LiquidAK Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 You're wrong. [/ronaldo] Directed at TRon btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 Could not see us playing two lightweights in Loven & Moses up front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 Hope to god we get him ,huge potential etc and bags of confidence and skill would love to see both him and Ranger together Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 Could not see us playing two lightweights in Loven & Moses up front. We did it for the large portions (our best portions actually) of last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Could not see us playing two lightweights in Loven & Moses up front. There's definitely flaws in the theory like. There's some physical brutes in this division and there'd be games where they'd probably be bullied out of it. But it'd be a nice option to have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Loven is prem quality He thought that as well until no prem team came in for him even when he was out of contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 And he was right then to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Wasn't it us who didn't offer him a contract? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Could not see us playing two lightweights in Loven & Moses up front. There's definitely flaws in the theory like. There's some physical brutes in this division and there'd be games where they'd probably be bullied out of it. But it'd be a nice option to have. its an option to be used but i'd prefer to have a more physical striker there, Ameobi seems the obvious one as he can hit the net on a semi regular basis unlike carroll. Ranger too could do a job but i'd worry about 2 teens as first choice strikers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Mike Ashley has seemingly woken up and is smelling the coffee. Encouraging stuff, this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Wasn't it us who didn't offer him a contract? We did offer him a contract. That's why he's playing for us rather than some prem team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Wasn't it us who didn't offer him a contract? We did offer him a contract. That's why he's playing for us rather than some prem team. Aye, after sending him a letter to tell him we didn't want him anymore at the end of last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Mike Ashley has seemingly woken up and is smelling the coffee. Encouraging stuff, this. Let's not speak too soon. But hopefully you're right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Wasn't it us who didn't offer him a contract? We did offer him a contract. That's why he's playing for us rather than some prem team. Aye, after sending him a letter to tell him we didn't want him anymore at the end of last season. Wasn't a case of "not wanting him". He didn't have a contract. Had as much right to go to training that day as Viduka & Cacapa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Mike Ashley has seemingly woken up and is smelling the coffee. Encouraging stuff, this. Let's not speak too soon. But hopefully you're right. Oh I'm under no delusions that he's doing it for good/philanthropic reasons...not a bit of it. He's merely speculating to accumulate, but that suits us all...right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 What does philanthropic mean? I've looked up Google definitions but i'm struggling to tie it to what you're saying GM. That's not being a cheeky twat btw - i'm genuinely a bit confused. Are you saying he's appeasing the fans? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Absolutely, but we're desperate need of a striker, have been for 4 weeks and still don't have one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Mike Ashley has seemingly woken up and is smelling the coffee. Encouraging stuff, this. Let's not speak too soon. But hopefully you're right. Oh I'm under no delusions that he's doing it for good/philanthropic reasons...not a bit of it. He's merely speculating to accumulate, but that suits us all...right? or maybe he still loves us all and wants us back and this window is a "hey sorry about all the shit ive brought, friends?" thing. probably not now i think on it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Wasn't it us who didn't offer him a contract? We did offer him a contract. That's why he's playing for us rather than some prem team. Aye, after sending him a letter to tell him we didn't want him anymore at the end of last season. We obviously wanted him more than any other team at the end of the day. Pretty hard to argue with that since he's here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Wasn't it us who didn't offer him a contract? We did offer him a contract. That's why he's playing for us rather than some prem team. Aye, after sending him a letter to tell him we didn't want him anymore at the end of last season. We obviously wanted him more than any other team at the end of the day. Pretty hard to argue with that since he's here. And I am pleased. Have been a fan of his since his days at Rangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 What does philanthropic mean? I've looked up Google definitions but i'm struggling to tie it to what you're saying GM. That's not being a cheeky twat btw - i'm genuinely a bit confused. Are you saying he's appeasing the fans? I mean he's not doing it for the love of the fans/club - he's just doing it for business reasons. Eiher way, suits us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 I like Lovenkrands, but there's very little to suggest he's of premiership quality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudToBeAGeordie Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 has he signed yet?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Can we get back to Moses please? I hope Jesus comes with him aswell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now