch, who turns into one of the most un playable striker in the world? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 But it's Ashley. He's going to take the cash. You got any proof of that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 I just feel it. It's Ashley. Money grubbing bastard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 The bit in bold isn't the most idiotic part of the post IMO. You're actually not far wrong to be honest. That's the bit that tickled me the most though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 I just feel it. It's Ashley. Money grubbing b******. in truth though it 's "money throwing cunt" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 But it's Ashley. He's going to take the cash. This line of thinking is so misguided and frankly quite annoying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 I need to stop starting this argument when I'm bored or people will think I'm genuinely on that side. Would've thought 'I feel he'd sell any player to get him off the wage bill and to make a profit. Therefore it's fact.' would've been a dead giveaway I was taking the piss tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 BACKTRACKING Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lebowski Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 Frankly I have to say I'm deeply concerned, the only thing that makes any sense to me in getting rid of Hughton and bringing in the underwhelming Pardew is that Ashley wanted a yes man. I thought from the moment Pardew was in that Carroll and possibly others were going, when Carroll failed a 'late fitness' test and then went to London for an MRI scan (that you can get anywhere no scan is better than another) I feared the worse. The fact that they thought of playing him against Wigan and then advise he is out for at least 3 weeks is odd in itself, the NUFC medical staff should be good enough to know the likely seriousness of any injuries. Sadly I can see this happening, I really hope I'm wrong, I think in many ways Carroll is irreplaceable for us and I just don't think the purported deal would justify things, certainly not in the January window. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts