Ketsbaia Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Its a shame though, because I was hoping he'd be proved wrong by having no Prem clubs after him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Stoke Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Watch the detestable c*nt score against us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Agreed. Such a delectable club. fucking spell check and me not paying attention Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Didn't he refuse them a few years ago before he went to ManU? Or was it Hull? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The best thing is that there isn't a club in the land that are less suited to how he plays. My bet is that they'll try him in the Nolan to Carroll role. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyeyzzon Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The best thing is that there isn't a club in the land that are less suited to how he plays. My bet is that they'll try him in the Nolan to Carroll role. Aye, with Crouch in there the flick-on will be a more common fixture now that they've got a finisher. Doubt his legs could still take the runs following the flick-ons though, but then again, it worked okay for Nolan... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest n4e Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Poll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jimmyc84 Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 I've always thought he looks a bit like Tryone Dobbs from Corrie... anyone else? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ieqsyxnYlNo/TQzUYWXe_DI/AAAAAAAAMRE/B5rnLd-hZhw/s1600/tyrone1.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The Poll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 I've always thought he looks a bit like Tryone Dobbs from Corrie... anyone else? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ieqsyxnYlNo/TQzUYWXe_DI/AAAAAAAAMRE/B5rnLd-hZhw/s1600/tyrone1.jpg http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxc4c2GkhW1qg9bnto2_500.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Wont have finished work by then. Shame. The Everton game, maybe? I'm not Treacle, I'm from Cov., but know a lot of Nuneaton gadgies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Thought Stoke said they'd pay him PER GAME he played and Owen said he didn't want that No surprise. Seeing as he spends less time playing football than he does singing tenor at Albert Hall So have Stoke went back or did the Horse whisperer ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Stoke City FC @stokecity Stoke City are delighted to announce the signing of Michael Owen on a one-year deal, subject to Premier League Board approval Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Apparently it IS a "Paid as you play" contract. Well done Stoke, calling the b*stards bluff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyeyzzon Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Prolly wanted to avoid injuries by going to the Thugby team. Much more peaceful in the Prem now that Barton, de Jong and the Wolves team out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Mongo Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 To be fair, it's the ultimate test for a footballer, trying to perform on a cold night at the Britannia Stadium. Now he'll get the chance every other week (injuries permitting). I'm sure he'll relish the challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 The poll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyeyzzon Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 He'll be satisfied as long as he has a good goals per game ratio, even if he plays almost nowt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesPaul Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 He'll be satisfied as long as he has a good goals per game ratio, even if he plays almost nowt. http://img.math-fail.com/images-old/divide-by-zero6.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyeyzzon Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 He'll be satisfied as long as he has a good goals per game ratio, even if he plays almost nowt. http://img.math-fail.com/images-old/divide-by-zero6.jpg True Story. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Apparently it IS a "Paid as you play" contract. Well done Stoke, calling the b*stards bluff. Didn't Pulis recently come out with quotes to the effect that he would still get a base salary even if not playing? It's just significantly less than if he does play? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Think Stoke have done quite decent business here if it's on a pay as you play deal. Only time will tell, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted September 4, 2012 Share Posted September 4, 2012 Apparently it IS a "Paid as you play" contract. Well done Stoke, calling the b*stards bluff. Didn't Pulis recently come out with quotes to the effect that he would still get a base salary even if not playing? It's just significantly less than if he does play? Reckon that's more usual than getting nowt as a basic wage, btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now