Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Football/Clubs/Club_Home/2013/7/30/1375198489160/Liverpool-FC-produce-a-do-001.jpg

 

Probably not the best worksheet to use in the collocation bingo game then

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

why don't they just hire stewards smart enough to be able to understand what language used is discriminatory?

 

Impossible, this is too sensible and full of common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

FAN: 'Lend us a fag will you? I forgot mine whilst listening to the HT scores on my tranny radio; a queer turn of events that could've handicapped my enjoyment of today's match. Oh well, best nip that in the bud. Are we in the coloured shirts today? Midget gem anyone?'

 

STEWARD: Well fuck my O-zone...*rolls sleeves up* When these perps gonna learn they in my yard now....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

FAN: 'Lend us a fag will you? I forgot mine whilst listening to the HT scores on my tranny radio; a queer turn of events that could've handicapped my enjoyment of today's match. Oh well, best nip that in the bud. Are we in the coloured shirts today? Midget gem anyone?'

 

STEWARD: Well fuck my O-zone...*rolls sleeves up* When these perps gonna learn they in my yard now....

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it simply that if you lodge a bid high enough to trigger the clause the buying club is allowed to discuss terms with the player before the two clubs have actually agreed terms?

 

Seems a stupid clause to have, but if memory serves its similar to that Swansea left back we tried to buy (Neil Taylor?)

 

In all likelihood it's tricky wording of the clause that lets a foolish player think it's a release clause when actually it's not (ref Redknapp and the Croatian centre-half he stitched up - Stimac?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wondered about that clause when it was first reported. What would be the point in a clause that allowed the buyer to speak to the player if Liverpool could still stop him leaving?

 

Swansea had one with Neil Taylor didn't they? Something like we could talk to him, but they could still reject our bid. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/aug/03/luis-suarez-liverpool-steven-gerrard#start-of-comments

 

The comment under this sums it up

 

"That just showed you the class of the Liverpool supporters"

he drags the club through the mud, spends vital matches out, has clubmates and managers put (or destroy) their reputations for him - then stabs them in the back by openly flirting with other clubs, demanding a transfer and threatening legal action...

...and the fans still cheer him.

i'd replace 'class' in that sentence by a number of other words. 'delusion' would be the first. sad reflection on modern football that the fans will accept anything to keep a star player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...