Jump to content

The other games today - 2010/11


clintdempsey

Recommended Posts

Rangers would rather avoid defeat to the big bad English than take a risk and perhaps qualify. Pricks.

 

Jesus Christ. Didn't think you would peddle that rubbish.

 

9 men behind the ball with 80 minutes on the clock.

 

I think most teams do that against Manchester United. You're suggesting three were in attack with that as well.

 

Rangers know they are the weaker side ffs, they just need to nick a goal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rangers would rather avoid defeat to the big bad English than take a risk and perhaps qualify. Pricks.

 

Jesus Christ. Didn't think you would peddle that rubbish.

 

9 men behind the ball with 80 minutes on the clock.

 

I think most teams do that against Manchester United. You're suggesting three were in attack with that as well.

 

Rangers know they are the weaker side ffs, they just need to nick a goal.

 

Definitely 11-9 = 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rangers would rather avoid defeat to the big bad English than take a risk and perhaps qualify. Pricks.

 

Jesus Christ. Didn't think you would peddle that rubbish.

 

9 men behind the ball with 80 minutes on the clock.

 

I think most teams do that against Manchester United. You're suggesting three were in attack with that as well.

 

Rangers know they are the weaker side ffs, they just need to nick a goal.

 

Definitely 11-9 = 3

 

Read 8 for some reason. Point still stands, just a different number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rangers would rather avoid defeat to the big bad English than take a risk and perhaps qualify. Pricks.

 

Jesus Christ. Didn't think you would peddle that rubbish.

 

9 men behind the ball with 80 minutes on the clock.

 

I think most teams do that against Manchester United. You're suggesting three were in attack with that as well.

 

Rangers know they are the weaker side ffs, they just need to nick a goal.

 

Not when a draw amounts to nothing and win could amount to qualification they don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ronaldo is right. Sitting with the entire team behind the ball when you've got nothing to lose and it all to gain is ridiculous.

 

If I was a Rangers fan right now I'd be pissed off tbh. Atleast with 20 minutes to go they should have gone for it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ronaldo is right. Sitting with the entire team behind the ball when you've got nothing to lose and it all to gain is ridiculous.

 

 

 

Rangers are capable of nicking goals. If they bombed forward they would get raped. So no, no it is not ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ronaldo is right. Sitting with the entire team behind the ball when you've got nothing to lose and it all to gain is ridiculous.

 

 

 

Rangers are capable of nicking goals. If they bombed forward they would get raped. So no, no it is not ridiculous.

 

They barely got a sniff of nicking a goal.

 

They should have atleast gone for it with 20 minutes left, they might have got 'raped' 0-1. Oh wait, that happened anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ronaldo is right. Sitting with the entire team behind the ball when you've got nothing to lose and it all to gain is ridiculous.

 

 

 

Rangers are capable of nicking goals. If they bombed forward they would get raped. So no, no it is not ridiculous.

 

They barely got a sniff of nicking a goal.

 

They should have atleast gone for it with 20 minutes left, they might have got 'raped' 0-1. Oh wait, that happened anyway.

 

Kenny Miller had more than a sniff of goal. Should have scored imo. If he did then you would be saying the complete opposite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's this Rangers can nick a goal? When? How many do they actually score in Europe? Maybe they should expand a bit and try to play, never know what could happen. God knows 4-5-1 hasn't got them very far in Europe in all these years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's this Rangers can nick a goal? When? How many do they actually score in Europe? Maybe they should expand a bit and try to play, never know what could happen. God knows 4-5-1 hasn't got them very far in Europe in all these years.

 

Incase you didn't notice they aren't a good team. Their best attacker is Kenny Miller.

 

Final of the Uefa cup is shite anyway, don't know why they bother.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's this Rangers can nick a goal? When? How many do they actually score in Europe? Maybe they should expand a bit and try to play, never know what could happen. God knows 4-5-1 hasn't got them very far in Europe in all these years.

 

Their record in Europe is pittiful whether they go for it or not, tbh.

 

Atleast they won't be stinking up the competition anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...