Hanshithispantz Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 I think he genuinely thought that he'd sussed the system or something Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 No real surprise; he was the prime candidate to leave in order to raise cash this summer. Williamson's start to life in the Premier League will have only reinforced this. Only problem is we'll get nowhere near his worth this way. Opened page one. Dat post. 20:20 hindsight and all that like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 That was when we transfer listed him, don't see owt obviously wrong there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 At the point when he'd been transfer listed, Williamson looked really quite capable at this level. He played well once we'd just come up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 At the point when he'd been transfer listed, Williamson looked really quite capable at this level. He played well once we'd just come up. Absolutely, the Colo-Williamson was our best partnership by quite a distance in the 2010/11 season. Williamson's weaknesses have been completely exposed now mind which is a shame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted April 5, 2013 Share Posted April 5, 2013 That was when we transfer listed him, don't see owt obviously wrong there. Just what we know now about Williamson. And how bad that sale would have been Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 At the point when he'd been transfer listed, Williamson looked really quite capable at this level. He played well once we'd just come up. Absolutely, the Colo-Williamson was our best partnership by quite a distance in the 2010/11 season. Williamson's weaknesses have been completely exposed now mind which is a shame. nope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 It was our best bet, like. They usually looked solid-ish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Yup, there was the time when most of us prefer the 'Willicini' partnership. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Yup, there was the time when most of us prefer the 'Willicini' partnership. aye, started around the time he was out for ages after having his jaw broke and many making a choice between first team goal scoring centre forward or currently out injured centre half. he got a lot worse during his time out in the way our players usually get a lot better when out injured. the defence of andy carroll being our very own small scale di canio moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Yup, there was the time when most of us prefer the 'Willicini' partnership. aye, started around the time he was out for ages after having his jaw broke and many making a choice between first team goal scoring centre forward or currently out injured centre half. he got a lot worse during his time out in the way our players usually get a lot better when out injured. the defence of andy carroll being our very own small scale di canio moment. Not really. Williamson was pretty assured during that spell and showed more composure than Saylor did pre-Pardew. Of course Saylor improved a lot after Pardew came in but that shouldn't take away from the decent albeit short-lived partnership of Colo and Williamson. Iirc it was before the Saylor-Carroll fight too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Yup, there was the time when most of us prefer the 'Willicini' partnership. aye, started around the time he was out for ages after having his jaw broke and many making a choice between first team goal scoring centre forward or currently out injured centre half. he got a lot worse during his time out in the way our players usually get a lot better when out injured. the defence of andy carroll being our very own small scale di canio moment. Not really. Williamson was pretty assured during that spell and showed more composure than Saylor did pre-Pardew. Of course Saylor improved a lot after Pardew came in but that shouldn't take away from the decent albeit short-lived partnership of Colo and Williamson. first part of the championship season taylor was our best centre half, till colo got up to speed. then when he came back from injury he was very good and better than williamson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Absolutely, the Colo-Williamson was our best partnership by quite a distance in the 2010/11 season. Williamson's weaknesses have been completely exposed now mind which is a shame. nope. first part of the championship season taylor was our best centre half, till colo got up to speed. then when he came back from injury he was very good and better than williamson. You do realise we are talking about our first season back into the premier league don't you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted April 6, 2013 Share Posted April 6, 2013 Absolutely, the Colo-Williamson was our best partnership by quite a distance in the 2010/11 season. Williamson's weaknesses have been completely exposed now mind which is a shame. nope. first part of the championship season taylor was our best centre half, till colo got up to speed. then when he came back from injury he was very good and better than williamson. You do realise we are talking about our first season back into the premier league don't you? yes, thats the bit about when he came back, covering the time before pardew came. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Did it again the silly fuck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Is that move actually legal? Great improvisation, either way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Is that move actually legal? Great improvisation, either way. Don't see why not? Unsporting behaviour, perhaps? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Nah I dunno - I can just remember some mutterings about whether it was allowed or not, last time he did it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 IIRC, it's an illegal move but most refs don't know that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Novocastrian Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Is that move actually legal? Great improvisation, either way. He must practice that in training because it looked a lot more difficult than the last one. Maybe we should get all of the defence practicing it, in years to come it will be a common defensive skill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Coming to think about it, I don't think you're allowed to score like that. Probably should've been an indirect free-kick to Fulham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 IIRC, it's an illegal move but most refs don't know that. I'd call it more liberal interpretation of the rules Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Has he trademarked that move yet? Needs his own bloody video game character with signature moves. - Taunt Keep - Headed lateral Ground Pass - Heart Attack dive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Begbie Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Backpass rule: Trickery If the referee believes a defender is trying to circumvent the backpass law using trickery, he can penalize the player for unsporting behavior. For example, if a defender deliberately flicks the ball up into the air and then heads it back to the goalkeeper, the referee will award an indirect free kick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Backpass rule: Trickery If the referee believes a defender is trying to circumvent the backpass law using trickery, he can penalize the player for unsporting behavior. For example, if a defender deliberately flicks the ball up into the air and then heads it back to the goalkeeper, the referee will award an indirect free kick. Yep playing with fire, as soon as a ref knows the rules he's doomed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now