sander68 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 TalkSport has two exactly the same articles on their website, but with different titles. http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/transfer-rumours/1024/51/newcastle-set-talks-lyon-over-defender http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/transfer-rumours/1025/15/newcastle-set-crunch-talks-over-lyon-defender Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam1 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 "Crunch" talks God I hate nonsensical football journalism phrases. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBG Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 French reports now saying he's due in for a medical on Monday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 French reports now saying he's due in for a medical on Monday. Link? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 So goes in with my ealier post. Passes the medical, we sign him. Fails like he did at AC Milan, we sign Pieters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBG Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 @FrenchFtWeekly FFW Foot01 are reporting that Aly Cissokho will be in Newcastle on Monday for a medical. Both teams still haven't agreed on a price yet #NUFC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Still haven't agreed a fee yet. What a suprise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiesned Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 @FrenchFtWeekly FFW Foot01 are reporting that Aly Cissokho will be in Newcastle on Monday for a medical. Both teams still haven't agreed on a price yet #NUFC So if he passes medical we can say we didn't agree fee but if he fails medical it'll be a shame for the lad as the two clubs had just agreed a fee. [/cynical] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Foot01 is quoting the English press, (I'm guessing that TalkSport article?) which in turn is quoting the French press. It's like that Blur song... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_F Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 So goes in with my ealier post. Passes the medical, we sign him. Fails like he did at AC Milan, we sign Pieters. Aye I bet Pieters will go along with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 @FrenchFtWeekly FFW Foot01 are reporting that Aly Cissokho will be in Newcastle on Monday for a medical. Both teams still haven't agreed on a price yet #NUFC So personal demands agreed. Now pay up you tight c***s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Actually I'm certain they're quoting Talk Sport. The Foot01 article http://www.foot01.com/foot-europeen/cissokho-attendu-lundi-a-newcastle,76287 "According to the English press....talks ongoing over how the fee is paid". Which is what the Talk Sport article says, and they're saying "According to reports in France".... which I'm guessing came from France Football quoted here... http://www.olympique-et-lyonnais.com/mercato/mercato-cissokho-fixe-lundi,23079.html Which just says that Lyon are holding talks with the player himself about his future on Monday, no particular mention of Newcastle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Would players go for a medical if no fee is agreed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 That's Talkshite who have said that though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest axel Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 What the fuck, are we really getting this guy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Probably not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Hold on, this guy and Roux, we might be getting the two players we needed after all. I guess it's too much to ask for a replacement for Barton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Hold on, this guy and Roux, we might be getting the two players we needed after all. I guess it's too much to ask for a replacement for Barton. It's more important that we sign Roux and Cissokho..Besides, I think Jonas could be great as a RM.. And with Mav on the left, we would have a more balanced midfield than earlier: speed and movement on the flanks, and muscle and passing abilities in the center.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Would players go for a medical if no fee is agreed? Doesn't make sense to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Hold on, this guy and Roux, we might be getting the two players we needed after all. I guess it's too much to ask for a replacement for Barton. We need a Carroll replacement more than we need Roux tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 A good Barton replacement would have been keeping Barton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Would players go for a medical if no fee is agreed? It can happen, similar to the Barton deal in that if the deal was to happen it would not be held up by a medical If he is having a medical then at least we know they are happy to sell him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Hold on, this guy and Roux, we might be getting the two players we needed after all. I guess it's too much to ask for a replacement for Barton. We need a Carroll replacement more than we need Roux tbh. Roux in, Løven and Ranger out. Another striker in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Hold on, this guy and Roux, we might be getting the two players we needed after all. I guess it's too much to ask for a replacement for Barton. We need a Carroll replacement more than we need Roux tbh. Roux in, Løven and Ranger out. Another striker in. I see two big holes in this argument... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Hold on, this guy and Roux, we might be getting the two players we needed after all. I guess it's too much to ask for a replacement for Barton. We need a Carroll replacement more than we need Roux tbh. Roux in, Løven and Ranger out. Another striker in. I see two big holes in this argument... Was more me writing up my wishes, rather than an argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now