littlelunchbox Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 no doubt biting in the game of football is bad for the image of the Premier league. but like many have said, as dangerous that bite was compared to the tackle on hairdara? As much as i hate the rat, 10 game is harsh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 10 matches. Fair play to the FA this time round. Hope we play them when he's still serving his ban next season. Wouldn't be surprised if he's not even in the league next season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Has he gotten any ban for elbowing that (?)Chilean player by any chance? Edit: His ban in Holland for the same offence was 2 imposed by Ajax and 7 by the league fwiw. Ongoing I think. Not that he's that type of player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Amazing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Has he gotten any ban for elbowing that (?)Chilean player by any chance? Edit: His ban in Holland for the same offence was 2 imposed by Ajax and 7 by the league fwiw. Ongoing I think. Not that he's that type of player. Fifa have taken over the sentence of it so is very much still ongoing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 no doubt biting in the game of football is bad for the image of the Premier league. but like many have said, as dangerous that bite was compared to the tackle on hairdara? As much as i hate the rat, 10 game is harsh. Provable levels of intent. There was no doubt Suarez intended to bite Ivanovic. It's also not a part of the body generally used in the game that can cause injury. He bit the cunt, man. And he's a cunt. 10 games is spot on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=305346.0 - for all your guffawing needs. That is a thing of beauty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=305346.0 - for all your guffawing needs. That is a thing of beauty. That's a joke. Suarez should get out of this country. With a NUFC player avatar. Who's that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Slippery Sam Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if he appeals this there is a chance he will play this weekend if the appeal isn't before the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=305346.0 - for all your guffawing needs. That is a thing of beauty. That's a joke. Suarez should get out of this country. With a NUFC player avatar. Who's that? Juventus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 10 games is in no way harsh. Comparing it to bad tackles is nonsense basically. He bit someone, and his behavioural record is appalling. Jesus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=305346.0 - for all your guffawing needs. That is a thing of beauty. That's a joke. Suarez should get out of this country. With a NUFC player avatar. Who's that? Should've gone to Specsavers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if he appeals this there is a chance he will play this weekend if the appeal isn't before the game. I don't know, his appeal is against the length of the ban rather than his guilt. Not sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Hope they appeal and the FA raise it to 15. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Might have been asked, but say if he leaves and joins Bayern (or anyone foreign) will he still have to complete the ban? I think Barton had to sit out a few Marseille games, but Suarez didnt complete his Dutch ban here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if he appeals this there is a chance he will play this weekend if the appeal isn't before the game. I don't know, his appeal is against the length of the ban rather than his guilt. Not sure. First 3 games are guaranteed. Theres no chance of this happening at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Slippery Sam Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if he appeals this there is a chance he will play this weekend if the appeal isn't before the game. I don't know, his appeal is against the length of the ban rather than his guilt. Not sure. Something tells me I'm right. Could be from one of the [many] earlier famous bans. I'll happily be corrected though, if someone can come up with the definitive rule. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Might have been asked, but say if he leaves and joins Bayern (or anyone foreign) will he still have to complete the ban? I think Barton had to sit out a few Marseille games, but Suarez didnt complete his Dutch ban here Yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if he appeals this there is a chance he will play this weekend if the appeal isn't before the game. I don't know, his appeal is against the length of the ban rather than his guilt. Not sure. Something tells me I'm right. Could be from one of the [many] earlier famous bans. I'll happily be corrected though, if someone can come up with the definitive rule. Its been answered several time in last few pages Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Juventus. Should've gone to Specsavers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisJbarnes Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Some of them talking about loaning him to a League of Ireland team over the summer so he can serve his ban there. Hello, I would like to file a racism report with the FA. I feel that the 10 game ban handed out to Luis Suarez is nothing short of racial behaviour on the part of the FA. In its own statement the FA claims: - “The Football Association is committed to tackling all forms of discrimination and harassment and to promoting equality. We have already made considerable progress in tackling racism and have been working hard to ensure race equality at all levels of the game.” http://www.thefa.com/contact-thefa When compared to a simple yellow card handed to Defoe for the same exact if not worse incident with Mascherano and various extremely dangerous tackles that sometimes even ended player careers that were punished by a standard 3 game ban or not punished at all, this 10 game ban is clearly and utterly unequal. A simple bite that didn’t even mark Ivanovic’s hand cannot be worse than racial abuse that resulted in an 8 game ban to the same Suarez. Apart from the fact that, that racial abuse was a fabricated lie as well. Hence by the FA’s own statements the FA is guilty of racial discrimination against Luis Suarez. As a football fan and firm believer in fair play and equality, I am completely and utterly disgusted by the FA’s unjust and unfair treatment of Luis Suarez. Please explain to me how the FA can be taken seriously, when the same FA decided to appeal a 3 game ban handed to Rooney for kicking Miodrag Dzudovic, which incident was classified as assault. I do not expect the FA to come with a reasonable answer, seeing that the FA has a clear and shameless bias against Luis Suarez and LFC in general. Thank you for taking the time to read this or not. Regards, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Slippery Sam Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong, but if he appeals this there is a chance he will play this weekend if the appeal isn't before the game. I don't know, his appeal is against the length of the ban rather than his guilt. Not sure. Something tells me I'm right. Could be from one of the [many] earlier famous bans. I'll happily be corrected though, if someone can come up with the definitive rule. Its been answered several time in last few pages Thanks. My mother always said never to go backwards in life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That's so fucking funny Liverpool fans are going to wanking furiously over their victimisation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Some of them talking about loaning him to a League of Ireland team over the summer so he can serve his ban there. Hello, I would like to file a racism report with the FA. I feel that the 10 game ban handed out to Luis Suarez is nothing short of racial behaviour on the part of the FA. In its own statement the FA claims: - “The Football Association is committed to tackling all forms of discrimination and harassment and to promoting equality. We have already made considerable progress in tackling racism and have been working hard to ensure race equality at all levels of the game.” http://www.thefa.com/contact-thefa When compared to a simple yellow card handed to Defoe for the same exact if not worse incident with Mascherano and various extremely dangerous tackles that sometimes even ended player careers that were punished by a standard 3 game ban or not punished at all, this 10 game ban is clearly and utterly unequal. A simple bite that didn’t even mark Ivanovic’s hand cannot be worse than racial abuse that resulted in an 8 game ban to the same Suarez. Apart from the fact that, that racial abuse was a fabricated lie as well. Hence by the FA’s own statements the FA is guilty of racial discrimination against Luis Suarez. As a football fan and firm believer in fair play and equality, I am completely and utterly disgusted by the FA’s unjust and unfair treatment of Luis Suarez. Please explain to me how the FA can be taken seriously, when the same FA decided to appeal a 3 game ban handed to Rooney for kicking Miodrag Dzudovic, which incident was classified as assault. I do not expect the FA to come with a reasonable answer, seeing that the FA has a clear and shameless bias against Luis Suarez and LFC in general. Thank you for taking the time to read this or not. Regards, Love the victim complex they've got. When will this nightmare end? Was one post I read Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I don't understand the outrage at all. If he played for Newcastle I would still be keen to see him banned for as long as possible. It beggars belief that anyone could object to it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now