Guest palnese Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Oh fuck off. It was a great tackle. End of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Oh f*** off. It was a great tackle. End of. I know a referee, assistant and FA appeal panel who would disagree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Oh f*** off. It was a great tackle. End of. I know a FA appeal panel who would disagree Has the appeal already been heard and thrown out? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Yawn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Won the ball and their player acted like a proper fanny. So much for no play acting in the lower leagues cause they're all nails init. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Won the ball and their player acted like a proper fanny. So much for no play acting in the lower leagues cause they're all nails init. They play acted all evening and the ref bought just about every single effort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Oh f*** off. It was a great tackle. End of. I know a referee, assistant and FA appeal panel who would disagree You do have a point. I used to adore the so-called hard men, when a good tackle was almost as good as a goal. Those days are gone, and I fucking hate it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Aye. Can't believe the greatest player in the world performed the greatest challenge of all time and got sent off. The ref should have awarded us a goal for it, it was that good. Sweet baby Moses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Aye. Can't believe the greatest player in the world performed the greatest challenge of all time and got sent off. The ref should have awarded us a goal for it, it was that good. Sweet baby Moses. I'm not the one painting the challenge out like it was the greatest thing ever seen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Oh f*** off. It was a great tackle. End of. I know a referee, assistant and FA appeal panel who would disagree It should have been seen as a great tackle though. I still fail to see how they other player actually got injured. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Aye. Can't believe the greatest player in the world performed the greatest challenge of all time and got sent off. The ref should have awarded us a goal for it, it was that good. Sweet baby Moses. I'm not the one painting the challenge out like it was the greatest thing ever seen. It was a fantastic tackle, end of. How that can be argued against is beyond me. You're now going to say the referee disagreed, as will a panel of cunts, yada yada yada Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Aye. Can't believe the greatest player in the world performed the greatest challenge of all time and got sent off. The ref should have awarded us a goal for it, it was that good. Sweet baby Moses. I'm not the one painting the challenge out like it was the greatest thing ever seen. It was a fantastic tackle, end of. How that can be argued against is beyond me. You're now going to say the referee disagreed, as will a panel of c***s, yada yada yada Again, like I've said about a thousand times since it happened, nobody is disputing that he won the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 How long do appeals generally take before they reach a conclusion? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 How long do appeals generally take before they reach a conclusion? Like half a day, if that I think? It's usually "Blah blah blah's appeal will be heard today" in the morning and you've got the decision by that afternoon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Think this debate has ran its course Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 15 pages? You guys are really hardcore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 To hopefully conclude my input I can see both sides of the argument: FOR He took the ball He attacked the ball not the man He got to the ball first He didnt go over the top of the player AGAINST The speed he was travelling He lunged in the air He touched the player with the trail leg Good discussions all round with 2 sides equally passionate about their views, whilst all hoping for the same result, the card being recinded I hope this time tomorrow night we are debating who he is going to 'Tiote' in the derby Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 To hopefully conclude my input I can see both sides of the argument: FOR He took the ball He attacked the ball not the man He got to the ball first He didnt go over the top of the player AGAINST The speed he was travelling He lunged in the air He touched the player with the trail leg Good discussions all round with 2 sides equally passionate about their views, whilst all hoping for the same result, the card being recinded I hope this time tomorrow night we are debating who he is going to 'Tiote' in the derby :thup: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Well summed up sicko Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Oh f*** off. It was a great tackle. End of. I know a referee, assistant and FA appeal panel who would disagree because they're bloody idiots like you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 To hopefully conclude my input I can see both sides of the argument: FOR He took the ball He attacked the ball not the man He got to the ball first He didnt go over the top of the player AGAINST The speed he was travelling He lunged in the air He touched the player with the trail leg Good discussions all round with 2 sides equally passionate about their views, whilst all hoping for the same result, the card being recinded I hope this time tomorrow night we are debating who he is going to 'Tiote' in the derby :thup: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Oh f*** off. It was a great tackle. End of. I know a referee, assistant and FA appeal panel who would disagree because they're bloody idiots like you. Aye, whatever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OoOGazOoO Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 There isn't a chance it will get overturned. Both feet off the floor, which basically means it was a sending off, Tiote's ban will stand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 saw it for the first time today. It was a good tackle, but easily deemed reckless. No chance it'll be overturned. Could get away with it in Sunday league/school football (I've gotten away with something similar before) but not in the professional game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 When you slow it down and analyse it, there's not a thing wrong with it. He's in control, he wins the ball and doesn't lead with the studs. Unfortunately I've no faith in the FA to realise this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now