Jump to content

Recommended Posts

                        Hart                           

            Smalling    Caulker

Clyne                                    Shaw

              Wilshere    Cleverley

                      Lallana

Sterling                                  Ox

                      Rooney

Link to post
Share on other sites

That first team Deuce posted is probably there or thereabouts. CB is an issue, and I'd probably have Oxlade-Chamberlain instead of Walcott because (a) I really like him (b) he's got a bit more power and presence if you need to defend. Ashley Young has blown hot and cold too.

 

We have a fair few players who are about the same level who could comfortably slot in. Walcott, Caulker, Cleverly, Walker - you wouldn't be too unhappy at giving them a game too. The problem is that you need at least four or five classy players to convince at this level, plus you need a coherent unit around them. We rarely have the same team together, and don't seem to have a consistent way of playing either. We really should have the players to keep the ball, yet they are so often injured (Wilshere, Cleverly) or fighting a losing battle because the team hasn't knitted together.

 

Unfortunately I only got to watch the San Marino game this week, and you can't take much away from that. I'd be very interested to see how much our team differs game-to-game compared with other international sides. Not pre-empting that at all, but if we actually play the same players regularly (compared to, say, the Netherlands) then there is no excuse for Hodgson. If we make more changes than most, then that might be a major issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd have put youngsters in. Id have picked Rooney purely as a centre forward, and I would probably have made him captain. Don't want him dropping deep . Id have the likes of Caulker, Sterling, Ox, Clyne and Shaw all starting now. Let's build for 2018. We will do f*** all in 2014 even if we qualify.

 

I broadly agree, but Sterling has been really poor for a while. Maybe too young, and just needs a break.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to see Lallana given an opportunity. As Lampard/Gerrard are phased out, England won't have many attacking midfielders. Unless you want to play Rooney in that role, which I'm not sure is ideal. Lallana has been quality for Southampton.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sterling and Ox have done very little to be starting for England IMO.

 

It's obviously a difficult balance like, but I don't think you can treat the current England team as just a youth side for 2018. If these players do amazing at their clubs they will come in when they're ready.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sterling had done fuck all, Clyne is very weak defensively and Shaw is about as raw as you can get. All 3 should be nowhere near the England team right now, all 3 need to first of all establish themselves as premiership players.

 

Caulker is ready, Ox is dangerous, they should be starting.

 

I'd have Rooney upfront with Walcott, Ox on the right, Wilshere in the middle with a senior player Carrick/Gerrard, the rest whatever is available. Glen Johnson is easily the best RB available, Cole is still the best LB, Hart is the best GK, with the absolute lack of talent on the left I'd probably put Baines there for tough games and try Cleverly there for easier ties.

 

Just leaves the best fit partner for Caulker, probably Terry but England have fucked that up.

 

 

                Hart

 

Johnson Caulker Terry Cole

 

        Carrick  Wilshere

 

Ox.                        Baines

 

      Walcott    Rooney

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting question - would we rather have 'top 4' bit-part players or those who are starting regularly for bottom clubs?

 

Neither. The Big 4 doesn't exist anymore. Rightfully, only key Arsenal and Liverpool players start. Milner lacks quality but he's a real option for City. Lescott is on the fringes and shouldn't play for England.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hodgson is crap too. Honestly, rather have 'Arry. Hodgson waited and waited to make a sub. Reminded me of Pardew.

 

Absolutely, Harry is a much better manager, putting his personality aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sterling, maybe in a few years. The danger with him is "doing a Walcott" where you rush everything. He needs a huge amount of work on his game, he's incredibly raw and shouldn't be in the squad.

 

That said, I'm a fan of Walcott and he should definitely be there or thereabouts in the team. If nothing else, he's one of the fastest players I've seen which is always going to create chances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sterling, maybe in a few years. The danger with him is "doing a Walcott" where you rush everything. He needs a huge amount of work on his game, he's incredibly raw and shouldn't be in the squad.

 

That said, I'm a fan of Walcott and he should definitely be there or thereabouts in the team. If nothing else, he's one of the fastest players I've seen which is always going to create chances.

 

I'm selecting the likes of Shaw and Clyne  in an attempt for us to be rebuilding now. Should have been started post 2010, and we may have built a side ready for 2016. We are 2 years behind now. I agree Walcott should be a focal point now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why people still think Oxlade is ready he clearly isn't.

 

Mentally, physically etc etc he still has a long way to go and the best bit of all right now he has 0 end product.

 

There is a reason he doesn't start for his club, he is just simply not ready for this level yet.

 

If Walcott was performing the way Oxlade is you wouldn't hear the end of it of how crap he is and if Oxlade had performed like Walcott has this season he will be gods gift to football.

 

Dem juicy double standards :megusta:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oxlade moved to arsenal too soon, he's not getting regular enough football to develop and is too wanted to be let out on loan. Doubt he'll make much in his career because of it, being harsh maybe but don't think he looks like forcing his way into the arsenal squad soon, he should leave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oxlade moved to arsenal too soon, he's not getting regular enough football to develop and is too wanted to be let out on loan. Doubt he'll make much in his career because of it, being harsh maybe but don't think he looks like forcing his way into the arsenal squad soon, he should leave.

 

Agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the Ox, I think Wenger is wary of the Wilshere situation, where he was over-played at a young age and ended up out for a year with injury. His inexperience shows at times, but his all-round ability is outstanding. He should become one of the best players in the world, and to have him and Wilshere together in England teams for the next 10 years is something to look forward to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...