Dave Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I fully expect some interesting stories over the weekend about it though. Leaktastic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 25 Sep 2009 LMA STATEMENT REGARDING KEVIN KEEGAN Following the conclusion of the arbitration process between Kevin Keegan and Newcastle United Football Club, Richard Bevan, Chief Executive of the LMA made this statement; “Having heard the evidence from both sides, the Panel has reserved judgement and there will be no further comment on the process until the Panel have received their bribes over the weekend.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I fully expect some interesting stories over the weekend about it though. Leaktastic. notw must love this, plenty of room for them to employ their usual journalistic approach-make it up. And what about Alan oliver his "insights" will be interesting reading as works of fiction Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Is it right that if Kevin Keegan receives his compensation we can go into administration? The Mother reckons that el radio-stacion says that loik. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Is it right that if Kevin Keegan receives his compensation we can go into administration? The Mother reckons that el radio-stacion says that loik. The club will go into administration and Keegan will get the club by default instead of his compensation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Is it right that if Kevin Keegan receives his compensation we can go into administration? The Mother reckons that el radio-stacion says that loik. The club will go into administration and Keegan will get the club by default instead of his compensation. I get the impression you're taking the pish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Course Keegan lets his lip wobble, but you can't argue he's wrong and was wrong previously? Surely our relegation and the pathetic way that Ashley has run the club should make you side with Keegan? As for the fact he threatened to walk over Killer and Beardsley - weren't they two of his greatest signings? Maybe he knew how important they'd be and was willing to gamble his job on getting them in? Didn't he say after that though he walked because, 'it wasn't what it said in the brochure', whereas I remember the day he joined second time around that this time he'd barely thought about joining as there was no brochure? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Curious A mutual compensation package of £2m was written into the deal when the adopted Geordie returned to Tyneside as Sam Allardyce’s replacement in January last year, meaning the club had to pay if he was sacked and that he had to if he walked away. from chron http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/nufc/newcastle-united-news/2009/09/25/keegan-and-united-face-wait-in-compensation-case-72703-24782997/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Anyone got any idea who sits on the Tribunal Panel ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Anyone got any idea who sits on the Tribunal Panel ? Whoopie Goldberg, John Travolta and Sting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Anyone got any idea who sits on the Tribunal Panel ? Xisco, Tony Jimenez and Jeff Vetere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 why hasnt he sued west ham? Because Curbs resigned while KK believes he was constructively dismissed is my take on it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 why hasnt he sued west ham? Because Curbs resigned while KK believes he was constructively dismissed is my take on it. has to be the correct answer. KK resigned cos he was lied to. curbs perhaps wasnt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 why hasnt he sued west ham? Because Curbs resigned while KK believes he was constructively dismissed is my take on it. curbs did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Then again maybe Curbs is fighting WHU for cash. A link from 2009: http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/No-move-for-Curbishley.5167514.jp Looking on Knees Up Mother Brown (WHU board) nothing is settled with in Aug 09 going off the posts in this thread: http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115457&p=2298460 I let myself down by thinking Libby was posting a fact about Curbs not suing WHU by replying without doing a various googles search. No need to fee guilty Lib's you & the wrong end of the stick are a item & I know this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 why hasnt he sued west ham? Because Curbs resigned while KK believes he was constructively dismissed is my take on it. curbs did. I know that now but like a plumb I took Libbys post at face value. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 unforgivable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 why hasnt he sued west ham? Because Curbs resigned while KK believes he was constructively dismissed is my take on it. curbs did. I know that now but like a plumb I took Libbys post at face value. likewise. does that make us a pair of plumbs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Libertine Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Then again maybe Curbs is fighting WHU for cash. A link from 2009: http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/No-move-for-Curbishley.5167514.jp Looking on Knees Up Mother Brown (WHU board) nothing is settled with in Aug 09 going off the posts in this thread: http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115457&p=2298460 I let myself down by thinking Libby was posting a fact about Curbs not suing WHU by replying without doing a various googles search. No need to fee guilty Lib's you & the wrong end of the stick are a item & I know this. if you carried on reading you'd have seen me say soon after i didnt know he was suing them. looks like the stick is 2 timing us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Anyone got any idea who sits on the Tribunal Panel ? They get a spread of people media, current/former football directors, former managers & someone with a legal background. For this case it was Beasley, Kelmsley, Kinnear & Mort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Then again maybe Curbs is fighting WHU for cash. A link from 2009: http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/No-move-for-Curbishley.5167514.jp Looking on Knees Up Mother Brown (WHU board) nothing is settled with in Aug 09 going off the posts in this thread: http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115457&p=2298460 I let myself down by thinking Libby was posting a fact about Curbs not suing WHU by replying without doing a various googles search. No need to fee guilty Lib's you & the wrong end of the stick are a item & I know this. if you carried on reading you'd have seen me say soon after i didnt know he was suing them. looks like the stick is 2 timing us Not really I was replying to your posts as I read them. You just like posting your toxic drivel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Libertine Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Then again maybe Curbs is fighting WHU for cash. A link from 2009: http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/No-move-for-Curbishley.5167514.jp Looking on Knees Up Mother Brown (WHU board) nothing is settled with in Aug 09 going off the posts in this thread: http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115457&p=2298460 I let myself down by thinking Libby was posting a fact about Curbs not suing WHU by replying without doing a various googles search. No need to fee guilty Lib's you & the wrong end of the stick are a item & I know this. if you carried on reading you'd have seen me say soon after i didnt know he was suing them. looks like the stick is 2 timing us Not really I was replying to your posts as I read them. You just like posting your toxic drivel. and you got the wrong end of the stick by doing so. unlucky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Then again maybe Curbs is fighting WHU for cash. A link from 2009: http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/No-move-for-Curbishley.5167514.jp Looking on Knees Up Mother Brown (WHU board) nothing is settled with in Aug 09 going off the posts in this thread: http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115457&p=2298460 I let myself down by thinking Libby was posting a fact about Curbs not suing WHU by replying without doing a various googles search. No need to fee guilty Lib's you & the wrong end of the stick are a item & I know this. if you carried on reading you'd have seen me say soon after i didnt know he was suing them. looks like the stick is 2 timing us Not really I was replying to your posts as I read them. You just like posting your toxic drivel. and you got the wrong end of the stick by doing so. unlucky. As I said earlier on I know I let myself down by replying to you please don't rub it in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Libertine Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 Then again maybe Curbs is fighting WHU for cash. A link from 2009: http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/No-move-for-Curbishley.5167514.jp Looking on Knees Up Mother Brown (WHU board) nothing is settled with in Aug 09 going off the posts in this thread: http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115457&p=2298460 I let myself down by thinking Libby was posting a fact about Curbs not suing WHU by replying without doing a various googles search. No need to fee guilty Lib's you & the wrong end of the stick are a item & I know this. if you carried on reading you'd have seen me say soon after i didnt know he was suing them. looks like the stick is 2 timing us Not really I was replying to your posts as I read them. You just like posting your toxic drivel. and you got the wrong end of the stick by doing so. unlucky. As I said earlier on I know I let myself down by replying to you please don't rub it in. and yet you keep replying. you must be very ashamed of yourself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 C'mon Keegan - get every penny of the fat gitt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts