Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 So is the term arse bandit out of order too? How can a thread about a good honest interview by a player turn into such a fkn whingfest? because there's many on here who take a simple,harmless,jibe way out of proportion by trying to be all pc . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 your views on Xisco, Martins and basically everything are beyond ridiculous. You beg for the response you've recieved Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 your views on Xisco, Martins and basically everything are beyond ridiculous. You beg for the response you've recieved 88 appearances, 28 goals.shit return for a £10m striker. don't dress it up any other way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 it's actually 34 goals. Better than 1 in 3 which isn't quite a shit return imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 it's actually 34 goals. Better than 1 in 3 which isn't quite a shit return imo fuck me, an extra 6 goals. he's a headless chicken. utter shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 Not sure what Xisco has to say tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 and how many would he have to score before you'd call him a good striker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 and how many would he have to score before you'd call him a good striker? 40+ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 says it all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 says it all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 says it all In what way? As in he's only 6 short or you think 40+ is a ridiculous number? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 says it all 88 appearances, 40+ goals. not much to ask for a cunt on 70k p/w Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 What are we asking from Martins? That he score 1 in 2? Something that without penalites not even Shearer got anywhere near 6 goals the difference between shite and good apparently. I'm not saying 34 goals is owt to be proud of like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 We paid 10m for a lunatic playing about a 1/2 hr a month for Inter. End of story. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 6 goals the difference between shite and good apparently. not really. his overall play has to be considered, especially as he's not a natural goalscorer. what he lacks in goalscoring ability he should make up for in team-play, playing ability and work-rate. none of the last three are existent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 6 goals the difference between s**** and good apparently. not really. his overall play has to be considered, especially as he's not a natural goalscorer. what he lacks in goalscoring ability he should make up for in team-play, playing ability and work-rate. none of the last three are existent. You said 34 goals was shite. Then I asked how many he'd have to score for you to consider him good and you said '40+' make your mind up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 6 goals the difference between s**** and good apparently. not really. his overall play has to be considered, especially as he's not a natural goalscorer. what he lacks in goalscoring ability he should make up for in team-play, playing ability and work-rate. none of the last three are existent. You said 34 goals was shite. Then I asked how many he'd have to score for you to consider him good and you said '40+' make your mind up they could be 6 penalties.it was a pretty shite question in all honesty. i would accept the useless fuckwit if he did have those three assets i mentioned in my previous quote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 6 goals the difference between s**** and good apparently. not really. his overall play has to be considered, especially as he's not a natural goalscorer. what he lacks in goalscoring ability he should make up for in team-play, playing ability and work-rate. none of the last three are existent. You said 34 goals was s****. Then I asked how many he'd have to score for you to consider him good and you said '40+' make your mind up they could be 6 penalties.it was a pretty s**** question in all honesty. i would accept the useless fuckwit if he did have those three assets i mentioned in my previous quote. well than I ask you again, how many goals per season would he have to score to justify his selection? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 6 goals the difference between s**** and good apparently. not really. his overall play has to be considered, especially as he's not a natural goalscorer. what he lacks in goalscoring ability he should make up for in team-play, playing ability and work-rate. none of the last three are existent. You said 34 goals was s****. Then I asked how many he'd have to score for you to consider him good and you said '40+' make your mind up they could be 6 penalties.it was a pretty s**** question in all honesty. i would accept the useless fuckwit if he did have those three assets i mentioned in my previous quote. well than I ask you again, how many goals per season would he have to score to justify his selection? and i remind you again: scenario 1: to justify his selection if he's to score a fucking abysmal amount (like this season) he must make up for it by putting a fucking good shift in, have good work rate, team play, ability and a good attitude. none of them are existent scenario 2: 20+ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 You expect 20+ from Martins in that team? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 You expect 20+ from Martins in that team? aye.why not? i also expect him to take a penalty with his stronger foot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 You expect 20+ from Martins in that team? No one would get 20+ in that team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 <Snipped!> Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 I can't believe people are biting at the 2nd coming of InvictaToon... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 <Snipped!> Thanks for posting that trojan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now