Nobody Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I was shocked when Mariner blew for a free kick. It's a perfectly timed challenge, never in a million years is that a red card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveR Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 No need to add any text as theres a Tiote thread already on the go. Just a vote will suffice unless you must ... hahaha 11 pages.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I don't believe it was a red car offence but I also don't believe the FA will overturn it because they are a bunch of dicks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I just don't think Tiote would have made the tackle had he thought he'd not get there long before ball and player so not sure what was dangerous about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Probably end up getting an extra ban if we appeal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 The FA will not rescind the red card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I do hope the one who was punched after the game was the one who rolled around pretending to be hurt after tripping over Tiote after he had won the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Probably end up getting an extra ban if we appeal. I very much doubt it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Nah only gets extended if there was no grounds of an appeal doesn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Nah only gets extended if there was no grounds of an appeal doesn't it? thought it was if we're judged to have 'wasted their time' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 It's hardly wasting their time though when then there's a good argument he won the ball fair and square and didn't hurt the opponent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Andre Marriner should be kept well away from professional football and go back to a level he can control. Totally conned yesterday by the Stevenage player and the reaction of a rabid crowd, he is just unfit for this level of the game. Tiote's red must be rescinded if there is any justice in the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SuperShola! Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 FA Stick with Red card. Blame Blatter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest michaelfoster Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Soon as he jumped in he lost control of the tackle, regardless if he got the ball it was a dangerous tackle, no way this will be recinded Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 The way he hooks the ball back shows he had only the ball on his mind. The way he threw himself in is the sticking point. If he goes in a fraction too late, he goes through the players standing foot. It's a good challenge but it was reckless. I don't think it was a red, a yellow and a strong talking to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 The way he hooks the ball back shows he had only the ball on his mind. The way he threw himself in is the sticking point. If he goes in a fraction too late, he goes through the players standing foot. It's a good challenge but it was reckless. I don't think it was a red, a yellow and a strong talking to. But that's a red in the eyes of the 'Laws of the Game'. It's not the outcome, it's the action itself, which was a lunge and if he'd got it even a fraction wrong (yes I know he didn't), he could have snapped the player in two. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 The way he hooks the ball back shows he had only the ball on his mind. The way he threw himself in is the sticking point. If he goes in a fraction too late, he goes through the players standing foot. It's a good challenge but it was reckless. I don't think it was a red, a yellow and a strong talking to. But that's a red in the eyes of the 'Laws of the Game'. It's not the outcome, it's the action itself, which was a lunge and if he'd got it even a fraction wrong (yes I know he didn't), he could have snapped the player in two. It's not the outcome, but then you go onto say he could have snapped the player in two. So it is, really, the possible outcome that the ref judges the challenge on. The outcome was both players got up, let's not wrap the players in cotton wool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Just to clarify a point.... The steps to disciplining players go along a sliding scale. *A careless tackle is one that's merely worthy of a free kick, and perhaps a word. *A reckless tackle would be worthy of a yellow card. *A tackle which uses excessive force and/or endangers the safety of an opponent is worthy of a red card. The difficult bit is what you deem to be endangering the safety of an opponent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Enter, Steven Gerrard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Now that was reckless with excessive force. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 no chance now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Stevie g's was worse, and the commentators reckon it was a harsh red. I'm changing my mind on the tiote challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Gerrard won the ball Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Gerrard won the ball Hahahaha That was 10 times worse than tiotes. Gerrard jumped at the player two feet studs up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Rafael's a red? Surely should be according to the "laws of the game" Anyone? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now