Kaizero Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 You know the Norwegian league games is very interesting considering that is our best ref. Have you out lawed penalties over there? Seems it, since just 30 minutes ago Rosenborg should've had an obvious penalty which would've won me £70. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ovesbar Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 You know the Norwegian league games is very interesting considering that is our best ref. Have you out lawed penalties over there? Seems it, since just 30 minutes ago Rosenborg should've had an obvious penalty which would've won me £70. The penalty decisions are completely random over here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Ha ha ha ha http://i43.tinypic.com/14ui442.jpg Ha ha ha ha. Only four English clubs to have won the big prize, and that way it shall stay. Back. Of. The. Fucking. Net. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 LOVE Drogba's reaction, diving prick doesn't deserve to play football again the way he play acts. Should join the Royal Shakespeare Company ffs. Terrible refereeing, really awful, but so glad Barca went through, they deserve it umpteen times more than Chelsea. Cheered so loudly when Iniesta's goal went in that I scared the shit out of the cat, who is currently hiding on the windowsill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I love how Hiddink lets him have his say then suddenly realises it's probably not the best idea in the world. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 http://www.vg.no/include/drfront/images/front-25-image-562923.jpeg?b19b01db194e7caaa89e1c9139401119 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ovesbar Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 http://www.vg.no/include/drfront/images/front-25-image-562923.jpeg?b19b01db194e7caaa89e1c9139401119 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Dont agree with this result for football nonsense. Impressive passing football only has any worth if its effective against the opposition. If the opposition sets out a plan to deal with it & it doesnt work, thats just how it is. The players could juggle the ball as they run around the pitch, that would be impressive to. They could only go for sliding tackles endlessly, regardless of whether it was a good moment or not. Again it would make it more entertaining. The problem is, neither tactic would be very effective. Barcelonas passing game doesnt mean anything if they find a side they cant use it against. A result for football tonight would have been chelsea getting a pen, barcelona staying on 11 men & seeing how the game turned out that way. Nothing else. Apparently defending doesn't count anymore. It's like a dirty word now. If you go all out attack and neglect the defence then that's true football but if you set up defensively at the expense of the attack then that is totally wrong and evil and must be stopped. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Dont agree with this result for football nonsense. Impressive passing football only has any worth if its effective against the opposition. If the opposition sets out a plan to deal with it & it doesnt work, thats just how it is. The players could juggle the ball as they run around the pitch, that would be impressive to. They could only go for sliding tackles endlessly, regardless of whether it was a good moment or not. Again it would make it more entertaining. The problem is, neither tactic would be very effective. Barcelonas passing game doesnt mean anything if they find a side they cant use it against. A result for football tonight would have been chelsea getting a pen, barcelona staying on 11 men & seeing how the game turned out that way. Nothing else. Apparently defending doesn't count anymore. It's like a dirty word now. If you go all out attack and neglect the defence then that's true football but if you set up defensively at the expense of the attack then that is totally wrong and evil and must be stopped. End of the day I'd much rather watch Man Utd vs Barca in an all out attacking match rather than Chelsea bore their way into a final to have another penalty shoot out loss against Man Utd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Dont agree with this result for football nonsense. Impressive passing football only has any worth if its effective against the opposition. If the opposition sets out a plan to deal with it & it doesnt work, thats just how it is. The players could juggle the ball as they run around the pitch, that would be impressive to. They could only go for sliding tackles endlessly, regardless of whether it was a good moment or not. Again it would make it more entertaining. The problem is, neither tactic would be very effective. Barcelonas passing game doesnt mean anything if they find a side they cant use it against. A result for football tonight would have been chelsea getting a pen, barcelona staying on 11 men & seeing how the game turned out that way. Nothing else. Spot on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Dont agree with this result for football nonsense. Impressive passing football only has any worth if its effective against the opposition. If the opposition sets out a plan to deal with it & it doesnt work, thats just how it is. The players could juggle the ball as they run around the pitch, that would be impressive to. They could only go for sliding tackles endlessly, regardless of whether it was a good moment or not. Again it would make it more entertaining. The problem is, neither tactic would be very effective. Barcelonas passing game doesnt mean anything if they find a side they cant use it against. A result for football tonight would have been chelsea getting a pen, barcelona staying on 11 men & seeing how the game turned out that way. Nothing else. Apparently defending doesn't count anymore. It's like a dirty word now. If you go all out attack and neglect the defence then that's true football but if you set up defensively at the expense of the attack then that is totally wrong and evil and must be stopped. Football's about scoring goals. If you defend for 90 minutes, the best you can achieve is a 0-0. Surely you can see why people favour teams to attack rather than defend. If teams set up to defend all the time then