Ryan_Taylor Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 "Only one place to start, Liverpool v Everton.." f*** off BBC you utter c***s. Shock. Murray is an epic wanker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 resuce adrian chiles from his itv exile! (haven't seen what hes said yet but i assume its idiotic) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 They probably started at Liverpool vs. Everton because it, er, had the most goals? Actually quite surprised they didnt begin with Spurs 0-0 Man Utd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 They probably started at Liverpool vs. Everton because it, er, had the most goals? Go on then, why is this game on before the Brum derby? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 They probably started at Liverpool vs. Everton because it, er, had the most goals? Actually quite surprised they didnt begin with Spurs 0-0 Man Utd. i am too, most unlike them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 They probably started at Liverpool vs. Everton because it, er, had the most goals? Actually quite surprised they didnt begin with Spurs 0-0 Man Utd. the night we spanked West Ham 5 nowt they started with the already televised 0-0 between Arsenal and Man City. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 They probably started at Liverpool vs. Everton because it, er, had the most goals? Go on then, why is this game on before the Brum derby? I assume you mean Brazil 1970 vs. UNITED? Well it's Spurs and UNITED, silly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Sunderland fans, heroes the lot of them, HEROES! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Er, what does the 'nature of this game' or 'the teams involved' have to do with any decision Pearce you wanker? Advocating different rules for the big teams, nice one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Sunderland fans, heroes the lot of them, HEROES! We could learn a lot from them wankers you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 They probably started at Liverpool vs. Everton because it, er, had the most goals? Actually quite surprised they didnt begin with Spurs 0-0 Man Utd. the night we spanked West Ham 5 nowt they started with the already televised 0-0 between Arsenal and Man City. Because they cater to the notion that people are more interested in the so-called bigger and better clubs. I can't see it changing anytime soon, the ordering of MOTD highlights is usually subject to much debate and backhanded humour but for the foreseeable future, if Man Utd/Chelsea/Arsenal have played, then regardless of the result, 9 times out of 10, they'll be shown before the likes of Newcastle and Everton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Er, what does the 'nature of this game' or 'the teams involved' have to do with any decision Pearce you wanker? Nice one. Agree, massively. Shocking comment, but in line with Pearce's growing sense of self-importance. You're a football commentator man, say what you see. This is not Robot Wars. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Er, what does the 'nature of this game' or 'the teams involved' have to do with any decision Pearce you wanker? Advocating different rules for the big teams, nice one. [move]SPLENDID![/move] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 They probably started at Liverpool vs. Everton because it, er, had the most goals? Actually quite surprised they didnt begin with Spurs 0-0 Man Utd. the night we spanked West Ham 5 nowt they started with the already televised 0-0 between Arsenal and Man City. Because they cater to the notion that people are more interested in the so-called bigger and better clubs. I can't see it changing anytime soon, the ordering of MOTD highlights is usually subject to much debate and backhanded humour but for the foreseeable future, if Man Utd/Chelsea/Arsenal have played, then regardless of the result, 9 times out of 10, they'll be shown before the likes of Newcastle and Everton. Plus Everton - Liverpool was a relegation rivals clash Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Plus Everton - Liverpool was a relegation clash It was high on ENERGY and COMMITMENT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Er, what does the 'nature of this game' or 'the teams involved' have to do with any decision Pearce you wanker? Nice one. Agree, massively. Shocking comment, but in line with Pearce's growing sense of self-importance. You're a football commentator man, say what you see. This is not Robot Wars. But oh, how I wish it was. Sir Killalot tapping in from 6 yards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 'Surely a game of this importance shouldn't be settled by a sending off for a foul like that.' Fucking disgraceful stuff this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Don't condone reactions like that regardless of the decision. Embarassing from Rafael. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 'Surely a game of this importance shouldn't be settled by a sending off for a foul like that.' Fucking disgraceful stuff this. He's just used the phrase again, Dave. "The young Mexican will have to learn that you can't do that in games of this importance". Dunno what his fucking game is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 God Jonathan Pearce is so painful to listen too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 'Surely a game of this importance shouldn't be settled by a sending off for a foul like that.' Fucking disgraceful stuff this. oh so if its just us plebs playing red card away but football royalty like manchester untied and tottenham hotspur then keep them in the pocket according to the bbc. this is whats wrong with football Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Er, what does the 'nature of this game' or 'the teams involved' have to do with any decision Pearce you wanker? Nice one. Agree, massively. Shocking comment, but in line with Pearce's growing sense of self-importance. You're a football commentator man, say what you see. This is not Robot Wars. But oh, how I wish it was. Sir Killalot tapping in from 6 yards. The ball would have to be replaced every couple of minutes, Hypnodisc has the touch of a shredder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 'Surely a game of this importance shouldn't be settled by a sending off for a foul like that.' Fucking disgraceful stuff this. Christ, that's bad. Fwiw, since when was it a hugely important game? My perception is, sure, it's a game between 2 good teams, with the visitors probably the champions-elect but I didn't see any massive significance to any result from it today. Was everyone hoping for a Spurs win so they could be catapulted into the title race that they're not in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Er, what does the 'nature of this game' or 'the teams involved' have to do with any decision Pearce you wanker? Nice one. Agree, massively. Shocking comment, but in line with Pearce's growing sense of self-importance. You're a football commentator man, say what you see. This is not Robot Wars. But oh, how I wish it was. Sir Killalot tapping in from 6 yards. He is on one of the Nick Hancock or Danny Baker vids from yesterday doing some proper yelling commentary for a Birmingham game, he's gone proper full circle like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 'Surely a game of this importance shouldn't be settled by a sending off for a foul like that.' Fucking disgraceful stuff this. He's just used the phrase again, Dave. "The young Mexican will have to learn that you can't do that in games of this importance". Dunno what his fucking game is. Like it'd be perfectly fine in a match between Wolves and Wigan where nobody cares. It's alright then. The rules should only apply when the smaller teams are playing. What a fucking cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts