BONTEMPI Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 It was not a bet, it is was a gentleman's agreement. http://static.onemansblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/The-English-Gentleman-by-Monocle.jpeg Hmmmmmmmmmmm Gentlemahns agreement tu sey!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinotheprehistoricgeordie Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 It was not a bet, it is was a gentleman's agreement. http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/7059/finaldy.png Uploaded with ImageShack.us Huzzzah! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 It's funny as hell, but it takes the piss tbh. If it's an actual permanent ban then it's fucking stupid. In my mind it's just been an amusing distraction, and he's a nice kid - don't get me wrong, if it was Stifler or Stu or someone then I'd be all self righteous about a bet being a bet, and would delight in them fucking off. Especially king dickhead Stu, that would be ace. But yeah, Messi's areet - don't ban him permanently or owt, or I'll feel guilty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matta Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 Too far, imo. Messi is good people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 How long is the ban for? How long is a permanent piece of string? :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 Is the twat going to be released when Sewpa Kev scores again or something? Not that I give a shit like, he should be castrated for this fatal error imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 It's funny as hell, but it takes the piss tbh. If it's an actual permanent ban then it's fucking stupid. In my mind it's just been an amusing distraction, and he's a nice kid - don't get me wrong, if it was Stifler or Stu or someone then I'd be all self righteous about a bet being a bet, and would delight in them fucking off. Especially king dickhead Stu, that would be ace. But yeah, Messi's areet - don't ban him permanently or owt, or I'll feel guilty. RTG-tastic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 Is the t*** going to be released when Sewpa Kev scores again or something? Not that I give a s*** like, he should be castrated for this fatal error imo. The ban shouldn't be lifted when Nolan scores again like. That's him being rewarded for Nolan doing good. He doubted Nolan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 I'm pissing myself. Cup some!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 And I thought I'd seen it all on the internet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. You'd think he'd been arrested and thrown in jail for failing to drink his own piss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. You'd think he'd been arrested and thrown in jail for failing to drink his own piss. No, I just don't see where he ever agreed to being banned if he didn't do it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. You'd think he'd been arrested and thrown in jail for failing to drink his own piss. No, I just don't see where he ever agreed to being banned if he didn't do it? It's a joke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. You'd think he'd been arrested and thrown in jail for failing to drink his own piss. No, I just don't see where he ever agreed to being banned if he didn't do it? People need to learn that for every action you take in life there are repercussions or consequences. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 Stifler, what is it with you and Neesy for sticking up for the voiceless? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. You'd think he'd been arrested and thrown in jail for failing to drink his own piss. No, I just don't see where he ever agreed to being banned if he didn't do it? :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. You'd think he'd been arrested and thrown in jail for failing to drink his own piss. No, I just don't see where he ever agreed to being banned if he didn't do it? Lighten up man. He requires some serious ripping for making a statement like that and the conditions coming true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 one thing i reckon makes this harsh - there was no 'other side' to the bet was there? there was nothing for IP to lose in the whole deal so people say he should 'stick to his side of the bet' but there was only one side right? was hardly a bet in that case being boring aside it's still canny funny That just makes his bet more stupid and meaningful when he made it. Shows how (wrongly) confident he was. If anything there should be additional punishments if Nolan scores again. Did he actually say he would give up his membership if Nolan scored 8 goals and he didn't drink his own piss? How about we ban all the people who said they would eat their hat if we won and we did?, I don't remember any evidence of hat eating being shown on here. I'm not saying that, I'm disputing that it's harsh because it was a one way bet. He created the conditions. Not really, all he said was he would drink his own piss, I don't seem to remember him saying he could be punished if he didn't, though if someone wishes to prove me wrong then fair play to the mods for taking his word. You'd think he'd been arrested and thrown in jail for failing to drink his own piss. No, I just don't see where he ever agreed to being banned if he didn't do it? Why don't you drink his piss, then?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 I for one would be happy for the ban to be lifted if Stifler drinks Messi's piss. We'd need to set up some sort of piss exchange though, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted December 18, 2010 Share Posted December 18, 2010 It#s only piss man, not gonna kill him, just get hammered and do it messi. You'll be alright. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now