not only is it shit to watch for the neutral (doesn't count for much, I admit) but it just goes against what the aim of football is: scoring goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Dont agree with this result for football nonsense. Impressive passing football only has any worth if its effective against the opposition. If the opposition sets out a plan to deal with it & it doesnt work, thats just how it is. The players could juggle the ball as they run around the pitch, that would be impressive to. They could only go for sliding tackles endlessly, regardless of whether it was a good moment or not. Again it would make it more entertaining. The problem is, neither tactic would be very effective. Barcelonas passing game doesnt mean anything if they find a side they cant use it against. A result for football tonight would have been chelsea getting a pen, barcelona staying on 11 men & seeing how the game turned out that way. Nothing else. Apparently defending doesn't count anymore. It's like a dirty word now. If you go all out attack and neglect the defence then that's true football but if you set up defensively at the expense of the attack then that is totally wrong and evil and must be stopped. End of the day I'd much rather watch Man Utd vs Barca in an all out attacking match rather than Chelsea bore their way into a final to have another penalty shoot out loss against Man Utd. Tbf Man Utd played pretty much similar to Chelsea did at this stage last season against Barcelona. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 lol'z at Chelsea, couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of tossers. Drogba goes back to the top of my 'biggest knobs in football'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Karma. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I don't like Chelsea anyway, but regardless of the rubbish refereeing, I'm glad they are out. If only because of the way they cheated their way through the match and reacted without any class whatsoever at the final whistle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 http://i44.tinypic.com/dhcx9f.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonarmy Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Barcelona : Possession 70.9 Passing Success 87.7 This is one of the reasons I'm ecstatic that Barca are going through. ManU and Barca will have some real firepower, it should be fun with both teams really going for the win, not just sitting back and hoping for penalties. Based on the way Barca play, it's a real joy to watch them. That said, Chelsea were absolutely robbed. Sure, Chelsea played ugly in the first leg, but they did what they set out to do. Second leg, scored a great goal, and then played defense and counterattacking, which based on their personnel, was the right strategy for them. Can't say I enjoy it, but they did the right thing. They had one stonewall penalty not given, and plenty of others that could have been and probably should have been, but that's irrelevant. They only needed one, and the ref absolutely screwed it up (the red card was also a screwup, and had the result gone differently, I'd be arguing that one as well, but as it is, its the penalties that matter). Quite simply, Chelsea executed their gameplan much better than Barca did and should have gone through but for the worst refereeing I've ever seen. But I still love the looks on the faces of those cheating cunts at Chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 Can someone put a picture up of just drogba's face? I want to set it as my desktop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I don't like Chelsea anyway, but regardless of the rubbish refereeing, I'm glad they are out. If only because of the way they cheated their way through the match and reacted without any class whatsoever at the final whistle. Please explain these examples of Chelsea cheating. Maybe the red card can be considered a dive, but that is really on the ridiculously incompetent Norwegian man in the shiny black shirt. What else are you talking about? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I don't like Chelsea anyway, but regardless of the rubbish refereeing, I'm glad they are out. If only because of the way they cheated their way through the match and reacted without any class whatsoever at the final whistle. Please explain these examples of Chelsea cheating. Maybe the red card can be considered a dive, but that is really on the ridiculously incompetent Norwegian man in the shiny black shirt. What else are you talking about? Drogba. All match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juniatmoko Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 what was hiddink thinking btw. chelsea*lost 1 opponent he didn't keep the players to keep pressing barca. instead doing more defending. it is very s*** tactic, considering the quality that chelsea had through the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I only saw one clear penalty tonight and that was Pique's handball, not sure why the others have been classed as clear cut penalties. If we're talking injustice, why wasn't Henry given a penalty at the Nou Camp? Why was Abidal sent off? Why was Alves booked and as a consequence will miss the final? Why did the ref not react to Iniesta being constantly hacked? Chelsea were exposed for what they were tonight. Dirty, undignified wankers who played to nullify a football match rather than take part in it, they got everything they deserved. Can't wait until UEFA throw the book at them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted May 6, 2009 Share Posted May 6, 2009 I don't like Chelsea anyway, but regardless of the rubbish refereeing, I'm glad they are out. If only because of the way they cheated their way through the match and reacted without any class whatsoever at the final whistle. Please explain these examples of Chelsea cheating. Maybe the red card can be considered a dive, but that is really on the ridiculously incompetent Norwegian man in the shiny black shirt. What else are you talking about? Drogba dropping like a fly on numerous occasions. Cole diving whenever anyone actually touched him. Ballack and Lampard with ticky-tacky fouls to stop the game. Iniesta constantly scythed down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts