cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I don't know how anyone, after reading the pdf, can not side with KK. He was right to resign and the club were wrong for a) agreeing to a contract which they had no intention of fulfilling, and more egregiously, b) for lying and misleading KK, the public and the fans for the duration of KK's tenure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Does this not happen quite often though, a player is bought or sold without the manager being 100% in favour? I would think it does. I agree KK was right to be annoyed and object to it, but not whether it really amounts to constructive dismissal. Farcical behaviour from the club though obviously, seems like even they didn't know what they had said about who would have final say on transfers. If this really did happen to keep agents happy then it's unforgivable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE6 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Keegan was right to be pissed off about it, but I still don't feel that was enough to make him resign. He could have easily just ignored him from the squad if he didn't like him. Doesn't change the fact Ashley, Wise and Llambias are cunts. Thick cunt, would you continue to work for a scumbag? 5.2 The Club admitted to the Tribunal that it repeatedly and intentionally misled the press, public and the fans of Newcastle United. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broony Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 This has been completely brushed under the carpet by SSN and Ashley's puppet David Craig. The focus is on the 25m claim. I'm at work so haven't seen this, whats the 25M claim? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 This has been completely brushed under the carpet by SSN and Ashley's puppet David Craig. The focus is on the 25m claim. I'm at work so haven't seen this, whats the 25M claim? The rest of his contract paid up and 16m 'stigma' damages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Where is it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 So it all comes down to Nacho? What about the Milner sale and Xisco, did Keegan approve those? think youre missing the point a bit. nacho deal was the specific grounds keegan's legal team used to fight the claim, and it's referred to as a 'last straw'. there's other stuff that has gone on, as the pdf mentions in passing, but they haven't been used to fight this particular legal battle. the pdf isnt a judgement on every single little thing that went on. Exactly. The pdf focuses on the one issue - signing Nacho - and KK has been proved absolutely right in this case I suppose now KK should also get the benefit of the doubt for all the other s*** that went on - the Milner sale, him and Wise etc. i would like keegan to write a book on this, could be a good read He may have to to make ends meet. I wonder what percentage of football managers would have just kept quiet and been complicit to such a deal ? Sadly in today's world, most I would think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 So we are in the championshio now because of Nacho fucking Gonzalez? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Where is it? its in this or the other thread, somewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest aoliversaknob Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Total vindication for KK. Never doubted it would be all along! As for them other cunts - Just shows them up for the useless, bunch of amatuers they really are. Just the decision to let this go to tribunal speaks volumse about their lack of competence, class and business acumen. Nevermind, the constructive dismisal, lieing to press and fans, singing some muppet as a favour to an agent that could be looked up on youtube. How that fat fucker has made so much money I will never know. Completely out of there depth. Ruining our club and tryied to destroy KK. Wankers! I pray to god the bastard also gets caught out all this Sports direct jjb shite as well.... then the fat fuck might finally get what is coming to him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Where is it? its in this or the other thread, somewhere. is it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 one way to look at it is that Gonzalez has cult status. Unheard of, 20 or so minutes of first team football and all this hoo-ha, that could be argued ended in relegation. Its some acheivement! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Where is it? its in this or the other thread, somewhere. is it? If you look at the top it has page numbers, you will find that its possible to view things before the last post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I dont mind Ashley to be fair he gives hope to millions of us that any mug can become a billionaire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Where is it? its in this or the other thread, somewhere. is it? reply no 28 this thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). Where's it say this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest aoliversaknob Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I dont mind Ashley to be fair he gives hope to millions of us that any mug can become a billionaire. Liking it Spence.......must be the fuckers on y redeeming feature though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Where is it? its in this or the other thread, somewhere. is it? reply no 28 this thread omg vindicated Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Finally, this is over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliGupter Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Philip Havers Qc is Nigel Havers' brother, just thought you might like to know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Also worth noting that KK agreed that the 'stigma' damages didn't need to be awarded if the tribunal published their findings and thereby restore his reputation (which imo it certainly did). what we as fans think of him , means more to him than money. I hope he speaks out now. you havent read his statement ?? No, I read most of the PDF but not Keegan's statement. then i guess you should. Where is it? its in this or the other thread, somewhere. is it? reply no 28 this thread omg vindicated yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 I dont mind Ashley to be fair he gives hope to millions of us that any mug can become a billionaire. Liking it Spence.......must be the fuckers on y redeeming feature though Afternoon Addy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now