Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why is that harsh? He's not what we need, and he's not exactly set the Premier League alight.

 

Showed enough when he first joined I think!

 

By the way we're not Arsenal you know. Chamakh would be a bit of a coup I reckon.

 

More of a hold up player so would agree with that point, but certainly good enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chamakh is very average, and gutless.

 

Better than all of our current strikers though. No?

 

I don't get that argument. Surely we should aim higher than just "better"? That's leaving out the fact that we really need a certain type of striker, and not just anything better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chamakh is very average, and gutless.

 

Better than all of our current strikers though. No?

 

I don't get that argument. Surely we should aim higher than just "better"? That's leaving out the fact that we really need a certain type of striker, and not just anything better.

 

I agree with your point that we could do with a different type of striker.

 

If for whatever reason we are not able to identify a faster, more mobile striker, and we then get Chamakh. I think it's a good move.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What?! No friggin loan deals please! If so, it had better be permanent.

 

Macheda seems like the sort that might be looking to move on to play more, with the emergence of Chicharito and Wellbeck, as he is well down the line now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...