Flip Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Milan are outmourinhoing Mourinho with all that rolling around and timewasting. Mourinho just outmourinhoed them. Put all attackers on and scored. That's not outmourinhoing though! Madrid keeps its record of never winning at San Siro. (always looking at the bright side, irrelevant game anyway) Whatever But I wonder, did Allegri lose them two points or did Mourinho win them one point? I feel Allegri made bad decisions, especially the one taking pato out and putting Ambrosini on even if they scored three minutes later. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Rather, Inzaghi has won them one point. Milan never ever looked to get anything from this game to be completely honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 arsenal score finish 2-1??? we gonna face a deflated team or hells fury? hells fury Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 there's blatantly some Bleakley-related tension in the ITV studio between Chiles and Lampard when they weren't on air. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 there's blatantly some Bleakley-related tension in the ITV studio between Chiles and Lampard when they weren't on air. didn't even known lampard and bleakley were together Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 there's blatantly some Bleakley-related tension in the ITV studio between Chiles and Lampard when they weren't on air. didn't even known lampard and bleakley were together http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1291640/Frank-Lampard-propose-Christine-Bleakley-weeks.html from July, no idea if they still are now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 get rid of this group stage system. Fucking boring. knock out all the way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 get rid of this group stage system. Fucking boring. knock out all the way. Less games = less money = never happen. Who gives a fuck what it looks like as long as it brings the £££ in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Was even worse with that two group phases system. What a joke that was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
summerof69 Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Was even worse with that two group phases system. What a joke that was. Yep, we might have got a lot further in the competition if it wasn't that system being in the same group as your selves inter and the previous years finalists gave us slim hope of ever getting through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 you're right, but i enjoyed watching games those days a lot more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Did you guys get to see the interview with Wenger after the game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 SSN saying Clatternberg made another game winning mistake last night. Haven't seen it yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Like 90% of foreign players he grabbed the ball once fouled, ref blew whistle, player stood up and took free kick, Auxerre(?) scored. Nothing really imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Just a quick free-kick in an all right position, nothing in it. If it was much further forward i could understand Ajax being annoyed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 So just typical SSN bullshit to fill airtime? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 So just typical SSN bullshit to fill airtime? They mentioned it 4 times in about 50 minutes before i went to work this morning, must be really struggling as its the only news other than Sehwag's batting and the yellow tickers Heskey injury Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 If SSN was broadcast 2 hours a day, it would struggle to have enough to talk about TBH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 If SSN was broadcast 2 hours a day, it would struggle to have enough to talk about TBH. Not usually too bad when i watch 7-8am with 10 mins of goals & 10 mins of paper review shoehorned in between their main advertising features Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Wayne Bridge playing in the holding-role for City tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Wayne Bridge playing in the holding-role for City tonight. Oh dear, that could be fun. How come they've bought around 50 holding midfielders yet they still have to shoehorn Bridge into that position Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Crazy, Chelsea took a year to get in their stride as genuine title contenders. This is what, Man City's third year of spunking money? And I still can't see them truly pushing for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Crazy, Chelsea took a year to get in their stride as genuine title contenders. This is what, Man City's third year of spunking money? And I still can't see them truly pushing for it. Chelsea were already a pretty good team, though. It would be similar to if a billionaire came in to buy Tottenham. They need a lot of investment, obviously, but the roots of success are already there. Man City were nothing. They've had to essentially buy a completely different squad and completely new identity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 SSN have it as Zabaleta in midfield with Bridge & Richards full-backs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted November 4, 2010 Share Posted November 4, 2010 Anyone bothering with the Man City game? I can't see past a 1-0 City win. It's 2-2 already... isn't it? :-[ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts