Thespence Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Bringing Pancrate back. Ready & waiting http://www.football.fr/football/images/photosjoueurs/pancrate-fabrice-1448.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 really don't get good vibes about this guy. i wonder who #9 on the list is.... FMP Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 How reliable is the site claiming the deal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Bringing Pancrate back. or just using this link to push Larsson into a decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shaun Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Over 26. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 I'm going to give my standard "safe" answer to all transfer stories to this. If he signs, he's not good enough. If he's good, he won't sign. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 I'm glad taxfree isn't the manager. We'd never buy anyone ever I would go for El-Arabi/Gameiro, Hammill, M'Bengue - in january. I'd also signed up Carroll and Enrique for life. We'd go to CL tbh with me in charge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 About £3.3m - don't know much about the guy, but if others reckon he's decent then bring him on the European scouting network have come up trumps so far. Already made Ashley 15m+ from tiotes inflated price. Whilst this isn't a similar case due to zianis age the fact that wolfsburg paid 10 m for him will make Ashley feel he has a bargain Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 A bit of random DWS (Dennis Wise scouting) suggests he's a skillful player with a decent turn of pace. Looks like the type of player that would excite and frustrate in equal measures. That'll do me Btw I think once he gets a run of games I think we will find HBA is a bit like that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Blokes 28 aye? He's in his fucking prime man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Blokes 28 aye? He's in his f***ing prime man. Turning 29 this year and spending most of the time on the bench. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 I'm going to give my standard "safe" answer to all transfer stories to this. If he signs, he's not good enough. If he's good, he won't sign. A variation on Groucho Marx syndrome. (He refused to join any club that would have him as a member) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shaun Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. 15k a week is bullshit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. since he won't be signing he fits in quite well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Quoting a "club source" from the NotW. That's me sold. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. Where is that quote from? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Beat me to it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shaun Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. 15k a week is bullshit that was in the championship. i just pasted it all for max effect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. Actually the idea was that substantial fees will only be paid on these kinds of players in the long run. £3 million is not a large fee. Honestly, use your common sense. Don't be so mechanical and rigid in your thinking. If the opportunity is there to add an experienced player who is decent for a small fee and reasonable wages, obviously you still take the deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shaun Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. Actually the idea was that substantial fees will only be paid on these kinds of players in the long run. £3 million is not a large fee. Honestly, use your common sense. Don't be so mechanical and rigid in your thinking. If the opportunity is there to add an experienced player who is decent for a small fee and reasonable wages, obviously you still take the deal. £3m is a huge fee for someone who has no resale value, no prem experience, most likely doesn't speak english, will ask for high wages, sour history with one of our star players. the list goes on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 "Ashley will only allow players to be bought if they are under 26 years of age, have some resale value and accept a wage limit of £15K a week, which is around £750K/year." tell me where he fits into that policy, please. Actually the idea was that substantial fees will only be paid on these kinds of players in the long run. £3 million is not a large fee. Honestly, use your common sense. Don't be so mechanical and rigid in your thinking. If the opportunity is there to add an experienced player who is decent for a small fee and reasonable wages, obviously you still take the deal. £3m is a huge fee for someone who has no resale value, no prem experience, most likely doesn't speak english, will ask for high wages, sour history with one of our star players. the list goes on. Absolute rubbish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Because the last time we signed a non-English-speaking foreign midfielder with no Premiership experience who had been on the fringes of his team in a second-tier European League he turned out to be horrible! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Instead of wasting our time/money on players like Ziani and Larsson, we should go for a striker with pace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 I think we might still end up with Larsson. If no one else goes in with a better he will probably climb down and come here. This one just doesn't seem convincing. Ziani looks a quick and skilful player but then Routledge is that. I'd like to have seen some footage of him actually making or taking goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now